San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro‘s (D) confirmation today will make him the latest in an unusually long line of elected officials President Obama has tapped for his Cabinet. We don’t know what will happen to Castro, but Obama’s maneuverings have already had a huge impact on national and state politics throughout the country.
— The single biggest one? Not only did Obama’s appointment of then-Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) as Secretary of State do much to set up the 2016 presidential race, it also indirectly launched Kirsten Gillibrand (D) — the formerly anti-immigration, gun-toting, Blue-Dog-rep-turned-liberal-Senate-darling — as a potential Democratic star when she was appointed in Clinton’s place by Gov. David Paterson (D).
— But there are plenty more: George W. Bush only sparingly used current elected officeholders, like then-Orange County mayor Mel Martinez (R), to staff his Cabinet, but Obama’s appointments opened up two governorships and two Senate seats within weeks of him taking office. Janet Napolitano‘s (D) nomination to DHS paved the way for Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer‘s (R) rise, the passage of the SB 1070 immigration law, and this year’s open gubernatorial contest. Where would DSCC chair Sen. Michael Bennet (D), the former Denver schools chief, be right now if Ken Salazar (D) hadn’t moved to Interior?
— Now, the question is: How will Castro’s move to DC affect Texas politics? Even more than for former Charlotte Mayor Anthony Foxx (D), now heading the Transportation Department, there wasn’t an immediate next step for Castro to take at home, while the national experience (not to mention time for Hispanic political power to grow) could help later, as it did with Martinez — or he could skip running statewide in Texas entirely.
But nothing is guaranteed, and it’s always risky for ambitious politicians to remove themselves from the day-to-day details of electoral politics. In any case, as we’ve seen with Obama’s other Cabinet appointments, Castro’s (and Foxx’s) moves are sure to have major effects down the road — some planned, and some unforeseen.
— Scott Bland
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."