Hobby Lobby and the Rush Limbaugh Effect

We’ve forgotten Sandra Fluke’s message even as she’s become a household name.

Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke. 
National Journal
Lucia Graves
July 8, 2014, 1 a.m.

It’s one of the quirks of the con­ver­sa­tion around con­tra­cep­tion that hardly any­one re­calls what Sandra Fluke was ac­tu­ally say­ing in the testi­mony that cata­pul­ted her to na­tion­al at­ten­tion. What people re­mem­ber is that, at some point in the course of the 2012 elec­tions, Rush Limbaugh called her a slut.

And just like that, an in­tel­li­gent con­ver­sa­tion about the med­ic­al needs of mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans turned in­to an as­in­ine In­ter­net firestorm over wheth­er the Geor­getown Uni­versity law stu­dent could right­fully be called a sex­ist slur. Fluke ap­peared on NBC to say she was “stunned” and “out­raged.” Rush penned a rare mea culpa. And Pres­id­ent Obama reached out to her per­son­ally, to em­path­ize. The cov­er­age was such that The Week felt the need to run a large graph­ic en­titled “Rush Limbaugh vs. Sandra Fluke: A Timeline.”

The out­rage was mer­ited, but it was not a re­place­ment for a policy dis­cus­sion about the point that Fluke was ac­tu­ally mak­ing in her testi­mony: that there are sun­dry med­ic­al reas­ons wo­men need ac­cess to birth con­trol as a mat­ter of routine health, in­clud­ing cyst and can­cer pre­ven­tion. It also, as MS­N­BCs Ben­jy Sarlin re­cently mused, has been al­most en­tirely for­got­ten.

{{third­PartyEmbed type:you­tube id:xlRC0n­s­jtKQ}}

So let’s set the re­cord straight. Fluke’s testi­mony re­volved around wo­men for whom ac­cess to con­tra­cept­ives is a med­ic­al im­per­at­ive, not simply a way to pre­vent preg­nancy. In par­tic­u­lar, she fo­cused on a les­bi­an friend of hers at Geor­getown who needed the pill to reg­u­late a com­mon med­ic­al con­di­tion. “In the worst cases wo­men who need this med­ic­a­tion for oth­er med­ic­al reas­ons suf­fer very dire med­ic­al con­sequences,” Fluke said at the time. “A friend of mine, for ex­ample, has poly­cyst­ic ovari­an syn­drome and she has to take pre­scrip­tion birth con­trol to stop cysts from form­ing on her ovar­ies.”

While she made a nu­anced ar­gu­ment for the med­ic­al be­ne­fits of birth con­trol, all we re­mem­ber is later she got labeled a slut. Call it the Rush Limbaugh ef­fect and chalk it up to mis­takes made 2012. The trouble is, it’s still hap­pen­ing, and the rul­ing in the Hobby Lobby case last week is a per­fect ex­ample of how.

The Su­preme Court’s ma­jor­ity opin­ion, which found that closely held cor­por­a­tions may for re­li­gious reas­ons deny their em­ploy­ees cer­tain forms of con­tra­cept­ive cov­er­age, made zero men­tions of wo­men who rely on the pill for med­ic­al reas­ons. It’s not be­cause it wasn’t in any of the leg­al lit­er­at­ure presen­ted to the Court be­fore the de­cision.

“Poly­cyst­ic ovari­an syn­drome” just doesn’t have the same ring to it as “slut.”

An at­tor­ney who cowrote a brief to the Su­preme Court on be­half of ovari­an-can­cer ad­voc­ates said the justices (to say noth­ing of the gen­er­al pub­lic) have failed to con­sider the broad­er nar­rat­ive. “The de­bate was mis-framed as a con­tra­cept­ive de­bate from the be­gin­ning,” Michelle Kisloff, a part­ner at Hogan Lov­ells, told me. “We’ve tried to re­cast that de­bate to ori­ent the Court to the fact that there’s more go­ing on here than preg­nancy and con­tra­cep­tion, but ul­ti­mately the Court went with the way Hobby Lobby had char­ac­ter­ized it.”

That’s not however, be­cause Fluke’s friend is alone in her health prob­lems. PCOS is a com­mon con­di­tion. In fact, as I noted in my piece Thursday, PCOS is the single most fre­quent en­do­crine prob­lem in wo­men of re­pro­duct­ive age, af­fect­ing 5 to 10 per­cent of the fe­male pop­u­la­tion. And hor­mone reg­u­la­tion, via or­al con­tra­cept­ives, is the best known treat­ment.

That the highly for­get­table name makes the con­di­tion sound more ob­scure than it ac­tu­ally is is such a big prob­lem that ex­perts have long re­com­men­ded re­nam­ing the con­di­tion, which af­fects ap­prox­im­ately 5 mil­lion wo­men of re­pro­duct­ive age in the United States. It’s one of a hand­ful of med­ic­al con­di­tions — in­clud­ing en­do­met­ri­os­is, en­do­metri­al can­cer, and ovari­an can­cer — that were ig­nored in last week’s Hobby Lobby de­cision. Not that you’d know it from the tran­script of or­al ar­gu­ments or the cov­er­age of the de­cision that fol­lowed.

The way the Court and the me­dia have been talk­ing about it has more in com­mon with the Limbaugh per­spect­ive. “Sex, sex, sex. That’s what it’s all about,” Limbaugh said over the week­end. “Every­body wants it and whatever it takes to make it safe. And if it takes the tax­pay­er buy­ing wo­men birth con­trol than men are for it too.” In an­oth­er, he claimed wo­men wouldn’t need birth con­trol if they simply “didn’t do a cer­tain thing.”

If Amer­ic­ans have for­got­ten Fluke’s mes­sage, they haven’t for­got­ten Fluke. Though her star has faded con­sid­er­ably since the days of Limbaugh la­beling her with idi­ot­ic epi­thets, she’s back in the news this elec­tion cycle — this time as a can­did­ate.

What We're Following See More »
THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
57 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
9 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
LATER TO THIS YEAR’S NADER
Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

Source:
×