The House passed a bill that would extend the life of a controversial chemical security program on Tuesday, but some Democrats are hoping a Senate version expected later this month will enable tougher rules.
The House bill, H.R. 4007, would authorize the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards of the Homeland Security Department for three years. The program, which is meant to prevent terrorists from using industrial sites in the United States for creating massive explosions, has previously been renewed annually through the congressional appropriations process.
Proponents of the bill — including DHS officials, industry leaders and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle — say the legislation is needed in order to provide the program with stability that they say will make it more effective and provide companies with regulatory certainty.
Representative Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said on the House floor Tuesday that the bill, which the lower chamber ultimately approved by voice vote, was a “good start.” There is “more work to be done,” however, Thompson said.
Before final legislation reaches the president’s desk, lawmakers should add provisions to protect whistleblowers raising chemical-security concerns, along with language that would mandate consulting with workers during the development of site-protection plans, Thompson said.
Lawmakers also must address the fact that the current bill does not include so-called inherently safer technology provisions that would give DHS officials the authority to require specific safety and security upgrades in certain cases, said Thompson, the top Democrat on the House Homeland Security Committee.
Industry opposes such provisions, but they are favored by labor unions and environmentalists.
Thompson also expressed disappointment that an exemption for water treatment facilities would continue under the current bill, but said the legislation’s requirement that the department conduct an assessment of the chemical security risks that such facilities pose was a step in the right direction.
Along with other Democrats, Thompson said he would try work with senators to make changes to the bill.
Representative Patrick Meehan (R-Penn.), said he expected that the Senate Homeland Security could mark up a companion bill this month. Meehan is chairman of the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection and Security Technologies that initially approved the House bill.
What We're Following See More »
"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.
"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.
"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."