A One-Step Guide to Infuriating an EPA Official

The agency chief touts her staff’s work after a Republican accused her committee of kowtowing to a green group.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy.
National Journal
Jason Plautz
Add to Briefcase
Jason Plautz
July 23, 2014, 10:09 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans are ac­cus­ing the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency of let­ting a green group write its land­mark cli­mate rules, and EPA isn’t happy about it.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Bar­rasso of Wyom­ing ac­cused EPA Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy Wed­nes­day of let­ting the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil dic­tate its rules, say­ing the agency had de­ferred to the group’s “power­ful, wealthy, Wash­ing­ton law­yers and lob­by­ists” while writ­ing the agency’s car­bon-pol­lu­tion rules for ex­ist­ing power plants.

“They [the NRDC] have mil­lions, which gives them ac­cess. The EPA has turned a deaf ear on those who don’t,” Bar­rasso said at an En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee hear­ing.

Mc­Carthy wasn’t hav­ing it, and when it came time for ques­tions and an­swers, when Bar­rasso asked why EPA had let NRDC write the rule, Mc­Carthy curtly replied, “We did not.”

Later in the hear­ing, Mc­Carthy said the al­leg­a­tions were a “dis­cred­it” to EPA staff who had worked around the clock to meet with stake­hold­ers from all sides to design the cli­mate rule.

And Mc­Carthy’s Sen­ate al­lies were swift to fire back, with in­de­pend­ent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Ver­mont say­ing it was “re­mark­able that my Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues would dare to raise the is­sue of cam­paign fin­ance” be­fore tick­ing down a list of fig­ures on the spend­ing done by the oil and gas in­dustry.

“Is there money com­ing in­to the polit­ic­al pro­cess from wealthy lib­er­als? The an­swer is yes,” Sanders said. “But that money is clearly dwarfed by the amount of money com­ing in from the fossil-fuel in­dustry.”

The GOP charges come in re­sponse to a New York Times story this month that said a policy out­line draf­ted by the NRDC had served as the “blue­print” for EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which would re­quire emis­sion cuts of 30 per­cent from power plants by 2030. NRDC in 2012 re­leased a pro­pos­al on how to reg­u­late emis­sions from power plants that would have set dif­fer­ent lim­its for states and al­lowed re­gion­al flex­ib­il­ity, a strategy EPA em­braced in its own rule.

EPA has denied that NRDC ex­er­cised clout in writ­ing the rule — a blog post days after the story by Janet Mc­Cabe, act­ing chief of the agency’s air of­fice, de­scribed meet­ing with “lit­er­ally thou­sands” of stake­hold­ers dur­ing the draft­ing pro­cess.

But that hasn’t stopped crit­ics from seiz­ing on the sup­posed in­flu­ence as a sign of what they say is a crooked draft­ing pro­cess. Bar­rasso on Wed­nes­day prom­ised to fol­low up with a doc­u­ment re­quest on NRDC’s role, with a jab at the re­cent dis­clos­ure that EPA had lost some emails due to a hard-drive crash.

“If the an­swer is no, that you will not com­ply, or that there are more re­cord-keep­ing mis­haps, broken hard drives, lost files, then we’ll know the truth about this agency as well,” Bar­rasso said.

What We're Following See More »
CARSON UP NEXT
Zinke Confirmed As Interior Secretary
1 hours ago
BREAKING
GOODLATTE SENDING LETTER TO SESSIONS THIS WEEK
House GOP Blocks Dems on Trump Ethics
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

On a party-line vote, "the House Judiciary Committee defeated a Democratic effort Tuesday to obtain any information the Justice Department has on possible conflicts, ethical violations or improper connections to Russia by President Donald Trump and his associates. The committee’s Republican chairman, Bob Goodlatte, opposed the resolution, even as he acknowledged the Justice Department hasn’t acted on his own request for a briefing on alleged Russian interference with the U.S. election and potential ties to the Trump campaign." He said he'll be sending a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions requesting him to pursue "all legitimate investigative leads" into those matters.

Source:
WAITING FOR NEWS CYCLE TO REFRESH
Trump Holds Off on New Travel Ban
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump won’t sign a revised travel ban on Wednesday as had been anticipated, two senior administration officials confirmed. One of the officials indicated that the delay was due to the busy news cycle, and that when Trump does sign the revised order, he wanted it to get plenty of attention."

Source:
BUT THEY MUST PAY
Donald Trump Affirms Support For NATO
14 hours ago
UPDATE

Near the end of his speech Tuesday, Donald Trump made a firm proclamation affirming his support for NATO. "We strongly support NATO, an alliance forged through the bonds of two World Wars that dethroned fascism, and a Cold War that defeated communism," Trump said. However, he continued on, "our partners must meet their financial obligations."

UNITES GOP
Obamacare Repeal Portion Lacks Specifics
15 hours ago
UPDATE

In his address to a joint session of Congress, Donald Trump called on the two chambers "to repeal and replace Obamacare with reforms that expand choice, increase access, lower costs, and at the same time, provide better Healthcare." The entire section of Republican members of Congress united in a standing ovation, while Democrats sat silently, with some even giving a thumbs down to the cameras. At one point, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was shown shaking her head in disapproval. While Trump called for the repeal and replacement of Obamacare, he failed to give any specifics, though he did say those with preexisting conditions should have access to care and give flexibility back to the states.

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login