How to Renounce America and Still Be Called a Patriot

Her father is a senator, she’s a CEO, and her company is forsaking its U.S. citizenship.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ron Fournier
July 16, 2014, 5:58 p.m.

This story is about a gil­ded class of people and cor­por­a­tions en­riched by the new Amer­ic­an eco­nomy while the rest of its cit­izens pay the tab. The prot­ag­on­ists could be any num­ber of in­sti­tu­tion­al elites, but this column hap­pens to be about a Demo­crat­ic sen­at­or from West Vir­gin­ia, Joe Manchin, and his daugh­ter, Heath­er Bresch, the chief ex­ec­ut­ive of Mylan, a gi­ant maker of gen­er­ic drugs based out­side Pitt­s­burgh.

Her com­pany’s profits come largely from Medi­caid and Medi­care, which means her nest is feathered by U.S. tax­pay­ers. On Monday, Bresch an­nounced that Mylan will re­nounce its United States cit­izen­ship and in­stead be­come in­cor­por­ated in the Neth­er­lands — leav­ing this coun­try, in part, to pay less in taxes.

This is the sort of story that makes blood boil in pop­u­lists — voters from the Eliza­beth War­ren wing of the Demo­crat­ic Party to liber­tari­ans who fol­low Rand Paul and in­clud­ing tea party con­ser­vat­ives. These dis­il­lu­sioned souls, grow­ing in num­bers, hate hy­po­crites who con­demn the U.S. polit­ic­al sys­tem while gam­ing it.

Pop­u­lists can’t be happy with how this story was told by An­drew Ross Sor­kin of the New York Times. Un­der the head­line “Re­luct­antly, Pat­ri­ot Flees Home­land for Green­er Tax Pas­tures,” Sor­kin cast Bresch as a help­less vic­tim of a sys­tem that has made her wealthy and her fath­er power­ful.

Heath­er Bresch grew up around polit­ics. Her fath­er is Joe Manchin, the Demo­crat­ic sen­at­or from West Vir­gin­ia and a former gov­ernor. She has heard him say re­peatedly, “We live in the greatest coun­try on Earth,” as he did in count­less polit­ic­al ad­vert­ise­ments. And it ap­peared to rub off on her: Ms. Bresch was named a “Pat­ri­ot of the Year” in 2011 by Es­quire magazine for help­ing to push through the F.D.A. Safety In­nov­a­tion Act.

Ah, so she’s a pat­ri­ot. Bresch told Sor­kin that she en­gin­eered the com­pany’s di­vorce from the United States “re­luct­antly,” and, the re­port­er ad­ded, “she genu­inely seems to mean it.” That cred­u­lous line was fol­lowed by two para­graphs about cor­por­ate tax rates, an im­port­ant re­mind­er of how slowly polit­ic­al and busi­ness lead­ers are ad­apt­ing to the glob­al, tech-in­fused eco­nomy.

If Ms. Bresch’s deal is not a call to Wash­ing­ton to ad­dress what is clearly a grow­ing trend that it has re­mained nearly si­lent on, the na­tion will most likely con­tin­ue to lose large em­ploy­ers and tax­pay­ers in droves to coun­tries with lower tax rates. Al­most 20 large United States com­pan­ies have an­nounced plans to give up their United States cit­izen­ship over the last two years. Just on Monday, the Ir­ish drug maker Shire cleared the way for a mer­ger with Ab­bVie, the drug maker based in Chica­go, and Wal­green is con­sid­er­ing an in­ver­sion through a deal with Al­li­ance Boots, a European drug­store chain.

“It’s not like I’ve not been vo­cal and up there talk­ing to any­body who’d listen to me,” Ms. Bresch told me in an in­ter­view about the cru­sade she had been on in Wash­ing­ton for years, talk­ing to law­makers about over­haul­ing the cor­por­ate tax code to make United States com­pan­ies more com­pet­it­ive. “But you know what they all say? ‘Yeah, uh huh, O.K. Uh huh.’ “

That’s ripe. The daugh­ter of a U.S. sen­at­or and former gov­ernor — a Pat­ri­ot of the Year, no less — says she got lip-ser­vice from Con­gress. Just like you and me.

To his cred­it, Sor­kin says there is something “mor­ally dis­con­cert­ing” about a com­pany bolt­ing a coun­try that is among its biggest cus­tom­ers. Still, he writes, Bresch “in­sists that the mer­ger is be­ing driv­en mostly by its stra­tegic mer­its, and that the lower tax rate is just an ad­ded be­ne­fit.” OK, now. That’s hard to swal­low. How much in taxes will she save by jilt­ing the United States?

Ms. Bresch, who said the com­pany’s cur­rent ef­fect­ive tax rate is about 25 per­cent, said the rate would come down to 21 per­cent in the first year of the deal and then move in­to the high teens after three to five years. Mylan will con­tin­ue to pay taxes in the United States on its do­mest­ic profits, but not on its busi­ness op­er­a­tions abroad.

All of which raises an im­port­ant ques­tion: Even if the United States were to re­vamp its cor­por­ate tax code, how low would the rate have to drop to be com­pet­it­ive and still raise enough rev­en­ue to pay for the ser­vices that cit­izens ex­pect?

Cor­por­ate taxes will go as low as or­din­ary voters can stand it, no doubt, be­cause their rates are de­term­ined by power­ful spe­cial in­terests and elites like Bresch and her fath­er. Manchin wouldn’t speak to me, but he did is­sue a nugat­ory state­ment to Sor­kin — something about be­ing “dis­ap­poin­ted” when U.S. com­pan­ies “feel the need to move over­seas be­cause of the U.S. tax code.”

Too bad Manchin isn’t in a pos­tion to feel the need and find a way to keep Mylan pay­ing taxes to the United States, the coun­try that pre­sum­ably will con­tin­ue to en­rich her firm via Medi­care and Medi­caid. Would he try to cut fed­er­al drug pay­ments to Mylan by roughly the amount of taxes his daugh­ter is tak­ing to the Neth­er­lands? I don’t know, be­cause my call to the sen­at­or’s of­fice was not re­turned.

As for Amer­ic­ans less priv­ileged and power­ful than these two char­ac­ters, your role is clear: Just cast your votes and pay the bills.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login