Both Parties Looking to Pare Down Obama’s Border Funding

Senate Democrats propose to cut $1 billion from the president’s request; House Republicans are expected to unveil an even deeper cut Wednesday.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 24: U.S. Congresswoman Kay Granger (R-TX) speaks at The Elton John AIDS Foundation and UNAIDS breakfast at the Russell Senate Office Building on July 24, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Michael Kovac/Getty Images for The Elton John AIDS Foundation)
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalini and Billy House
July 22, 2014, 5:38 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are plan­ning on Wed­nes­day to un­veil their own plan to deal with the bor­der crisis that would provide less than half of the $3.7 bil­lion in emer­gency spend­ing re­ques­ted by Pres­id­ent Obama.

In a closed-door meet­ing at the Cap­it­ol, House Ap­pro­pri­ations Chair­man Har­old Ro­gers is to lay out a GOP fund­ing al­tern­at­ive that seni­or aides have de­scribed as between $1.3 bil­lion and $1.5 bil­lion.

Ro­gers him­self said Tues­day that the spend­ing will be en­tirely off­set by cuts else­where in the budget — and geared to provid­ing agen­cies and oth­er op­er­a­tions in­volved in deal­ing with the surge of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors to the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der through Jan. 1.

Mean­while, Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­ers are work­ing on a sup­ple­ment­al spend­ing bill that would grant the White House $1 bil­lion less than it sought to ad­dress the in­flux of minors from Cent­ral Amer­ica at the na­tion’s south­ern bor­der.

Also on Wed­nes­day, Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Kay Granger of Texas is ex­pec­ted to re­lease a “set of prin­ciples” that have been put to­geth­er by her­self and oth­er mem­bers of a House “bor­der work­ing group” cre­ated by Speak­er John Boehner on im­mig­ra­tion policy.

Most of the work­ing group’s policy re­com­mend­a­tions are ex­pec­ted to be­come part of the House Re­pub­lic­an al­tern­at­ive to Obama’s pro­pos­al. They in­clude:

“¢ The need to provide for more Na­tion­al Guard in­volve­ment along the bor­der, in­clud­ing in hu­man­it­ari­an re­lief ef­forts, such as provid­ing food, shel­ter, and health care.

“¢ Chan­ging a 2008 anti-traf­fick­ing law to al­low im­mig­rant chil­dren at the bor­der to be vol­un­tar­ily and more swiftly re­turned to their home coun­tries rather than be­ing held for de­port­a­tion hear­ings. Many Sen­ate and House Demo­crats, in­clud­ing the Con­gres­sion­al His­pan­ic Caucus, have already said they would op­pose this.

“¢ Put­ting an end to the so-called “catch and re­lease” sys­tem for un­ac­com­pan­ied minors, and in­stead re­quir­ing that they be de­tained un­til they see an im­mig­ra­tion judge. The re­com­mend­a­tions will call for this to hap­pen with­in five to sev­en days.

“¢ “Chan­ging the nar­rat­ive” by pro­mot­ing — through ad­vert­ise­ments in Cent­ral Amer­ica — the no­tion that the U.S. will send im­mig­rants back home if they do not cross the bor­der leg­ally.

In the Sen­ate, Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Mikul­ski of Mary­land is craft­ing the $2.7 bil­lion le­gis­la­tion along with lead­er­ship in the hopes of get­ting it to the floor be­fore the Sen­ate re­cesses for Au­gust.

“The United States has an ob­lig­a­tion to help re­solve these crises, but is run­ning out of money,” Mikul­ski said in a state­ment. “The costs are real and ur­gent. We don’t save money by re­fus­ing to act or through delay.”

Demo­crats are slash­ing nearly $1 bil­lion from the pres­id­ent’s re­quest be­cause they’re angling to get Re­pub­lic­an sup­port, a seni­or Demo­crat­ic aide said. Re­pub­lic­ans have signaled they op­pose the pres­id­ent’s re­quest, char­ac­ter­iz­ing it as a blank check, and it’s un­clear wheth­er they’ll back Mikul­ski’s downs­ized ver­sion of the le­gis­la­tion.

An aide to Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell said he had not seen the meas­ure yet, but raised a ques­tion about wheth­er re­forms to leg­al au­thor­it­ies would be in­cluded.

The Sen­ate bill would au­thor­ize the fund­ing through the end of the year, the Demo­crat­ic aide said. It would also in­clude $225 mil­lion for Is­rael’s Iron Dome mis­sile-de­fense sys­tem, which has gained no­tori­ety in re­cent days for its ef­fect­ive­ness in re­pelling rock­ets from Hamas.

The bill will carry $615 mil­lion to ad­dress wild­fires as well.

Left out of the bill are changes to the im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem, which some law­makers had sought.

Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id of Nevada said he’s hope­ful the Sen­ate could pass the meas­ure soon, but he did not guar­an­tee it.

“We feel com­fort­able where we are and would hope that Re­pub­lic­ans would sup­port us,” he said.

The bill’s path to pas­sage is fraught. For one, the Sen­ate has struggled all year with ap­pro­pri­ations meas­ures on the floor, with Re­id and Mc­Con­nell dis­agree­ing over how to pro­ceed on amend­ments. So far, the Sen­ate has passed none of the 12 an­nu­al spend­ing bills.

Contributions by Clara Ritger and Rachel Roubein

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.