Having so far failed to complete reform legislation intended to ensure veterans don’t die waiting for health care, lawmakers return facing significant unfinished business to show voters action before they go home to campaign in August.
The House and Senate are under the gun to show a response to reports that veterans have been left languishing for months on secret waiting lists for medical treatment, or never even getting onto such lists. Veterans are a popular constituency that neither party can afford to ignore, so the pressure is on to deliver something lawmakers can campaign on, before election season heats up.
But members serving on a joint House and Senate conference committee, tasked with hashing out veterans reform legislation, made little headway before recess.
The 28 committee members agreed they are committed to a bipartisan solution that will make it easier for veterans to receive the care they deserve. But several — particularly Republicans — remain hung up over concerns about estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that the reforms could cost as much as $50 billion a year.
The legislation would make it easier to remove incompetent Veterans Affairs Department leaders. It also aims to ensure veterans receive more timely care, including by letting veterans who live more than 40 miles from a VA health center seek care from private providers.
But lawmakers largely do not want to be seen doubling the government’s cost of VA health care to achieve this goal.
Before recess, at the only public meeting of the conference committee, Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., who serves as the ranking member on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, blasted the CBO numbers, calling the agency’s assumptions “ludicrous” and challenging it to back them up.
Since then members and staff have met behind closed doors with CBO officials, asking for a justification of its assumptions. CBO has argued that because the legislation aims to improve access to VA health care and minimize wait times, veterans are likely to increase the amount of care they receive from the VA. And veterans who do not currently rely on the VA are also more likely to enroll in it and seek out this benefit.
Currently about 8 million of roughly 21 million veterans are enrolled in VA health care; of those, about 6. 5 million take advantage of it. CBO estimated that another 8 million eligible veterans might seek access to VA health care because of the improvements to its access that would be made through the legislation.
But some conference committee members are balking, challenging these predictions. They are asking CBO and the VA to come up with new estimates of what the legislation would cost if additional restrictions or limitations were placed on the expanded access to health care in a final bill.
“The first order of business is for VA and CBO to produce information regarding certain costs and considerations associated with possible reform permutations,” said a congressional aide familiar with the negotiations.
No additional formal meetings of the full roster of conferees have been set, but individual members and staff continue to discuss ways to whittle down the projected costs of the reform.
Lawmakers say they are committed to hashing out a compromise bill and getting it through both chambers and to the president’s desk as quickly as possible. But sources tracking the negotiations argue the cost wrinkles could take a while to iron out, making the August recess the next big deadline for completion.
“What needs to happen is the conferees need to agree upon the size and scope and cost “¦ as well as some of the other initiatives in the bill,” said Robert Norton, a deputy director of government relations with the Military Officers Association of America. “Our biggest concern is that they need to get it done. They need to make sure that veterans get access and are not stuck on these waiting lists for months on end.”
What We're Following See More »
In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.
"In this election, and every election, it's about who will have the power to shape our children for the next four or eight years of their lives," Michelle Obama said. "There is only one person who I trust with that responsibility … and that is our friend Hillary Clinton." In a personal and emotional speech, Michelle Obama spoke about the effect that angry oppositional rhetoric had on her children and how she chose to raise them. "When they go low, we go high," Obama said she told her children about dealing with bullies. Obama stayed mostly positive, but still offered a firm rebuke of Donald Trump, despite never once uttering his name. "The issues a president faces cannot be boiled down to 140 characters," she said.
Many Bernie Sanders delegates have spent much of the first day of the Democratic National Convention resisting unity, booing at mentions of Hillary Clinton and often chanting "Bernie! Bernie!" Well, one of the most outspoken Bernie Sanders supporters just told them to take a seat. "To the Bernie-or-bust people: You're being ridiculous," said comedian Sarah Silverman in a brief appearance at the Convention, minutes after saying that she would proudly support Hillary Clinton for president.
The Democratic National Committee issued a formal apology to Bernie Sanders today, after leaked emails showed staffers trying to sabotage his presidential bid. "On behalf of everyone at the DNC, we want to offer a deep and sincere apology to Senator Sanders, his supporters, and the entire Democratic Party for the inexcusable remarks made over email," DNC officials said in the statement. "These comments do not reflect the values of the DNC or our steadfast commitment to neutrality during the nominating process. The DNC does not—and will not—tolerate disrespectful language exhibited toward our candidates."
The chairman of the DCCC said Debbie Wasserman Schultz won't be getting financial help from the organization this year, even as she faces a well-funded primary challenger. "Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) said the committee’s resources will be spent helping Democrats in tough races rather than those in seats that are strongholds for the party." Executive Director Kelly Ward added, “We never spend money in safe seats."