5 Women Who Shape Health Care Policy

Sylvia Mathews Burwell is guiding the Affordable Care Act into its second year while Karen Ignagni is the health insurance industry’s top representative in Washington.

Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards. 
©2012 Richard A. Bloom
National Journal Staff
See more stories about...
National Journal Staff
July 25, 2014, 1 a.m.

This year, Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Wo­men in Wash­ing­ton list fo­cuses on wo­men who ex­er­cise power­ful in­flu­ence in five policy areas: en­ergy, health care, tech­no­logy, de­fense, and edu­ca­tion.

Sylvia Math­ews Bur­well (Alex Wong/Getty Im­ages)Sylvia Math­ews Bur­well, Health and Hu­man Ser­vices Sec­ret­ary

Bur­well, pre­vi­ously dir­ect­or of the White House budget of­fice, re­cently took Kath­leen Se­beli­us’s place as head of HHS. She is pop­u­lar on Cap­it­ol Hill and has a repu­ta­tion as a skilled man­ager. She’ll need those skills as she guides the Af­ford­able Care Act in­to its second year while keep­ing the rest of the de­part­ment hum­ming. Bur­well has already taken steps to re­or­gan­ize HHS, adding new po­s­i­tions with dir­ect over­sight of the in­sur­ance ex­changes.

Mar­ilyn Taven­ner, Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices Ad­min­is­trat­or

With dir­ect re­spons­ib­il­ity for Medi­care, Medi­caid, and most of Obama­care, Taven­ner is on the hook for some of the most con­tro­ver­sial de­cisions in health care, from cuts in pro­viders’ Medi­care pay­ments to re­build­ing the ACA’s en­roll­ment sys­tem. Taven­ner, like Bur­well, came in­to the job with strong bi­par­tis­an sup­port and largely avoided any blame for Health­Care.gov’s rocky rol­lout. But CMS has come un­der fire from Re­pub­lic­ans over pro­posed cuts to Medi­care Ad­vant­age, and the agency is still sort­ing through a back­log of in­com­plete Medi­caid en­roll­ments.

Jeanne Lam­brew, Deputy As­sist­ant to the Pres­id­ent for Health Policy

Lam­brew, who has a back­ground in aca­demia, is Pres­id­ent Obama’s top health policy ad­viser and has provided a steady hand on the is­sue since the early days of the ad­min­is­tra­tion. She is deeply in­volved in the nitty-gritty of ACA im­ple­ment­a­tion and will have Obama’s ear in the next big front in the health care de­bate: cost con­trol.

Kar­en Ig­nagni, Pres­id­ent and CEO, Amer­ica’s Health In­sur­ance Plans

As the health in­sur­ance in­dustry’s top rep­res­ent­at­ive in Wash­ing­ton, Ig­nagni has had an in­tense half-dec­ade, hav­ing guided AHIP through the de­bate over the Af­ford­able Care Act. Dur­ing the botched de­but of Health­Care.gov, in­surers ended up do­ing most of the work the web­site was sup­posed to do, thus win­ning cred­ib­il­ity as the pro­tect­ors of Obama­care. Ig­nagni’s next chal­lenge: what’s shap­ing up to be an all-out war between her in­dustry and phar­ma­ceut­ic­al com­pan­ies over the high cost of pre­scrip­tion drugs.

Cecile Richards (Richard A. Bloom)Cecile Richards, Pres­id­ent, Planned Par­ent­hood

Richards is un­doubtedly one of the most power­ful wo­men in Demo­crat­ic polit­ics, and her status keeps grow­ing amid flare-ups ran­ging from Todd Akin to the Su­preme Court’s rul­ing lim­it­ing Obama­care’s con­tra­cep­tion man­date. She leads Planned Par­ent­hood’s day-to-day op­er­a­tions as well as its polit­ic­al arm, put­ting her squarely at the in­ter­sec­tion of health care policy and polit­ics.

Sylvia Mathews Burwell (Alex Wong/Getty Images)Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Health and Human Services Secretary

Bur­well, pre­vi­ously dir­ect­or of the White House budget of­fice, re­cently took Kath­leen Se­beli­us’s place as head of HHS. She is pop­u­lar on Cap­it­ol Hill and has a repu­ta­tion as a skilled man­ager. She’ll need those skills as she guides the Af­ford­able Care Act in­to its second year while keep­ing the rest of the de­part­ment hum­ming. Bur­well has already taken steps to re­or­gan­ize HHS, adding new po­s­i­tions with dir­ect over­sight of the in­sur­ance ex­changes.

Marilyn Tavenner, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator

With dir­ect re­spons­ib­il­ity for Medi­care, Medi­caid, and most of Obama­care, Taven­ner is on the hook for some of the most con­tro­ver­sial de­cisions in health care, from cuts in pro­viders’ Medi­care pay­ments to re­build­ing the ACA’s en­roll­ment sys­tem. Taven­ner, like Bur­well, came in­to the job with strong bi­par­tis­an sup­port and largely avoided any blame for Health­Care.gov’s rocky rol­lout. But CMS has come un­der fire from Re­pub­lic­ans over pro­posed cuts to Medi­care Ad­vant­age, and the agency is still sort­ing through a back­log of in­com­plete Medi­caid en­roll­ments.

Jeanne Lambrew, Deputy Assistant to the President for Health Policy

Lam­brew, who has a back­ground in aca­demia, is Pres­id­ent Obama’s top health policy ad­viser and has provided a steady hand on the is­sue since the early days of the ad­min­is­tra­tion. She is deeply in­volved in the nitty-gritty of ACA im­ple­ment­a­tion and will have Obama’s ear in the next big front in the health care de­bate: cost con­trol.

Karen Ignagni, President and CEO, America's Health Insurance Plans

As the health in­sur­ance in­dustry’s top rep­res­ent­at­ive in Wash­ing­ton, Ig­nagni has had an in­tense half-dec­ade, hav­ing guided AHIP through the de­bate over the Af­ford­able Care Act. Dur­ing the botched de­but of Health­Care.gov, in­surers ended up do­ing most of the work the web­site was sup­posed to do, thus win­ning cred­ib­il­ity as the pro­tect­ors of Obama­care. Ig­nagni’s next chal­lenge: what’s shap­ing up to be an all-out war between her in­dustry and phar­ma­ceut­ic­al com­pan­ies over the high cost of pre­scrip­tion drugs.

Cecile Richards (Richard A. Bloom)Cecile Richards, President, Planned Parenthood

Richards is un­doubtedly one of the most power­ful wo­men in Demo­crat­ic polit­ics, and her status keeps grow­ing amid flare-ups ran­ging from Todd Akin to the Su­preme Court’s rul­ing lim­it­ing Obama­care’s con­tra­cep­tion man­date. She leads Planned Par­ent­hood’s day-to-day op­er­a­tions as well as its polit­ic­al arm, put­ting her squarely at the in­ter­sec­tion of health care policy and polit­ics.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×