The League of Conservation Voters, which is in the midst of a multimillion-dollar campaign to elect climate-friendly candidates, has hired the Center for American Progress’s Daniel J. Weiss to oversee its climate and elections program.
Weiss, a three-decade veteran of the green scene, will oversee what the group is pledging will be a far-reaching and deep-pocketed campaign. LCV and its affiliates spent $14 million last cycle and expect to top that this time around.
“Dan has the skills, creativity, and experience to help us support environmental champions and take on climate-change deniers,” said LCV president Gene Karpinski. “We’re excited to have him join our team at a time of unprecedented growth and success for our organization.”
Weiss most recently served as a senior fellow at CAP and the director of the group’s clean-energy and climate program. He also served as political director for the Sierra Club for eight years, where he oversaw its then-record $9 million Environmental Voter Education Campaign in 2000.
His hiring comes as big money is flowing from environmental interests ahead of the 2014 midterms. LCV’s Give Green campaign has already raised $3 million — a record for the campaign — for candidates in high-profile races like the Iowa and New Hampshire Senate campaigns. And billionaire Tom Steyer’s NextGen Climate aims to inject $100 million to defeat Republican candidates in seven Senate and gubernatorial races.
Weiss, who started at LCV Wednesday, said he looked forward to complementing NextGen and others’ “efforts to also elect pro-climate action candidates and defeat the climate science deniers.”
With Weiss departing, CAP has beefed up its energy and climate team this spring by hiring Greg Dotson as vice president of energy policy. Dotson spent over 18 years as an aide to Rep. Henry Waxman, the top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee and former chairman of that panel and the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
What We're Following See More »
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.