America today is experiencing the most kaleidoscopic demographic change since the Melting Pot era more than a century ago. After an historic wave of immigration that began in 1965, minorities now comprise nearly 40 percent of the overall population and almost half of the under-18 population. Recently, the federal government projected that students of color will represent a majority of all public school K-12 students nationwide beginning this September.
Diversity is simultaneously deepening in cities where it is already well-established—from New York City to Miami, and Houston to Los Angeles—and bringing the great wave of immigration into places that have not historically felt those currents. From 2000 to 2010, the Census Bureau reports, Hispanics provided a majority of the population growth in 18 states. Though smaller overall, the Asian population shows similar trends: it is burgeoning not only in familiar Southern California, but also in the communities around Indianapolis, Columbus (OH), Des Moines, and Minneapolis. In many places, these “new” minorities are joining established African-American communities to create an increasingly complex but also rich mosaic.
Both the deepening of diversity in places where it is established, and its arrival in places where it is not, is creating opportunities and challenges as communities grapple with changes that immigrants and other new arrivals bring to neighborhoods, workplaces, and schools. Few dynamics will shape American life more in the years ahead than how our communities adapt to this transformation.
In the coming months, the Next America project will bring these historic changes to life through a unique series of grassroots reports exploring how communities around the U.S. are responding to growing diversity and changing demographics. We call this report Population 2043. That refers to the year the Census Bureau projects that the groups now considered racial and ethnic minorities will constitute a majority of the American population. But as these reports will make clear, when it comes to forging a new, diverse American identity in our communities large and small, the future is now. —Ronald Brownstein, editorial director, Atlantic Media
What We're Following See More »
The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."
"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."
"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "
"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.