On ‘Ukrainian Day,’ Obama Slaps Russia and Wins Praise

The president’s announcement of stiffer sanctions against Moscow is broadly welcomed.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 16: U.S. President Barack Obama speaks about foreign policy in the Middle East and the Ukraine in the Brady Press Briefing Room on July 16, 2014 in Washington, DC. Obama formally announced new sanctions on Russia over increasing tensions on the Ukrainian border. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
July 16, 2014, 4:03 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama’s an­nounce­ment of tough­er sanc­tions on Rus­sia on Wed­nes­day was well timed to head off great­er cri­ti­cism of his Ukraine policy in Con­gress and to blunt what had been a rising clam­or in the Ukrain­i­an-Amer­ic­an com­munity. It stopped short of in­clud­ing the pun­ish­ing strikes that would have laid waste to whole sec­tors of the Rus­si­an eco­nomy, but it sent a mes­sage to Vladi­mir Putin that was wel­comed by many of those who had been most frus­trated by the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s meas­ured re­ac­tion to the on­go­ing vi­ol­ence in east­ern Ukraine.

In many ways, the tim­ing could not have been bet­ter. Wed­nes­day was “Ukrain­i­an Day” on Cap­it­ol Hill, a self-de­scribed “ad­vocacy event” that brought more than 100 Ukrain­i­an-Amer­ic­ans to Wash­ing­ton. They fanned out to the of­fices of sup­port­ive sen­at­ors and mem­bers of the House, all in an ef­fort to force the pres­id­ent to im­pose sanc­tions on Rus­sia that were tough­er than any­thing pre­vi­ously im­posed.

Al­ex­an­der B. Kuzma, an of­fi­cial with the Ukrain­i­an Cath­ol­ic Edu­ca­tion Found­a­tion and one of those who helped or­gan­ize the as­sault on the Hill, at noon voiced “def­in­ite deep dis­ap­point­ment” with the lack of fur­ther sanc­tions. Point­ing to the gov­ern­ment’s on­go­ing fight­ing with sep­ar­at­ist forces on the bor­der with Rus­sia, he said the Ukrain­i­an com­munity “is not just alarmed but start­ing to feel tre­mend­ous anxi­ety” that a full-scale Rus­si­an in­va­sion of Ukraine may be im­min­ent. Speak­ing to re­port­ers, Kuzma pleaded for the White House to “send a mes­sage” to Putin.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5083) }}

Only four hours later, Obama sent that mes­sage to Putin, to Kuzma and his fel­low Ukrain­i­an lob­by­ists, and to the mem­bers of Con­gress who had been call­ing for stronger ac­tion tar­geted against the en­ergy and fin­an­cial sec­tors of the Rus­si­an eco­nomy. Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Bob Cork­er of Ten­ness­ee, the rank­ing mem­ber of the For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee, called the new move “def­in­itely a step in the right dir­ec­tion.” Lament­ing that “the delay in im­pos­ing real costs on Rus­sia has been dam­aging to U.S. cred­ib­il­ity,” he prom­ised to “con­tin­ue to urge the ad­min­is­tra­tion to ratchet up even more pres­sure if Putin does not change his be­ha­vi­or.”

Ro­man Popa­di­uk, a top of­fi­cial in the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Coun­cil un­der Pres­id­ent George H.W. Bush, and the first U.S. am­bas­sad­or to Ukraine when the coun­try broke free of the So­viet Uni­on, also noted that the ac­tion falls short of the broad sec­tor­al sanc­tions called for by many Ukrain­i­ans. “But I see this over­all as a very pos­it­ive step on the part of the ad­min­is­tra­tion. It sends a very strong sig­nal to the Rus­si­ans of our re­solve and lays the ground­work for widen­ing these sanc­tions and shows that we are not afraid to do so.”

Popa­di­uk ad­ded that the new sanc­tions end a peri­od of in­ac­tion that could have misled Putin in­to think­ing there would be no fur­ther cost to his sup­port for the sep­ar­at­ists and his use of the Rus­si­an mil­it­ary to shoot down a Ukrain­i­an trans­port plane on Monday. “The long, drawn-out time peri­od between the last set of sanc­tions and today may have led the Rus­si­ans to be­lieve that they might have a little bit more flex­ib­il­ity, play­ing the game of sup­port­ing the sep­ar­at­ists while mak­ing them­selves look like they were for peace and ne­go­ti­ation,” he told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “This shows the Rus­si­ans we are on to what they are up to and you can’t play that game any­more.”

A seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial, speak­ing on back­ground to re­port­ers, made it clear that the pres­id­ent ac­ted after get­ting fed up with the Rus­si­an fail­ure to be­have in the re­gion. “We’ve made clear time and again that if Rus­sia does not re­spect Ukraine’s sov­er­eignty and ter­rit­ori­al in­teg­rity and does not, in good faith, fol­low through on ne­ces­sary com­mit­ments for de-es­cal­a­tion, that we’ll move to im­pose ad­di­tion­al costs,” said the of­fi­cial. “That’s what we’re do­ing today.”

An­oth­er seni­or of­fi­cial noted that the situ­ation had be­come more dire as the fight­ing in­tens­i­fied in Ukraine. “Es­pe­cially over the past sev­er­al weeks, the Rus­si­an gov­ern­ment has chosen to es­cal­ate its un­law­ful activ­it­ies in Ukraine and has chosen to do so in the face of very clear mes­sages that con­tinu­ing down that path will lead to in­creas­ing sanc­tions pres­sures.”

The an­nounce­ment was timed to co­in­cide with a meet­ing in Brus­sels of the heads of the European Uni­on. U.S. of­fi­cials down­played the fact that the E.U. and Wash­ing­ton have not al­ways been in sync on the best blend of sanc­tions. “We do ex­pect the Europeans to take ac­tion. We’ve al­ways said that we’ll take dif­fer­ent types of ac­tions based on our ap­proach to sanc­tions, but we’re pleased that there re­mains close co­ordin­a­tion,” said one of­fi­cial. The im­port­ant thing, ad­ded the oth­er of­fi­cial, is that the new­est sanc­tions “will only fur­ther ex­acer­bate Rus­sia’s eco­nom­ic prob­lems, and these prob­lems are quite sub­stan­tial.”

In his an­nounce­ment of the sanc­tions in the White House Brief­ing Room, the pres­id­ent said he now hopes “the Rus­si­an lead­er­ship will see once again that its ac­tions in Ukraine have con­sequences, in­clud­ing a weak­en­ing Rus­si­an eco­nomy and in­creas­ing dip­lo­mat­ic isol­a­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×