Progress Hard to Gauge on Homeland Antimissile Program: Auditors

Then-Missile Defense Agency Director Lt. Gen. Patrick O'Reilly examines a missile-interceptor deployed at Fort Greely, Alaska, in 2010. A new congressional audit finds that the Pentagon is not providing sufficient information to allow a proper progress assessment of a key homeland antimissile system.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
July 22, 2014, 10:18 a.m.

Con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors are com­plain­ing that a dearth of data is mak­ing it dif­fi­cult to judge pro­gress in im­prov­ing a key home­land an­ti­mis­sile sys­tem.

The Pentagon was ordered un­der a 2013 law to re­port to Con­gress on spe­cif­ic ef­forts it was tak­ing to im­prove the per­form­ance of the Ground-Based Mid­course De­fense sys­tem — the coun­try’s prin­cip­al shield against a lim­ited in­ter­con­tin­ent­al bal­list­ic mis­sile strike. Pentagon of­fi­cials even­tu­ally de­livered the as­sess­ment in Feb­ru­ary, sev­en months late.

But while the doc­u­ment lists past and planned ac­tions aimed at tech­no­lo­gic­al en­hance­ments in the pro­gram, it fails to ad­equately ex­plain how those steps would work in bring­ing about im­prove­ments to the sys­tem’s per­form­ance, the Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice said in an as­sess­ment re­leased last week.

This lack of im­port­ant con­tex­tu­al in­form­a­tion, aud­it­ors said, is prob­lem­at­ic for con­gres­sion­al de­fense pan­els’ abil­ity to per­form over­sight of the GMD pro­gram, which fi­nally scored a crit­ic­al in­ter­cept win in a June test after years of fail­ures.

“Without an un­der­stand­ing of the ef­fect­ive­ness of these ac­tions and plans, Con­gress may not have the in­form­a­tion it needs when mak­ing dif­fi­cult choices on where to spend lim­ited funds,” the GAO re­port con­cludes.

For ex­ample, the Mis­sile De­fense Agency in­formed Con­gress that it had up­graded the soft­ware of all first- and second-gen­er­a­tion kin­et­ic kill vehicles de­ployed on in­ter­cept­ors un­der the GMD sys­tem. However, the agency “did not de­scribe the ef­fect­ive­ness of these im­prove­ments or wheth­er these im­prove­ments have been con­firmed to work as in­ten­ded in flight tests,” reads the re­port.

Ad­di­tion­ally, while the Mis­sile De­fense Agency dis­cussed its plans to cre­ate a bet­ter sys­tem for es­tim­at­ing in­ter­cept­ors’ re­li­ab­il­ity, the agency failed to dis­close how the new meth­od­o­logy would ac­tu­ally be put in place, ac­cord­ing to aud­it­ors.

Oth­er gaps in in­form­a­tion in­clude the con­tin­ued lack of a timeline for fi­nal­iz­ing a new Ground Based In­ter­cept­or ac­quis­i­tion strategy. This comes in spite of the fact that the Pentagon would need such a strategy be­fore it be­gins the pro­cess of pur­chas­ing 14 more in­ter­cept­ors for de­ploy­ment in Alaska in fisc­al 2018, the GAO re­port says.

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
16 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×