Patent Reform Shows Signs of Life in Congress

Once thought dead and buried for 2014, patent reform is suddenly gaining traction in the House. But the clock is ticking.

A sign reading 'patent' has been put on a basket full of tomatoes during a protes staged by Greenpeace activists against food patents in front of the patent office in Munich, southern Germany, on July 20, 2010.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
July 10, 2014, 8:19 a.m.

Con­gress has de­veloped a small ap­pet­ite for pat­ent re­form again, just months after a ma­jor bill thought to be on its way to the pres­id­ent’s desk crashed and burned in the Sen­ate.

Des­pite a late rally of op­pos­i­tion from Demo­crats, the House En­ergy and Com­merce’s Trade Sub­com­mit­tee on Thursday passed 13-6 mostly along party lines a nar­row meas­ure that aims to cut down on “pat­ent trolling,” the prac­tice of com­pan­ies buy­ing up tons of cheap pat­ents and us­ing them to leach cash from in­vent­ors by threat­en­ing in­fringe­ment suits.

The TROL Act, au­thored by Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Lee Terry, would re­quire that de­mand let­ters, which com­pan­ies send to ac­cuse oth­ers of pat­ent in­fringe­ment, be more trans­par­ent and pre­cise in their lan­guage. It also co­di­fies au­thor­ity giv­en to the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion and state at­tor­neys gen­er­al to po­lice the de­liv­ery of ab­us­ive let­ters.

The meas­ure now moves on to the full En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee, where it has con­sid­er­able sup­port from Chair­man Fred Up­ton. But with so few days left in the elec­tion-year le­gis­lat­ive cal­en­dar be­fore Con­gress breaks for the Au­gust re­cess, re­form ad­voc­ates are un­sure how far the bill can real­ist­ic­ally go. Many, too, are still sting­ing from a crum­bling de­feat this spring in the Sen­ate.

“If they can iron out some of these fi­nal things like mak­ing the FTC more com­fort­able “¦ then I think it has a reas­on­able, but not over­whelm­ing, shot,” said one pat­ent lob­by­ist fa­mil­i­ar with the ne­go­ti­ations. “But time is not this or any bill’s friend.”

Tim­ing aside, the TROL Act is not without its de­tract­ors. While earn­ing praise from some pat­ent stake­hold­ers, oth­ers, such as the Main Street Pat­ent Co­ali­tion and CCIA, re­main skep­tic­al. The bill has en­countered res­ist­ance from the FTC and some Demo­crats, who ar­gue that it does not go far enough to pro­tect small com­pan­ies and in­di­vidu­al in­vent­ors.

Demo­crats also charged Terry with not al­low­ing im­port­ant play­ers, in­clud­ing the FTC, enough time or say in the de­vel­op­ment of the bill. Terry has force­fully pushed back against this claim.

“The minor­ity staff con­tinu­ally raised con­cerns that rel­ev­ant stake­hold­ers did not have ac­cess to those drafts and were not part of the con­ver­sa­tion,” said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, dur­ing de­bate Thursday.

Rep. Peter Welch, a Ver­mont Demo­crat, soun­ded con­cern that the nar­row TROL Act would ac­tu­ally pre­vent more sub­stan­tial pat­ent-re­form le­gis­la­tion from get­ting through Con­gress. Welch men­tioned the In­nov­a­tion Act, a sweep­ing re­form pack­age that passed the House late last year be­fore the Sen­ate gave up on months of in­tense ne­go­ti­ations. Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, who was un­der pres­sure from tri­al law­yers and oth­er con­stitu­en­cies, was widely blamed for the sud­den col­lapse.

The TROL Act would provide “an ex­cuse for the Sen­ate not to act on the com­pre­hens­ive bill,” Welch said.

Earli­er this week, Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Patrick Leahy, who led the ef­fort for pat­ent re­form in his cham­ber, told the Bur­l­ing­ton Free Press that he was “furi­ous with what happened” but ad­ded, “I’m not go­ing to give up.”

But echo­ing Re­pub­lic­an cri­ti­cisms, Leahy blamed Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id and oth­ers for not al­low­ing the bill to come to the floor. Re­id’s of­fice, mean­while, con­tin­ues to be mute on the is­sue.

COR­REC­TION: A pre­vi­ous ver­sion of this art­icle stated that the sub­com­mit­tee vote was along party lines. Demo­crats Jim Math­eson and John Bar­row voted for the TROL Act.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.