While initial U.S. assessments suggest that Iraq’s security forces are able to defend Baghdad, what about taking back parts of the country that have been lost to insurgents?
Well, the Pentagon believes Iraq will likely need some help with that.
“I think that’s a really broad, campaign-quality question. Probably not by themselves,” said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when asked about the ability of Iraqi security forces to retake territory captured by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
The United States has roughly 650 troops in Iraq. It has also sent planes and ships into the region since the crisis began. ISIS, for its part, declared its territory in Iraq and Syria to be an Islamic state, but Dempsey said he believes their forces are currently stretched thin as they try to maintain their gains.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Thursday during the joint briefing that U.S. troops currently in Iraqaren’t involved in combat missions — and won’t be involved in combat missions. But Dempsey seemed to leave the door open, saying that “we may get to that point” when U.S. troops have direct military involvement in Iraq.
“That is one option, but one I personally don’t think [is what] the situation demands,” he added, stressing that the current U.S. strategy isn’t the same as in 2003 and 2006 — when the U.S. invaded Iraq and in the lead-up to the surge of U.S. troops, respectively.
In the meantime, the United States is still trying to get a full picture of what is going on in Iraq. Imagine trying to solve a Rubik’s Cube without being able to see all of the sides.
Leading that effort is the Pentagon, which has six assessment teams in Iraq. It also has two joint operations centers there — one in Baghdad and a second in Erbil, a large city in northern Iraq.
And although the Pentagon’s top duo are getting early assessments, Hagel said, we “won’t have the full complement of all those assessments for a while.
What We're Following See More »
Newt Gringrich is actively positioning himself as a possible VP nominee for Donald Trump, according to National Review. After a New York Times piece mentioned him as a possible running mate, he said, "It is an honor to be mentioned. We need a new Contract with America to outline a 100-day plan to take back Washington from the lobbyists, bureaucrats, unions, and leftists. After helping in 1980 with Reagan and 1995 as speaker I know we have to move boldly and decisively before the election results wear off and the establishment starts fighting us. That is my focus." Meanwhile, Trump told CNN he'd be "interested in vetting" John Kasich as well.
"House Democrats are stepping up pressure on Republicans to advance legislation addressing Puerto Rico’s worsening debt crisis by issuing a report arguing that austerity cuts can’t be sustained and have made the island more vulnerable to the mosquito-borne Zika virus." Democrats on the House Natural Resources Committee released a report yesterday that argued "further sharp reductions in government spending can’t be a part of a legislative solution"—especially with a rainy season boosting the mosquito population and stressing an island health system already struggling to deal with the Zika virus.
"ISIS has the capability to stage a Paris-style attack in the U.S. using local cells to strike in multiple locations and inflict dozens of casualties, according to the Obama administration's top U.S. intelligence official." Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told CNN's Peter Bergen that such a scenario is "something we worry about a lot in the United States, that they could conjure up a raid like they did in Paris or Brussels."
"Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he expected to reveal his vice presidential pick sometime in July—before the Republican National Convention in Cleveland—but added that he would soon announce a committee to handle the selection process, which would include Dr. Ben Carson." He said he's inclined to name a traditional political figure, unlike himself.