Imagine a volunteer for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Arkansas, trying to assist Rep. Tom Cotton in his race against Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor, knocks on a voter’s door in Little Rock and discovers the potential GOP supporter owns a gun.
In the world of voter outreach, it’s a potentially crucial piece of information; with the right pitch from a group like the National Rifle Association, for instance, it could prove decisive in getting that voter to pull the lever for Cotton. Except, in years past, it’s also the kind of information that the two separate groups would never share with each other, at least not by November.
Beginning this week, Republicans are trying to change that. Data Trust — a privately operated entity backed by the Republican National Committee that maintains a master list of voter information nationwide — is rolling out a marquee technical upgrade that will allow Republican campaigns and their allies to share voter information with one another in real time. The new feature will let campaigns and approved outside groups not only access voter information anytime (with their own data software) but update it instantly, so others viewing the voter lists can see the information immediately.
Hypothetically, if the Chamber of Commerce and NRA both used Data Trust, the gun-rights group could learn about the Little Rock gun owner minutes after the chamber reached out to him or her, and have its own volunteer on the voter’s doorstep the next day.
The data-sharing upgrade is a potentially important development for the midterm elections; its designers hope campaigns will have enough time in the next four months to adopt the upgrade. But perhaps more importantly, it is a not-insignificant milestone in the Republican Party’s years-long effort to close the so-called “data and technological divide” between itself and Democrats. Democratic candidates and their allies’ effective use of data is one reason their political operations were considered superior in the 2012 elections, and why Republicans vowed in the aftermath of those races to improve their own capabilities.
It’s also something that’s available not just to behemoths like the chamber, NRA, or major Senate campaigns but to the smallest of operations, John DeStefano, president of Data Trust, told National Journal in an interview. The hope, he said, is that all allies of the Republican Party can work together to build an unrivaled “foundation” of voter information.
“It’s a huge step,” he said. “I think we as a party, if we’re going to be successful, we need to get everybody — from the individual computer-science-majoring college Republican to the large accomplished data firms — on the same page and all working toward the same goal. And this helps accomplish that.”
Hurdles remain. For one thing, every one of the hundreds if not thousands of Republican groups will have to adopt the system and then use it correctly. And Republicans have been reluctant in the past to share information with even their allies, part of what many operatives say is a cultural problem with the party that is its main obstacle to catching Democrats on the data and tech front.
And even if all goes according to plan, it’s not as if Democrats don’t have the same capability already.
“I’m not sure the way to measure our success is based on where Democrats are and where they have been,” DeStefano said. “We took a hard look at what we needed to do to get our team on the same page. … As long as we as a party can continue to work together to get folks to understand how important it is to share as much info as we can, we’re going to be successful.”
Data Trust was picked by party leaders in spring of 2013 for an exclusive data-sharing agreement with the RNC, with the idea being that a privately held company could become the de-facto clearinghouse for all voter information for the Republican Party.
Clarification: This story has been updated to reflect Data Trust’s exclusive data-sharing agreement with the RNC.
What We're Following See More »
"As Donald Trump captures the mantle of presumptive Republican nominee, a new poll finds he begins his general election campaign well behind Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. The new CNN/ORC Poll, completed ahead of Trump's victory last night, found Clinton leads 54% to 41%, a 13-point edge over the New York businessman, her largest lead since last July. Clinton is also more trusted than Trump on many issues voters rank as critically important, with one big exception. By a 50% to 45% margin, voters say Trump would do a better job handling the economy than Clinton would."
In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal sets out to relieve conservatives of the temptation to back a third-party candidate over Donald Trump. "The thought is more tempting this year than most, but it’s still hard to see how this would accomplish more than electing Hillary Clinton and muddling the message from a Trump defeat. ... The usual presidential result is that the party that splinters hands the election to the other, more united party." But in the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol is having none of it: "Serious people, including serious conservatives, cannot acquiesce in Donald Trump as their candidate. ... Donald Trump should not be president of the United States. The Wall Street Journal cannot bring itself to say that. We can say it, we do say it, and we are proud to act accordingly."
- Nate Cohn, New York Times: "There have been 10-point shifts over the general election season before, even if it’s uncommon. But there isn’t much of a precedent for huge swings in races with candidates as well known as Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. A majority of Americans may not like her, but they say they’re scared of him."
- Roger Simon, PJ Media: "He is particularly fortunate that his opposition, Hillary Clinton, besides still being under threat of indictment and still not having defeated Bernie Sanders (go figure), is a truly uninspiring, almost soporific, figure. ... She's not a star. Trump is. All attention will be on him in the general election. The primaries have shown us what an advantage that is. What that means for American politics may not all be good, but it's true."
- The editors, The Washington Examiner: "At the very least, Trump owes it to the country he boasts he will 'make great again' to try to demonstrate some seriousness about the office he seeks. He owes this even to those who will never consider voting for him. He can start by swearing off grand displays of aggressive and apparently deliberate ignorance. This is not too much to ask."
Humana announced it plans to "exit certain statewide individual markets and products 'both on and off [Obamacare] exchange,' the insurer said in its financial results released Monday." The company also said price hikes may be forthcoming, "commensurate with anticipated levels of risk by state." Its individual-market enrollment was down 21% in the first quarter from a year ago.