Opinion

End of Life Care Advocate Never Talked With Her Own Dad About His Wishes

Unlike many of the other health disparities that impact the African-American community, this is one over which we have some control.

National Journal
Brandi Alexander
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brandi Alexander
July 16, 2014, 1:05 a.m.

Brandi Al­ex­an­der is the re­gion­al cam­paign and out­reach man­ager for Com­pas­sion & Choices, the na­tion’s lead­ing, non-profit end-of-life choice ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tion. (Cour­tesy photo)

The day my fath­er died from pro­state can­cer — Jan 11, 2011 — is the day I de­cided that no fam­ily should ever ex­per­i­ence the same pain. That day everything changed for me. I had worked for sev­en years at an or­gan­iz­a­tion whose sole fo­cus is end-of-life care, yet I had not had even one con­ver­sa­tion with my fath­er about his end-of-life wishes. It was truly a wake-up call, an eye-open­ing ex­per­i­ence I hope I nev­er have to re­peat.

Ima­gine sit­ting in a hos­pit­al room with your un­re­spons­ive fath­er, your five sib­lings on one side of the bed, and his new wife and her five chil­dren on the oth­er side. It was like a stare-down ses­sion be­fore a big com­pet­it­ive match. People on both sides thought they were best equipped to speak on my fath­er’s be­half. The sad real­ity is that none of us — not one of the 11 people in that room — had a clue about what he wanted. He had no ad­vance dir­ect­ive, had nev­er had a ser­i­ous con­ver­sa­tion about his end-of-life wishes, not even with me: an end-of-life care ad­voc­ate.

Since that fate­ful day three-and-a-half years ago, I have learned that hor­rible situ­ations at the end of life are far too com­mon in this coun­try, es­pe­cially among people of col­or, and the Afric­an-Amer­ic­an com­munity in par­tic­u­lar. In fact, ac­cord­ing to the 2002 In­sti­tute of Medi­cine Re­port, “Un­equal Treat­ment: Con­front­ing Ra­cial and Eth­nic Dis­par­it­ies in Health Care,” Afric­an Amer­ic­ans are ”dy­ing from treat­able and pre­vent­able ill­nesses with more fre­quency than oth­er eth­nic groups. The re­search in­dic­ates that ra­cial and eth­nic minor­it­ies are less likely to re­ceive even routine med­ic­al pro­ced­ures and ex­per­i­ence a lower qual­ity of health ser­vices,” even when in­sured. Ex­perts also say this dis­par­ity means pa­tients are more likely to dis­trust ter­min­al and oth­er­wise grim dia­gnoses, en­dure un­wanted med­ic­al treat­ments, and ex­per­i­ence un­ne­ces­sary pain and fam­ily strife.

Un­like many of the oth­er dis­par­it­ies that im­pact the Afric­an-Amer­ic­an com­munity, this is one we have more con­trol over. It starts with hav­ing a con­ver­sa­tion. Only 50 per­cent of Afric­an Amer­ic­ans have talked with fam­ily mem­bers about their wishes for end-of-life care, and 20 per­cent have not talked to any­one about this in­ev­it­able is­sue, ac­cord­ing to re­search con­duc­ted in 2003 by the Duke Di­vin­ity School and the Na­tion­al Hos­pice and Pal­li­at­ive Care Or­gan­iz­a­tion (NHPCO).

Afric­an Amer­ic­ans and oth­er minor­it­ies un­der­use pal­li­at­ive and hos­pice care even when they have ac­cess to it. Afric­an Amer­ic­ans, for ex­ample, make up about 13 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion and rep­res­ent only eight per­cent of pa­tients who par­ti­cip­ate in hos­pice care. At the same time, white Amer­ic­ans make up about 78 per­cent of the total pop­u­la­tion and 83 per­cent of hos­pice care pa­tients, ac­cord­ing to NHPCO.

Edu­ca­tion about avail­able re­sources is a must. Far too of­ten, people as­so­ci­ate hos­pice with “giv­ing up” and “the place one goes to die.” That is just not the case; hos­pice ac­tu­ally fosters good end-of-life care, and the earli­er the pa­tient ac­cesses these ser­vices, the bet­ter off he or she is. For ex­ample, pa­tients with non-small-cell lung can­cer who re­ceived pal­li­at­ive care lived nearly three months longer on av­er­age than those who did not re­ceive pal­li­at­ive care, ac­cord­ing to a 2010 study pub­lished in The New Eng­land Journ­al of Medi­cine. Pal­li­at­ive and hos­pice care are one of the best ways to en­sure a good death, whatever that may mean to each in­di­vidu­al.

People of col­or have a long his­tory of poor ac­cess to health­care and lower qual­ity health­care in this coun­try. There­fore, it’s not sur­pris­ing that stud­ies pub­lished in the Journ­al of Clin­ic­al Eth­ics in 1993, the Journ­al of Amer­ic­an Geri­at­ric So­ci­ety in 1999, Journ­al of Transcul­tur­al Nurs­ing in 2000 and Journ­al of Health & Aging in 2000 all con­cluded that more Afric­an-Amer­ic­an pa­tients and phys­i­cians fa­vor ag­gress­ive life-pro­long­ing treat­ment in the face of ter­min­al ill­ness than their white peers.

The med­ic­al com­munity could in­crease the re­cept­ive­ness of people of col­or to en­ga­ging in end-of-life dis­cus­sions just by chan­ging the nature of the con­ver­sa­tion. In­quir­ing about all of the treat­ment op­tions pa­tients want — wheth­er they are life-sus­tain­ing or not — is a good way to start the con­ver­sa­tion. That would en­gender great­er levels of trust in health­care pro­viders than a con­ver­sa­tion framed around when and how to dis­con­tin­ue care or turn off life-sus­tain­ing equip­ment.

Afric­an Amer­ic­ans’ end-of-life choices are also in­flu­enced by shared cul­tur­al be­liefs in the role of fam­ily and oth­ers in de­cision-mak­ing, and the im­port­ance of spir­itu­al­ity. As the New Liv­ing Trans­la­tion of the Bible (Pro­verbs 27:12) says, “A prudent per­son fore­sees danger and takes pre­cau­tions. The sim­pleton goes blindly on and suf­fers the con­sequences.”

Be­ing pre­pared is not dis­respect­ful to one’s re­li­gious faith and per­son­al be­liefs. It does not af­fect the abil­ity to be cured or to be blessed with a mir­acle, if that’s what one be­lieves. For ex­ample, Rev. Madis­on Shockley, an Afric­an-Amer­ic­an United Church of Christ pas­tor and vo­cal sup­port­er of Com­pas­sion & Choices, re­cently dis­cussed los­ing his fath­er in a blog post: “The mo­ment of death is a sac­red mo­ment, and it’s of­ten pain­ful emo­tion­ally, phys­ic­ally and spir­itu­ally. But when it can be right, it’s a real bless­ing to every­one. A per­son can be faith­ful and also wel­come death.”

These are com­plex is­sues, ones with which Amer­ic­ans do not wrestle alone. On Sunday, one of the world’s pree­m­in­ent re­li­gious lead­ers, the re­tired Arch­bish­op Des­mond Tutu, re­versed his pub­lic po­s­i­tion on end-of-life care and de­cision-mak­ing. In one of Bri­tain’s largest news­pa­pers, The [Lon­don] Ob­serv­er, he an­nounced his sup­port for a Brit­ish bill modeled after Ore­gon’s Death With Dig­nity Act. It would al­low ter­min­ally ill, men­tally com­pet­ent adults with a pro­gnos­is of less than six months to live to re­quest a doc­tor’s pre­scrip­tion that they could self-ad­min­is­ter to end their dy­ing pro­cess if their suf­fer­ing be­comes un­bear­able. Tutu de­scribed him­self as an ad­voc­ate of dig­nity for the liv­ing and the dy­ing.

At the end of life, Afric­an Amer­ic­ans are no dif­fer­ent than any­one else in this coun­try. We die too. We also want autonomy, choice and peace­ful life end­ings. We must step up as a com­munity and start think­ing and talk­ing about end-of-life de­cisions, be­cause without it we suf­fer.

Death is in­ev­it­able, so wheth­er you want every treat­ment op­tion avail­able or none at all, it’s im­per­at­ive to make sure it is clear to those who mat­ter and to pick a health­care proxy that you know will en­sure that your end-of-life wishes are honored. Any­one can start this pro­cess by call­ing Com­pas­sion & Choices’ toll-free end-of-life con­sulta­tion ser­vice, 800.247.7421, and vis­it­ing our web­site, www.Com­pas­sion­AndChoices.org, where one can ac­cess state-spe­cif­ic ad­vance dir­ect­ives and the Good-to-Go Tool Kit, all free of charge.

The most lov­ing thing you can do is to make your wishes known to your loved ones, of­fi­cially in writ­ing as well as through can­did dis­cus­sions. Un­for­tu­nately, be­cause our fam­ily failed to take these steps, we watched my fath­er die a hor­rible and pain­ful death.

If I had the foresight to dis­cuss my fath­er’s choices with him, we could have spent his last days hon­or­ing his life in­stead of fight­ing over his death.

Brandi Al­ex­an­der is the re­gion­al cam­paign & out­reach man­ager for Com­pas­sion & Choices, the na­tion’s lead­ing, non-profit end-of-life choice ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tion.

 

HAVE AN OPIN­ION ON POLICY AND CHAN­GING DEMO­GRAPH­ICS? The Next Amer­ica wel­comes op-ed pieces that ex­plore the polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic, and so­cial im­pacts of the pro­found ra­cial and cul­tur­al changes fa­cing our na­tion, par­tic­u­larly rel­ev­ant to edu­ca­tion, eco­nomy, the work­force and health. In­ter­ested in sub­mit­ting a piece? Email Jan­ell Ross at jross@na­tion­al­journ­al.com with a brief pitch. Please fol­low us onTwit­ter andFace­book.

What We're Following See More »
$618 BILLION IN FUNDING
By a Big Margin, House Passes Defense Bill
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The National Defense Authorization Act passed the House this morning by a 375-34 vote. The bill, which heads to the Senate next week for final consideration, would fund the military to the tune of $618.7 billion, "about $3.2 billion more than the president requested for fiscal 2017. ... The White House has issued a veto threat on both the House and Senate-passed versions of the bill, but has not yet said if it will sign the compromise bill released by the conference committee this week."

Source:
SUCCEEDS UPTON
Walden to Chair Energy and Commerce Committee
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Republicans have elected Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) the next chairman of the powerful House Energy and Commerce Committee. Walden defeated Reps. John Shimkus (R-IL) and Joe Barton (R-TX), the former committee chairman, in the race for the gavel" to succeed Michgan's Fred Upton.

Source:
BIPARTISAN SUPPORT
Senators Looking to Limit Deportations Under Trump
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Democratic and Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee are working on legislation that would limit deportations" under President-elect Donald Trump. Leading the effort are Judiciary Committee members Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) is also expected to sign on.

Source:
REQUIRES CHANGE IN LAW
Trump Taps Mattis for Defense Secretary
2 days ago
BREAKING

Donald Trump has selected retired Marine Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis as his secretary of defense, according to The Washington Post. Mattis retired from active duty just four years ago, so Congress will have "to pass new legislation to bypass a federal law that states secretaries of defense must not have been on active duty in the previous seven years." The official announcement is likely to come next week.

Source:
MEASURE HEADED TO OBAMA
Senate OKs 10-Year Extension of Iran Sanctions
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login