Progress Hard to Gauge on Homeland Antimissile Program: Auditors

Then-Missile Defense Agency Director Lt. Gen. Patrick O'Reilly examines a missile-interceptor deployed at Fort Greely, Alaska, in 2010. A new congressional audit finds that the Pentagon is not providing sufficient information to allow a proper progress assessment of a key homeland antimissile system.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
Add to Briefcase
Rachel Oswald
July 22, 2014, 10:18 a.m.

Con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors are com­plain­ing that a dearth of data is mak­ing it dif­fi­cult to judge pro­gress in im­prov­ing a key home­land an­ti­mis­sile sys­tem.

The Pentagon was ordered un­der a 2013 law to re­port to Con­gress on spe­cif­ic ef­forts it was tak­ing to im­prove the per­form­ance of the Ground-Based Mid­course De­fense sys­tem — the coun­try’s prin­cip­al shield against a lim­ited in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­sile strike. Pentagon of­fi­cials even­tu­ally de­livered the as­sess­ment in Feb­ru­ary, sev­en months late.

But while the doc­u­ment lists past and planned ac­tions aimed at tech­no­lo­gic­al en­hance­ments in the pro­gram, it fails to ad­equately ex­plain how those steps would work in bring­ing about im­prove­ments to the sys­tem’s per­form­ance, the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice said in an as­sess­ment re­leased last week.

This lack of im­port­ant con­tex­tu­al in­form­a­tion, aud­it­ors said, is prob­lem­at­ic for con­gres­sion­al de­fense pan­els’ abil­ity to per­form over­sight of the GMD pro­gram, which fi­nally scored a crit­ic­al in­ter­cept win in a June test after years of fail­ures.

“Without an un­der­stand­ing of the ef­fect­ive­ness of these ac­tions and plans, Con­gress may not have the in­form­a­tion it needs when mak­ing dif­fi­cult choices on where to spend lim­ited funds,” the GAO re­port con­cludes.

For ex­ample, the Mis­sile De­fense Agency in­formed Con­gress that it had up­graded the soft­ware of all first- and second-gen­er­a­tion kin­et­ic kill vehicles de­ployed on in­ter­cept­ors un­der the GMD sys­tem. However, the agency “did not de­scribe the ef­fect­ive­ness of these im­prove­ments or wheth­er these im­prove­ments have been con­firmed to work as in­ten­ded in flight tests,” reads the re­port.

Ad­di­tion­ally, while the Mis­sile De­fense Agency dis­cussed its plans to cre­ate a bet­ter sys­tem for es­tim­at­ing in­ter­cept­ors’ re­li­ab­il­ity, the agency failed to dis­close how the new meth­od­o­logy would ac­tu­ally be put in place, ac­cord­ing to aud­it­ors.

Oth­er gaps in in­form­a­tion in­clude the con­tin­ued lack of a timeline for fi­nal­iz­ing a new Ground Based In­ter­cept­or ac­quis­i­tion strategy. This comes in spite of the fact that the Pentagon would need such a strategy be­fore it be­gins the pro­cess of pur­chas­ing 14 more in­ter­cept­ors for de­ploy­ment in Alaska in fisc­al 2018, the GAO re­port says.

What We're Following See More »
MCCONNELL’S BACK AGAINST THE WALL
Heller, Paul Won’t Vote on Motion to Proceed
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
LESS THAN HOUSE BILL
CBO Says 22 Million More Would Be UNinsured
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The Senate bill "would increase the number of people without health insurance by 22 million by 2026, a figure that is only slightly lower than the 23 million more uninsured that the House version would create. Next year, 15 million more people would be uninsured compared with current law...The legislation would decrease federal deficits by a total of $321 billion over a decade."

Source:
ARKANSAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE LAW OVERTURNED
SCOTUS Delivers a Victory for Gay Couples
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of same-sex couples who complained that an Arkansas birth certificate law discriminated against them, reversing a state court’s ruling that married lesbian couples must get a court order to have both spouses listed on their children’s birth certificates."

Source:
63-DAY TRIGGER
Revised Senate Bill Would Add Penalty for Going Uninsured
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
SENT LETTER TODAY
58 House Republicans Ask Ginsburg to Recuse on Travel Ban
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The letter reads in part, "There is no doubt that your impartiality can be reasonably questioned; indeed, it would be unreasonable not to question your impartiality. Failure to recuse yourself from any such case would violate the law and undermine the credibility of the Supreme Court of the United States.” Ginsburg said last year, "He is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login