Hobby Lobby and the Rush Limbaugh Effect

We’ve forgotten Sandra Fluke’s message even as she’s become a household name.

Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke. 
National Journal
Lucia Graves
July 8, 2014, 1 a.m.

It’s one of the quirks of the con­ver­sa­tion around con­tra­cep­tion that hardly any­one re­calls what Sandra Fluke was ac­tu­ally say­ing in the testi­mony that cata­pul­ted her to na­tion­al at­ten­tion. What people re­mem­ber is that, at some point in the course of the 2012 elec­tions, Rush Limbaugh called her a slut.

And just like that, an in­tel­li­gent con­ver­sa­tion about the med­ic­al needs of mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans turned in­to an as­in­ine In­ter­net firestorm over wheth­er the Geor­getown Uni­versity law stu­dent could right­fully be called a sex­ist slur. Fluke ap­peared on NBC to say she was “stunned” and “out­raged.” Rush penned a rare mea culpa. And Pres­id­ent Obama reached out to her per­son­ally, to em­path­ize. The cov­er­age was such that The Week felt the need to run a large graph­ic en­titled “Rush Limbaugh vs. Sandra Fluke: A Timeline.”

The out­rage was mer­ited, but it was not a re­place­ment for a policy dis­cus­sion about the point that Fluke was ac­tu­ally mak­ing in her testi­mony: that there are sun­dry med­ic­al reas­ons wo­men need ac­cess to birth con­trol as a mat­ter of routine health, in­clud­ing cyst and can­cer pre­ven­tion. It also, as MS­N­BCs Ben­jy Sarlin re­cently mused, has been al­most en­tirely for­got­ten.

{{third­PartyEmbed type:you­tube id:xlRC0n­s­jtKQ}}

So let’s set the re­cord straight. Fluke’s testi­mony re­volved around wo­men for whom ac­cess to con­tra­cept­ives is a med­ic­al im­per­at­ive, not simply a way to pre­vent preg­nancy. In par­tic­u­lar, she fo­cused on a les­bi­an friend of hers at Geor­getown who needed the pill to reg­u­late a com­mon med­ic­al con­di­tion. “In the worst cases wo­men who need this med­ic­a­tion for oth­er med­ic­al reas­ons suf­fer very dire med­ic­al con­sequences,” Fluke said at the time. “A friend of mine, for ex­ample, has poly­cyst­ic ovari­an syn­drome and she has to take pre­scrip­tion birth con­trol to stop cysts from form­ing on her ovar­ies.”

While she made a nu­anced ar­gu­ment for the med­ic­al be­ne­fits of birth con­trol, all we re­mem­ber is later she got labeled a slut. Call it the Rush Limbaugh ef­fect and chalk it up to mis­takes made 2012. The trouble is, it’s still hap­pen­ing, and the rul­ing in the Hobby Lobby case last week is a per­fect ex­ample of how.

The Su­preme Court’s ma­jor­ity opin­ion, which found that closely held cor­por­a­tions may for re­li­gious reas­ons deny their em­ploy­ees cer­tain forms of con­tra­cept­ive cov­er­age, made zero men­tions of wo­men who rely on the pill for med­ic­al reas­ons. It’s not be­cause it wasn’t in any of the leg­al lit­er­at­ure presen­ted to the Court be­fore the de­cision.

“Poly­cyst­ic ovari­an syn­drome” just doesn’t have the same ring to it as “slut.”

An at­tor­ney who cowrote a brief to the Su­preme Court on be­half of ovari­an-can­cer ad­voc­ates said the justices (to say noth­ing of the gen­er­al pub­lic) have failed to con­sider the broad­er nar­rat­ive. “The de­bate was mis-framed as a con­tra­cept­ive de­bate from the be­gin­ning,” Michelle Kisloff, a part­ner at Hogan Lov­ells, told me. “We’ve tried to re­cast that de­bate to ori­ent the Court to the fact that there’s more go­ing on here than preg­nancy and con­tra­cep­tion, but ul­ti­mately the Court went with the way Hobby Lobby had char­ac­ter­ized it.”

That’s not however, be­cause Fluke’s friend is alone in her health prob­lems. PCOS is a com­mon con­di­tion. In fact, as I noted in my piece Thursday, PCOS is the single most fre­quent en­do­crine prob­lem in wo­men of re­pro­duct­ive age, af­fect­ing 5 to 10 per­cent of the fe­male pop­u­la­tion. And hor­mone reg­u­la­tion, via or­al con­tra­cept­ives, is the best known treat­ment.

That the highly for­get­table name makes the con­di­tion sound more ob­scure than it ac­tu­ally is is such a big prob­lem that ex­perts have long re­com­men­ded re­nam­ing the con­di­tion, which af­fects ap­prox­im­ately 5 mil­lion wo­men of re­pro­duct­ive age in the United States. It’s one of a hand­ful of med­ic­al con­di­tions — in­clud­ing en­do­met­ri­os­is, en­do­metri­al can­cer, and ovari­an can­cer — that were ig­nored in last week’s Hobby Lobby de­cision. Not that you’d know it from the tran­script of or­al ar­gu­ments or the cov­er­age of the de­cision that fol­lowed.

The way the Court and the me­dia have been talk­ing about it has more in com­mon with the Limbaugh per­spect­ive. “Sex, sex, sex. That’s what it’s all about,” Limbaugh said over the week­end. “Every­body wants it and whatever it takes to make it safe. And if it takes the tax­pay­er buy­ing wo­men birth con­trol than men are for it too.” In an­oth­er, he claimed wo­men wouldn’t need birth con­trol if they simply “didn’t do a cer­tain thing.”

If Amer­ic­ans have for­got­ten Fluke’s mes­sage, they haven’t for­got­ten Fluke. Though her star has faded con­sid­er­ably since the days of Limbaugh la­beling her with idi­ot­ic epi­thets, she’s back in the news this elec­tion cycle — this time as a can­did­ate.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×