Professional Wrestling May Have the Most Absurd Take on the U.S.-Russia Relationship

WWE’s Monday Night RAW has turned U.S.-Russia relations into a bizarre plot point.

Lana and Rusev of the WWE.
National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
July 29, 2014, 8:04 a.m.

This year has brought a wealth of ana­lys­is from odd corners on Vladi­mir Putin and Rus­sia’s place in the world. Putin is “one of the great liv­ing world lead­ers,” Un­der Siege star Steven Seagal said this spring. “Putin is do­ing just about the same as Hitler,” Eng­land’s Prince Charles said in May.

But there may be no take more out­land­ish than what World Wrest­ling En­ter­tain­ment is provid­ing view­ers on Monday Night RAW

Putin has been a rhet­or­ic­al fix­ture in the WWE since May, when he made his photo de­but as the “idol” of the Rus­si­an duo Lana and Ru­sev. Lana, who is played by an Amer­ic­an, is the man­ager of Ru­sev, a hulk­ing wrest­ler billed as “a hero of the Rus­si­an Fed­er­a­tion” (played, of course, by a Bul­gari­an man). 

Last week on RAW, Lana seem­ingly made ref­er­ence to the down­ing of Malay­sia Air­lines Flight 17 (which WWE denies), call­ing out to the Amer­ic­an crowd, “You blame Rus­sia for cur­rent events?” adding that “you Amer­ic­ans should be scol­ded for your war­mon­ger­ing in Afgh­anistan and Ir­aq. You Amer­ic­ans should be in­sul­ted and afraid.”

On last night’s Monday Night RAW, the WWE’s not-so-cold war peaked with a dis­cus­sion of flags between the Rus­si­an con­tin­gent of Lana and Ru­sev and the Amer­ic­an wrest­ler Jack Swag­ger and his man­ager, Zeb Col­ter.{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5128) }}

“Your Amer­ic­an flag is a state­ment,” Lana began in something re­sem­bling a Rus­si­an ac­cent, over chants of “U-S-A” at the Hou­s­ton sta­di­um. The flag “used to be a su­prem­acy over all the na­tions. It used to fly over bat­tle­fields, on the masts of ships. It even landed on the sur­face of the moon it­self. And where is your so-called old glory now? It is a faded ban­ner for a ruined na­tion ruled by cow­ards that get fat off of your apathy.” 

She con­tin­ued with praise of “the fear­less lead­er Vladi­mir Putin” (whose face was promptly pro­jec­ted on screen and booed) and con­dem­na­tion of the “pup­pet Pres­id­ent Obama” who “wags his fin­ger like a school­teach­er.”

But maybe the best part of the back-and-forth came from Zeb Col­ter, who came back with a so­li­lo­quy on the mean­ing of the Amer­ic­an flag. The flag, he said,

rep­res­ents a fam­ily sit­ting around the table at Thanks­giv­ing with their broth­ers and sis­ters and aunts and uncles, giv­ing thanks that they sur­vived an­oth­er year. We the people. It rep­res­ents thou­sands of Amer­ic­ans stand­ing around a TV set watch­ing a foot­ball game. We the people. It rep­res­ents a fath­er and his son fish­ing, a moth­er and daugh­ter learn­ing to cook to­geth­er. It rep­res­ents pickup trucks, pretty girls, and beer.

It’s easy to laugh off this ex­change for be­ing what it is — a simply scrip­ted TV show, laced with sex­ism, aimed at ad­oles­cent boys and young men. But the thing is, WWE is in­cred­ibly pop­u­lar, across mul­tiple demo­graph­ics. Last week’s RAW had nearly 4.5 mil­lion view­ers. That’s for a three-hour show. Monday Night RAW cur­rently tops Niel­son’s Twit­ter TV rat­ings, a meas­ure of how much at­ten­tion any show gets on the so­cial-me­dia plat­form.

Us­ing Rus­sia and Putin as foils for the United States makes sense for the WWE. A CNN poll last week found that just 19 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans have a fa­vor­able view of Rus­sia. And for some view­ers, the fram­ing of Putin as manly lead­er versus Obama as in­ef­fect­ive nag is just val­id­a­tion. There still is a cult of per­son­al­ity sur­round­ing Putin in the U.S., where some on the Amer­ic­an Right have openly ad­mired the Rus­si­an pres­id­ent’s over-the-top macho-ness, es­pe­cially when com­pared to Obama.

“Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin has giv­en us good ma­ter­i­al to work with,” a WWE spokes­man told The Daily Beast in May. And as The Daily Beast notes, that ma­ter­i­al is pay­ing off not just in the U.S. but in Rus­sia, too. Two WWE shows ac­tu­ally air on Rus­si­an tele­vi­sion, where Putin’s ap­prov­al rat­ing is at 83 per­cent and Lana and Ru­sev aren’t the bad guys.

In Wash­ing­ton this year, the con­flict between the U.S. and Rus­sia, and what the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion should do about it, has been all en­com­passing. But for mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans, the U.S.-Rus­sia row is most vis­ible as a pivotal plot point on one of their fa­vor­ite TV shows.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×