Why Obama and Boehner are So Cautious About the Malaysian Jetliner

A firefighter sprays water to extinguish a fire, on July 17, 2014 shows flames amongst the wreckages of the malaysian airliner carrying 298 people from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur after it crashed, near the town of Shaktarsk, in rebel-held east Ukraine. There were 298 people, including 154 Dutch nationals, on board the Malaysia Airlines flight that crashed in strife-torn eastern Ukraine on Thursday, an official from the carrier said. AFP PHOTO/DOMINIQUE FAGET (Photo credit should read DOMINIQUE FAGET/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
July 17, 2014, 4:14 p.m.

While the cable chan­nels were ex­plod­ing in spec­u­la­tion from one pan­el of ex­perts after an­oth­er Thursday fol­low­ing the Malay­si­an air­liner tragedy, the most cau­tious pub­lic re­ac­tions came from Pres­id­ent Obama and Speak­er John Boehner. Both were low-key. The pres­id­ent spoke of find­ing out “what happened and why.” The speak­er called for pray­ers while “we await the facts.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5105) }}

The cau­tion was for good reas­on. Al­most al­ways in such in­cid­ents, the im­me­di­ate cer­tain­ties prove wrong. When a bomb downed Pan Am Flight 103 in 1988, for ex­ample, U.S. in­tel­li­gence ini­tially was con­vinced that Syr­ia was to blame. It turned out to be Libya. Both Obama and Boehner un­der­stand the scarcity of Amer­ic­an in­tel­li­gence re­sources in the sec­tion of Ukraine where the plane fell to the ground and they un­der­stand that it may take some time to as­cer­tain ex­actly what happened and who fired the fatal mis­sile.

But even as the world waits for those an­swers, it is not too early to con­clude that the po­ten­tial im­pact on the war over Ukraine is great. Already, back­ers of the Kiev gov­ern­ment be­lieve the in­cid­ent has placed Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin on the de­fens­ive and brought home the real­ity that the sep­ar­at­ists are fight­ing with weapons giv­en them by Rus­sia.

“This can change the nar­rat­ive of the con­flict be­ing solely a homegrown sep­ar­at­ist move­ment and a nar­rat­ive mainly writ­ten by Rus­sia to an op­por­tun­ity for Ukraine and the West to show that Rus­sia is man­u­fac­tur­ing much of the con­flict and thus needs to be thwarted,” said Ro­man Popa­di­uk, the first Amer­ic­an am­bas­sad­or to Ukraine after the coun­try be­came in­de­pend­ent. “From a PR per­spect­ive, this could be a game changer,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al.

An­thony H. Cordes­man, the former dir­ect­or of in­tel­li­gence as­sess­ment for the sec­ret­ary of De­fense and now at the Cen­ter for Stra­tegic and In­ter­na­tion­al Stud­ies, is more cau­tious. He said people already should have known that Rus­sia had giv­en sur­face-to-air mis­siles to the rebels since they had already shot down two Ukrain­i­an planes. Cit­ing the Lock­er­bie pre­ced­ent, he said “there is reas­on here for pa­tience.” He also doubted that the situ­ation on the ground in Ukraine had changed much in the hours after the plane was shot down.

“We’ve for­got­ten that the morn­ing began with con­cern that the Rus­si­ans had moved 12,000 troops back to the bor­der, which may or may not be af­fected by the air­liner crash. But, cer­tainly, it won’t have changed in­stant­an­eously,” he said.

Already, though, Popa­di­uk sees the po­ten­tial for changes that would be im­port­ant dip­lo­mat­ic­ally and for Obama’s ef­forts to rally the West to stand stronger against Putin through sanc­tions. The down­ing of the plane, said Popa­di­uk, “will fur­ther unite the Ukrain­i­ans and also em­bolden the Ukrain­i­an mil­it­ary since it will show the world that Ukraine is not just fa­cing a sep­ar­at­ist is­sue but also fight­ing a shad­ow war against Rus­sia.” Ad­di­tion­ally, he said, it “will put pres­sure on the West to come up with more sanc­tions in a quick­er time frame…. And it may start chan­ging pub­lic opin­ion in West­ern coun­tries to a more pro-Ukrain­i­an po­s­i­tion, which will make their gov­ern­ments’ de­cisions on sanc­tions much easi­er.”

It is too early to know, but if the pres­sure on Mo­scow does in­crease be­cause of this, there could be more pres­sure by Putin on the sep­ar­at­ists to en­gage in ne­go­ti­ations with Kiev and there may be more of a move on Cap­it­ol Hill to grant Ukraine’s re­quest for more de­fens­ive mil­it­ary equip­ment and aid. That will not be clear, though, un­til the smoke clears from the crash and Amer­ic­an in­tel­li­gence gath­ers enough an­swers that Obama and Boehner can safely move bey­ond the safe gen­er­al­it­ies of Thursday.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×