SPOTLIGHT

Breaking Down the Florida Redistricting Decision

National Journal
Scott Bland
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
July 11, 2014, 7:45 a.m.

Re­dis­trict­ing al­ways seems to rear its head mid-dec­ade, long after most states have put their maps away. Texas has re­drawn its ini­tial con­gres­sion­al maps at least once every dec­ade since the 1970s — of­ten un­der court or­der. With yes­ter­day’s ju­di­cial rul­ing that two dis­tricts in Flor­ida were un­con­sti­tu­tion­al, that state has joined the party this dec­ade.

— A cir­cuit court judge in Flor­ida said Thursday that FL-05 and FL-10 were drawn with par­tis­an in­tent and will have to be remapped. FL-05 is Rep. Cor­rine Brown‘s (D) me­an­der­ing, ma­jor­ity-black dis­trict stretch­ing from Jack­son­ville to Or­lando, while FL-10 is Rep. Dan Web­ster‘s (R) neigh­bor­ing seat, a R+6 dis­trict where Web­ster nev­er­the­less had a dif­fi­cult race in 2012.

— Don’t ex­pect any­thing to change this year; with ap­peals in the works and Flor­ida’s primar­ies loom­ing, 2016 is a more likely — and po­ten­tially more in­ter­est­ing — time to ex­pect changes to the map, should the de­cision sur­vive ap­peal. Con­sider, es­pe­cially, that Re­pub­lic­ans might not have uni­fied con­trol of a le­gis­lat­ive remap­ping pro­cess, should Charlie Crist (D) win the gov­ernor’s race.

— Web­ster’s 2016 race could get very in­ter­est­ing in that scen­ario. Any changes to the bound­ar­ies of his dis­trict would seem likely to bring in more of Cent­ral Flor­ida’s boom­ing Pu­erto Ric­an pop­u­la­tion, which has helped make the re­gion more Demo­crat­ic re­cently — but is largely miss­ing from Web­ster’s care­fully drawn dis­trict. Web­ster ran be­hind Mitt Rom­ney in 2012, and Demo­crats would love to have former sher­iff and 2012 can­did­ate Val De­m­ings (D) take an­oth­er shot at some point.

As Flor­ida sorts out its maps and leg­al chal­lenges, Texas con­tin­ues to move for­ward with its own court saga this month. The middle years of this dec­ade have plenty to of­fer re­dis­trict­ing junkies.
— Scott Bland

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×