Greenwald: Muslim-Americans Are Not the Only Targets of NSA Spying

In an online discussion, the journalist promises that more leaks about who is targeted by the NSA’s surveillance programs are on the way.

National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
July 9, 2014, 6:47 a.m.

Journ­al­ist Glenn Gre­en­wald has made an­oth­er pledge: He’s not done ex­pos­ing the U.S. gov­ern­ment’s spy­ing secrets.

Dur­ing an “Ask Me Any­thing” ses­sion on red­dit, Gre­en­wald and fel­low journ­al­ist Mur­taza Hus­sain said that Wed­nes­day’s story re­veal­ing that the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency and FBI have tar­geted prom­in­ent Muslim-Amer­ic­ans is not the end of their re­port­ing on Ed­ward Snowden’s year-old leaks.

“I get in trouble every time I talk about our re­port­ing be­fore it’s ready, but suf­fice to say: Muslims, while the prime tar­get of post-9/11 ab­uses, are not the only ones tar­geted by them, and there is def­in­itely more big re­port­ing to come from the Snowden archive,” the pair said in re­sponse to a ques­tion.

Gre­en­wald was sup­plied with a large trove of top-secret doc­u­ments from Ed­ward Snowden last year, and they have fueled a near-con­stant stream of re­ports that have ex­posed in­tim­ate de­tails about the NSA’s clas­si­fied do­mest­ic and for­eign sur­veil­lance pro­grams. On Wed­nes­day, Gre­en­wald’s new­est story re­vealed that in­tel­li­gence agen­cies have spied on the email com­mu­nic­a­tions of five high-pro­file Muslim-Amer­ic­ans who say they are not guilty of any wrong­do­ing.

The story has already pro­voked an out­cry from NSA crit­ics who see the new leak as evid­ence of ra­cial and eth­nic pro­fil­ing by in­tel­li­gence ana­lysts.

In re­sponse, the the Of­fice of the Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence and the Justice De­part­ment said in a joint state­ment that U.S. spy agen­cies do not “con­duct elec­tron­ic sur­veil­lance of polit­ic­al, re­li­gious, or act­iv­ist fig­ures solely be­cause they dis­agree with pub­lic policies or cri­ti­cize the gov­ern­ment, or for ex­er­cising con­sti­tu­tion­al rights.”

What We're Following See More »
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

FUNERAL FOR ISRAELI LEADER
Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many New Voters Does the Clinton Campaign Aim to Register?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."

Source:
“STANDING FOR PRINCIPLES”
Chicago Tribune Endorses Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.

Source:
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×