While initial U.S. assessments suggest that Iraq’s security forces are able to defend Baghdad, what about taking back parts of the country that have been lost to insurgents?
Well, the Pentagon believes Iraq will likely need some help with that.
“I think that’s a really broad, campaign-quality question. Probably not by themselves,” said Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when asked about the ability of Iraqi security forces to retake territory captured by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
The United States has roughly 650 troops in Iraq. It has also sent planes and ships into the region since the crisis began. ISIS, for its part, declared its territory in Iraq and Syria to be an Islamic state, but Dempsey said he believes their forces are currently stretched thin as they try to maintain their gains.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Thursday during the joint briefing that U.S. troops currently in Iraqaren’t involved in combat missions — and won’t be involved in combat missions. But Dempsey seemed to leave the door open, saying that “we may get to that point” when U.S. troops have direct military involvement in Iraq.
“That is one option, but one I personally don’t think [is what] the situation demands,” he added, stressing that the current U.S. strategy isn’t the same as in 2003 and 2006 — when the U.S. invaded Iraq and in the lead-up to the surge of U.S. troops, respectively.
In the meantime, the United States is still trying to get a full picture of what is going on in Iraq. Imagine trying to solve a Rubik’s Cube without being able to see all of the sides.
Leading that effort is the Pentagon, which has six assessment teams in Iraq. It also has two joint operations centers there — one in Baghdad and a second in Erbil, a large city in northern Iraq.
And although the Pentagon’s top duo are getting early assessments, Hagel said, we “won’t have the full complement of all those assessments for a while.
What We're Following See More »
"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."
Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."