Biotech Breakthroughs May Put Chemical Arms in Easier Reach

A damaged microscope seen in a Gaza Strip laboratory caught in crossfire between Palestinian fighters in 2007. An international panel said it is still impossible to fully determine how future technologies may make chemical-warfare materials easier to produce and harder to regulate.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
July 3, 2014, 7:28 a.m.

An in­ter­na­tion­al team wants to closely watch how fu­ture tech­no­lo­gies could make the world’s dead­li­est pois­ons easi­er to pro­duce and harder to reg­u­late.

It is still im­possible to know how an ar­ray of emer­ging tech­no­lo­gies — such as cus­tom-built pro­teins and mi­cro­scop­ic con­tain­ers — will af­fect cap­ab­il­it­ies to man­u­fac­ture and de­liv­er leth­al chem­ic­als banned un­der in­ter­na­tion­al law, sci­entif­ic ad­visers to the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons said in a new as­sess­ment.

In­ter­na­tion­al au­thor­it­ies should con­tin­ue mon­it­or­ing the po­ten­tial of bi­o­tech­no­logy to af­fect en­force­ment of the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion, even though de­vel­op­ments rel­ev­ant to the pro­duc­tion of banned chem­ic­al agents “are cur­rently lim­ited,” says the fi­nal re­port by a work­ing group of the OP­CW Sci­entif­ic Ad­vis­ory Board.

Des­pite the field’s present lim­it­a­tions, “bio­medi­ated pro­cesses might still be ef­fect­ive for pro­du­cing weapon­iz­able quant­it­ies of tox­ins that are leth­al,” the re­port warns. “New pro­duc­tion pro­cesses, com­bined with de­vel­op­ments in drug dis­cov­ery and de­liv­ery, could be ex­ploited in the de­vel­op­ment of new tox­ic chem­ic­als that could be used as weapons.”

The pan­el ad­ded that the agency’s man­date hems in its en­force­ment au­thor­ity, po­ten­tially com­plic­at­ing any glob­al ef­fort to over­see bio­lo­gic­al in­nov­a­tions that fall in a gray area of in­ter­na­tion­al law.

The Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion may not re­quire mem­ber na­tions to re­port “many fa­cil­it­ies tak­ing ad­vant­age of bio­lo­gic­ally me­di­ated pro­duc­tion pro­cesses,” the ad­vis­ory pan­el said in its re­port. The group ad­ded that the treaty ex­empts nu­mer­ous activ­it­ies that “may be sci­en­tific­ally jus­ti­fied” for peace­ful pur­poses, such as pro­du­cing bio­fuel or al­co­hol­ic drinks.

The re­port also calls for routine con­sulta­tions with of­fi­cials re­spons­ible for over­see­ing a sep­ar­ate in­ter­na­tion­al ban on bio­lo­gic­al arms. OP­CW Dir­ect­or Gen­er­al Ah­met Üzüm­cü three years ago dir­ec­ted his agency’s sci­entif­ic ad­visers to con­sider how the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s en­force­ment tasks may be af­fected by the on­go­ing “con­ver­gence” of chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al sci­ences.

The pan­el ad­vised Üzüm­cü to dis­cuss con­ver­gence is­sues with over­seers of the Bio­lo­gic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×