Sen. Coburn Left Wondering: Why Doesn’t HHS Check Guardians’ Immigration Status?

The Oklahoma Republican got in a heated exchange with a Health and Human Services official about unaccompanied minors at the border.

Sen. Tom Coburn isn't pleased with the government's ability to protect its most sensitive data.
National Journal
Rachel Roubein
July 9, 2014, noon

The tens of thou­sands of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors who are caught at the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der re­ceive med­ic­al care and tem­por­ary shel­ter. The Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment then finds them a more per­man­ent place to live in limbo. But there’s something that goes un­checked: The im­mig­ra­tion status of their newly ap­poin­ted guard­i­an.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., blas­ted HHS on Wed­nes­day for that policy, say­ing it “markedly di­min­ishes” the like­li­hood that un­ac­com­pan­ied minors will show up at their sched­uled im­mig­ra­tion hear­ing.

Chil­dren from Cent­ral Amer­ica’s North­ern Tri­angle are flee­ing their home coun­tries as they at­tempt to es­cape vi­ol­ence and eco­nom­ic dis­par­it­ies plaguing the re­gion. And when they’re caught at the bor­der, HHS is tasked with se­cur­ing a place for them to stay while they await an im­mig­ra­tion hear­ing.

About 95 per­cent of the time, the child is taken out of the HHS’s shel­ter and placed with a par­ent, re­l­at­ive, or non­re­l­at­ive spon­sor. These guard­i­ans are told they’re re­quired to bring the child to all court pro­ceed­ings, said Mark Green­berg, act­ing as­sist­ant sec­ret­ary for HHS’s Ad­min­is­tra­tion for Chil­dren and Fam­il­ies.

But com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Coburn wanted to know wheth­er HHS checks the im­mig­ra­tion status of those spon­sors first. And it’s a ques­tion he asked re­peatedly at a Wed­nes­day hear­ing of the Home­land Se­cur­ity and Gov­ern­ment­al Af­fairs Com­mit­tee. Coburn, who sup­ports de­port­ing chil­dren quickly, grew frus­trated dur­ing the ex­change, and his ques­tions be­came more poin­ted and his voice more heated.{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5068) }}

Coburn: You’re miss­ing my point. My point is, I’m all for hav­ing the chil­dren in the best place, don’t get me wrong. But if you’re not check­ing im­mig­ra­tion status of those that you place with them, and if, in fact, they are not here leg­ally, the like­li­hood that they’re go­ing to show up be­fore a judge is markedly di­min­ished be­cause it ex­poses them. So the ques­tion I would ask you is, why you all don’t ask for status of the people that you place these chil­dren with?

Green­berg: So, the spe­cif­ic as­pects of what hap­pens in the pro­ceed­ings are best ad­dressed by my col­league at the De­part­ment of Justice.

Coburn: I know. I un­der­stand that. I’m ask­ing you the ques­tion, why you don’t ask the status of the people with whom you’re pla­cing the child? Why do you not ask that ques­tion? Be­cause in all like­li­hood, they are not go­ing to show for an im­mig­ra­tion hear­ing.

Green­berg: So, for us the fo­cus needs to be on a safe and ap­pro­pri­ate place­ment for the child.

Coburn: You’re not go­ing to an­swer my ques­tion. Why you do not ask that ques­tion of those people with whom you’re pla­cing these chil­dren?

Green­berg: So, even if we have the in­form­a­tion as to the par­ent or oth­er re­l­at­ive’s im­mig­ra­tion status we would still, at that point, need to look at the to­tal­ity of the cir­cum­stances.

Coburn: I don’t dis­agree with that. I’m ask­ing why do you not ask that ques­tion?

Green­berg: Sir, the reas­on —

Coburn: Is it the policy of HHS not to ask the status of the per­son with whom you’re pla­cing the child?

Green­berg: We do not spe­cific­ally —

Coburn: Is that the policy of HHS of this coun­try?

Green­berg: Yes, it is. That is the case. Yes.

Nearly 18 per­cent of total mi­grants fail to at­tend their court pro­ceed­ing, but the Justice De­part­ment doesn’t have the per­cent­age of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors who are no-shows, Juan Os­una, DOJ Ex­ec­ut­ive Of­fice of Im­mig­ra­tion Re­view dir­ect­or, said at the Wed­nes­day hear­ing.

Cur­rently, law­makers are in the midst of de­term­in­ing how to ad­dress the in­flux of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors en­ter­ing the coun­try il­leg­ally, and Con­gress has some lee­way to ana­lyze the situ­ation and make de­mands. Pres­id­ent Obama needs both cham­bers to ap­prove emer­gency fund­ing to ad­dress the hu­man­it­ari­an crisis — and how to best to stop chil­dren from liv­ing in the shad­ows.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×