Chemical Security Bill Passes House; Democrats Eye Changes in Senate

An April 2013 explosion at the West Fertilizer Company in Texas destroyed this playground across the street, along with many homes. Lawmakers cited the disaster in floor debate on chemical-security legislation that the House ultimately passed.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
Add to Briefcase
Douglas P. Guarino
July 9, 2014, 10:47 a.m.

The House passed a bill that would ex­tend the life of a con­tro­ver­sial chem­ic­al se­cur­ity pro­gram on Tues­day, but some Demo­crats are hop­ing a Sen­ate ver­sion ex­pec­ted later this month will en­able tough­er rules.

The House bill, H.R. 4007, would au­thor­ize the Chem­ic­al Fa­cil­ity Anti-Ter­ror­ism Stand­ards of the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment for three years. The pro­gram, which is meant to pre­vent ter­ror­ists from us­ing in­dus­tri­al sites in the United States for cre­at­ing massive ex­plo­sions, has pre­vi­ously been re­newed an­nu­ally through the con­gres­sion­al ap­pro­pri­ations pro­cess.

Pro­ponents of the bill — in­clud­ing DHS of­fi­cials, in­dustry lead­ers and law­makers on both sides of the aisle — say the le­gis­la­tion is needed in or­der to provide the pro­gram with sta­bil­ity that they say will make it more ef­fect­ive and provide com­pan­ies with reg­u­lat­ory cer­tainty.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive Ben­nie Thompson (D-Miss.) said on the House floor Tues­day that the bill, which the lower cham­ber ul­ti­mately ap­proved by voice vote, was a “good start.” There is “more work to be done,” however, Thompson said.

Be­fore fi­nal le­gis­la­tion reaches the pres­id­ent’s desk, law­makers should add pro­vi­sions to pro­tect whis­tleblowers rais­ing chem­ic­al-se­cur­ity con­cerns, along with lan­guage that would man­date con­sult­ing with work­ers dur­ing the de­vel­op­ment of site-pro­tec­tion plans, Thompson said.

Law­makers also must ad­dress the fact that the cur­rent bill does not in­clude so-called in­her­ently safer tech­no­logy pro­vi­sions that would give DHS of­fi­cials the au­thor­ity to re­quire spe­cif­ic safety and se­cur­ity up­grades in cer­tain cases, said Thompson, the top Demo­crat on the House Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee.

In­dustry op­poses such pro­vi­sions, but they are favored by labor uni­ons and en­vir­on­ment­al­ists.

Thompson also ex­pressed dis­ap­point­ment that an ex­emp­tion for wa­ter treat­ment fa­cil­it­ies would con­tin­ue un­der the cur­rent bill, but said the le­gis­la­tion’s re­quire­ment that the de­part­ment con­duct an as­sess­ment of the chem­ic­al se­cur­ity risks that such fa­cil­it­ies pose was a step in the right dir­ec­tion.

Along with oth­er Demo­crats, Thompson said he would try work with sen­at­ors to make changes to the bill.

Rep­res­ent­at­ive Patrick Mee­han (R-Penn.), said he ex­pec­ted that the Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity could mark up a com­pan­ion bill this month. Mee­han is chair­man of the House Home­land Se­cur­ity Sub­com­mit­tee on Cy­ber­se­cur­ity, In­fra­struc­ture Pro­tec­tion and Se­cur­ity Tech­no­lo­gies that ini­tially ap­proved the House bill.

What We're Following See More »
ON THE CALL: “AT LEAST THAT WAS SACRED”
Gen. Kelly Rips Rep. Wilson for Criticism
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
GOP FORMER PRES V. GOP CURRENT PRES
Bush Slams Trump, Implicitly
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
MEETING WITH SENATE GOP
Trump to Hill Next Tuesday
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS
INTERPARTY FEUDING CONTINUES UNDER PEREZ
Longtime Progressive Members Pushed Out at DNC
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A shake-up is underway at the Democratic National Committee as several key longtime officials have lost their posts, exposing a still-raw rift in the party and igniting anger among those in its progressive wing who see retaliation for their opposition to DNC Chairman Tom Perez. The ousters come ahead of the DNC's first meeting, in Las Vegas, Nevada, since Perez took over as chairman with a pledge this year to unite a party that had become badly divided during the brutal Bernie Sanders-Hillary Clinton 2016 primary race."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login