Biotech Breakthroughs May Put Chemical Arms in Easier Reach

A damaged microscope seen in a Gaza Strip laboratory caught in crossfire between Palestinian fighters in 2007. An international panel said it is still impossible to fully determine how future technologies may make chemical-warfare materials easier to produce and harder to regulate.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
Add to Briefcase
Diane Barnes
July 3, 2014, 7:28 a.m.

An in­ter­na­tion­al team wants to closely watch how fu­ture tech­no­lo­gies could make the world’s dead­li­est pois­ons easi­er to pro­duce and harder to reg­u­late.

It is still im­possible to know how an ar­ray of emer­ging tech­no­lo­gies — such as cus­tom-built pro­teins and mi­cro­scop­ic con­tain­ers — will af­fect cap­ab­il­it­ies to man­u­fac­ture and de­liv­er leth­al chem­ic­als banned un­der in­ter­na­tion­al law, sci­entif­ic ad­visers to the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons said in a new as­sess­ment.

In­ter­na­tion­al au­thor­it­ies should con­tin­ue mon­it­or­ing the po­ten­tial of bi­o­tech­no­logy to af­fect en­force­ment of the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion, even though de­vel­op­ments rel­ev­ant to the pro­duc­tion of banned chem­ic­al agents “are cur­rently lim­ited,” says the fi­nal re­port by a work­ing group of the OP­CW Sci­entif­ic Ad­vis­ory Board.

Des­pite the field’s present lim­it­a­tions, “bio­medi­ated pro­cesses might still be ef­fect­ive for pro­du­cing weapon­iz­able quant­it­ies of tox­ins that are leth­al,” the re­port warns. “New pro­duc­tion pro­cesses, com­bined with de­vel­op­ments in drug dis­cov­ery and de­liv­ery, could be ex­ploited in the de­vel­op­ment of new tox­ic chem­ic­als that could be used as weapons.”

The pan­el ad­ded that the agency’s man­date hems in its en­force­ment au­thor­ity, po­ten­tially com­plic­at­ing any glob­al ef­fort to over­see bio­lo­gic­al in­nov­a­tions that fall in a gray area of in­ter­na­tion­al law.

The Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion may not re­quire mem­ber na­tions to re­port “many fa­cil­it­ies tak­ing ad­vant­age of bio­lo­gic­ally me­di­ated pro­duc­tion pro­cesses,” the ad­vis­ory pan­el said in its re­port. The group ad­ded that the treaty ex­empts nu­mer­ous activ­it­ies that “may be sci­en­tific­ally jus­ti­fied” for peace­ful pur­poses, such as pro­du­cing bio­fuel or al­co­hol­ic drinks.

The re­port also calls for routine con­sulta­tions with of­fi­cials re­spons­ible for over­see­ing a sep­ar­ate in­ter­na­tion­al ban on bio­lo­gic­al arms. OP­CW Dir­ect­or Gen­er­al Ah­met Üzüm­cü three years ago dir­ec­ted his agency’s sci­entif­ic ad­visers to con­sider how the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s en­force­ment tasks may be af­fected by the on­go­ing “con­ver­gence” of chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al sci­ences.

The pan­el ad­vised Üzüm­cü to dis­cuss con­ver­gence is­sues with over­seers of the Bio­lo­gic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion.

What We're Following See More »
Spicer Excludes NYT, CNN, BuzzFeed from Press Gaggle
6 hours ago
NRA Chief: Leftist Protesters Are Paid
7 hours ago
Trump: Agencies Should Recommend Regulations to Repeal
8 hours ago
Trump Still on Campaign Rhetoric
10 hours ago
Trump Rails On Obamacare
10 hours ago

After spending a few minutes re-litigating the Democratic primary, Donald Trump turned his focus to Obamacare. “I inherited a mess, believe me. We also inherited a failed healthcare law that threatens our medical system with absolute and total catastrophe” he said. “I’ve been watching and nobody says it, but Obamacare doesn’t work.” He finished, "so we're going to repeal and replace Obamacare."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.