Kentucky Senator on Global Warming: ‘There Are No Coal Mines on Mars’

National Journal
Clare Foran
See more stories about...
Clare Foran
July 8, 2014, 11:27 a.m.

Cli­mate deni­al is alive and well in Ken­tucky — but it has taken an odd new twist.

Re­pub­lic­an state Sen. Brandon Smith had this to say about glob­al warm­ing last Thursday dur­ing a hear­ing con­vened by the Ken­tucky In­ter­im Joint Com­mit­tee on Nat­ur­al Re­sources and En­vir­on­ment:

“I don’t want to get in­to the de­bate about cli­mate change. But I will just simply point out that I think that in aca­demia we all agree that the tem­per­at­ure on Mars is ex­actly as it is here. Nobody will dis­pute that. Yet there are no coal mines on Mars, there’s no factor­ies on Mars that I’m aware of. So I think what we’re look­ing at is something much great­er than what we’re go­ing to do.”

Smith’s state­ment con­tains the stand­ard ar­gu­ment ad­vanced by cli­mate den­iers: The idea that hu­man activ­ity, like the burn­ing of fossil fuels, has not caused glob­al warm­ing. That runs counter to the sci­entif­ic con­sensus: Peer-re­viewed lit­er­at­ure sur­veys in­dic­ate that 97 per­cent of cli­mate sci­ent­ists agree that the plan­et is heat­ing up and that hu­man activ­ity is the primary driver of that change.

But the Re­pub­lic­an law­maker ex­plores a fresh take with his in­ter­stel­lar com­par­is­on. There are in­deed no coal mines on Mars, but most everything else in Smith’s state­ment is fac­tu­ally bank­rupt.

Smith claims that Earth is ex­actly the same tem­per­at­ure as Mars. Ac­cord­ing to NASA, the Earth’s av­er­age tem­per­at­ure is 57 de­grees Fahren­heit. By con­trast, Mars has an av­er­age tem­per­at­ure of neg­at­ive 81 de­grees Fahren­heit.

Smith was elec­ted to four terms in the Ken­tucky House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives, and is cur­rently serving his second-term in the state Sen­ate. And ac­cord­ing to Ken­tucky NPR af­fil­i­ate WKMS, he is also the own­er of a coal com­pany.

Watch what Smith has to say here:

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5067) }}

What We're Following See More »
AND VICE VERSA
Plurality of Trump Voters Just Want to Stop Clinton
4 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.

Source:
IF HE’LL JUST LISTEN…
Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
21 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
INCLUDING CLINTON
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Source:
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
×