Feds Sue Amazon Over Kids’ Spending

The online giant plans to fight the charges in court.

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brendan Sasso
July 10, 2014, 8:45 a.m.

Amazon should have done more to pre­vent kids from rack­ing up huge bills on mo­bile apps, ac­cord­ing to a fed­er­al law­suit filed Thursday.

The Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion is seek­ing mil­lions of dol­lars in re­funds for par­ents whose chil­dren made un­au­thor­ized pur­chases for in-app items in Amazon’s store.

For ex­ample, the app “Ice Age Vil­lage” al­lows users to buy ad­di­tion­al “coins” and “acorns” us­ing real money, the FTC said. The largest pos­sible in-game pur­chase would be $99.99, ac­cord­ing to the agency.

Some par­ents re­ceived bills for hun­dreds of dol­lars for their chil­dren’s spend­ing sprees, the FTC said.

Amazon keeps 30 per­cent of all in-app pur­chases, ac­cord­ing to the com­plaint. The store of­fers apps for the Kindle Fire and oth­er devices that use the An­droid op­er­at­ing sys­tem. 

“Amazon’s in-app sys­tem al­lowed chil­dren to in­cur un­lim­ited charges on their par­ents’ ac­counts without per­mis­sion,” FTC Chair­wo­man Edith Ramirez said in a state­ment. “Even Amazon’s own em­ploy­ees re­cog­nized the ser­i­ous prob­lem its pro­cess cre­ated.”

The case is sim­il­ar to one the FTC brought against Apple earli­er this year. But Apple quickly agreed to a $32.5 mil­lion set­tle­ment and prom­ised to change its prac­tices to en­sure that chil­dren have their par­ents’ per­mis­sion for pur­chases. Amazon is ex­pec­ted to fight the case in court.

The com­pany sent a let­ter to the FTC last week, claim­ing that it has al­ways re­fun­ded pur­chases that cus­tom­ers didn’t want. An­drew DeVore, an Amazon as­so­ci­ate gen­er­al coun­sel, said that even at launch, the store in­cluded “prom­in­ent no­tice of in-app pur­chas­ing, ef­fect­ive par­ent­al con­trols and real-time no­tice of every in-app pur­chase.”

But Jes­sica Rich, the dir­ect­or of the FTC’s Bur­eau of Com­pet­i­tion, told re­port­ers on a con­fer­ence call that Amazon im­posed “obstacles” that pre­ven­ted many con­sumers from get­ting re­funds.

Ac­cord­ing to the com­plaint, Amazon didn’t even re­quire pass­words when it first in­tro­duced in-app pur­chases in Novem­ber 2011. The court doc­u­ment high­lights an in­tern­al com­mu­nic­a­tion in which an Amazon em­ploy­ee said the policy was “clearly caus­ing prob­lems for a large per­cent­age of our cus­tom­ers” and the prob­lem was “near house on fire.”

In March 2012, Amazon up­dated its sys­tem to re­quire pass­words for charges over $20, the FTC found. In 2013, Amazon re­quired a pass­word for more situ­ations, but only in June 2014 did the com­pany be­gin re­quir­ing pass­words for all in-app pur­chases, ac­cord­ing to the court doc­u­ment.

Amazon is the second com­pany to face a ma­jor FTC law­suit this month, fol­low­ing T-Mo­bile, which al­legedly placed bogus charges on con­sumers’ bills. 

Rich said both cases show the FTC is com­mit­ted to crack­ing down on com­pan­ies that fail to ob­tain “in­formed con­sent” be­fore billing cus­tom­ers. 

The FTC voted 4-1 to file the law­suit, with Re­pub­lic­an Com­mis­sion­er Joshua Wright dis­sent­ing. 

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
6 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login