Dating website OkCupid revealed Monday that it purposefully set up people with bad matches to test its own algorithm.
A similar experiment landed Facebook at the center of a major controversy recently. Sen. Mark Warner and a privacy group even asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether Facebook broke the law by manipulating the content in users’ news feeds to study how it affected their moods.
But OkCupid argues that neither site has anything to apologize for.
“Most ideas are bad. Even good ideas could be better. Experiments are how you sort all this out,” Christian Rudder, one of the site’s founders, wrote in a blog post.
He said anyone who uses the Internet is “the subject of hundreds of experiments at any given time, on every site.”
To test how reliable its own algorithm was, OkCupid told certain people they would be a good match for each other even when the algorithm actually indicated they would be a bad match.
People were more likely to message back and forth with bad matches if the site told them they would be good matches, OkCupid found.
But a sustained conversation was most likely if people were told they were a good match and actually were. Rudder said the experiment showed that OkCupid’s algorithm actually works.
The company also revealed less-controversial studies showing how important photos are on the site.
Justin Brookman, the director of consumer privacy for the Center for Democracy and Technology, applauded OkCupid for providing more transparency about how it experiments on users.
But he acknowledged that some people may feel misled because they trusted the site to provide accurate information.
“There are some real ethical questions,” Brookman said, arguing that websites and policymakers should think more about where to draw the line between useful internal testing and deceptive business practices.
What We're Following See More »
As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."
President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.
In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."
Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."
"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."