The solution to the crisis in Iraq is not to break the country up into two or three states, according to a State Department official. The best alternative is to set up a federal system that distributes power to local governments and security forces, allowing for some regional autonomy while keeping the entire country under Baghdad’s federal umbrella.
The official, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Iraq and Iran Brett McGurk, advocated for a “central-regional-provincial” approach to security and governance in front of the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday. In such a system, local citizens would be in charge of securing the regions where they live, with backup from the state (this model apes the U.S. National Guard). The Iraqi Army would “rarely deploy inside cities,” staying back to provide overall support and protect national borders.
The Iraqi constitution calls for a system of “functional federalism,” but such a system was never truly implemented. The State Department wants Iraq to move in the direction of federalism to help it strike a balance between the independence of Iraq’s three main groups — Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds — and the creation and maintenance of a robust, centralized state that can protect itself from outside forces like the current advance of militants belonging to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. “This model of functional federalism is feasible and necessary,” McGurk said.
Rep. Eliot Engel, D-N.Y., pushed back on McGurk’s insistence that Iraq be kept intact. “Iraq is not a real state,” Engel said. “Why should we be obligated to maintain its borders?” McGurk countered by pointing to a developing new government in Iraq, which had its first parliamentary session Wednesday after the election of a new speaker. The body met to elect a president, but postponed that vote until Thursday. The Iraqi government has agreed to elect a Kurdish president, a Shiite prime minister, and a Sunni speaker of the Parliament since 2003.
Administration officials have described the ideal outcome in Iraq as “loose federalism” before, and Zalmay Khalizad and Kenneth Pollack, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and Brookings, respectively, recently called the idea the “least bad solution” for the country. Federalism “is the best outcome for all concerned, including the United States,” they wrote. McGurk’s testimony shows that the Obama administration agrees.
What We're Following See More »
"The Senate standstill over a stopgap spending bill appeared headed toward a resolution on Friday night. Senators who were holding up the measure said votes are expected later in the evening. West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin had raised objections to the continuing resolution because it did not include a full year's extension of retired coal miners' health benefits," but Manchin "said he and other coal state Democrats agreed with Senate Democratic leaders during a caucus meeting Thursday that they would not block the continuing resolution, but rather use the shutdown threat as a way to highlight the health care and pension needs of the miners."
Donald Trump transition team announced Friday afternoon that top supporter Rudy Giuliani has taken himself out of the running to be in Trump's cabinet, though CNN previously reported that it was Trump who informed the former New York City mayor that he would not be receiving a slot. While the field had seemingly been narrowed last week, it appears to be wide open once again, with ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson the current favorite.
The House has completed it's business for 2016 by passing a spending bill which will keep the government funded through April 28. The final vote tally was 326-96. The bill's standing in the Senate is a bit tenuous at the moment, as a trio of Democratic Senators have pledged to block the bill unless coal miners get a permanent extension on retirement and health benefits. The government runs out of money on Friday night.
The Senate passed the National Defense Authorization Act today, sending the $618 billion measure to President Obama. The president vetoed the defense authorization bill a year ago, but both houses could override his disapproval this time around.