This Is How Rand Paul Is Trying to Win Over the Right on Foreign Policy

The Kentucky Republican’s policies toward Israel may not have changed much. But his rhetoric has.

Sen. Rand Paul speaks at the Berkeley Forum on the UC Berkeley campus on March 19, 2014 in Berkeley, California. 
National Journal
Emma Roller
See more stories about...
Emma Roller
July 2, 2014, 4:51 a.m.

Sen. Rand Paul has a new an op-ed in the Na­tion­al Re­view call­ing for in­creased U.S. sup­port for Is­rael, and giv­ing grist to the idea that he is an in­ev­it­able 2016 can­did­ate.

If he is in­deed plan­ning to run for pres­id­ent in 2016, the column gives us a good pre­view of the rhet­or­ic he’ll use to try to win over con­ser­vat­ives.

Paul’s Na­tion­al Re­view piece is centered on the three Is­raeli teen­agers who were found dead on Monday after dis­ap­pear­ing on June 12. The Is­raeli gov­ern­ment has held the ter­ror­ist group Hamas ac­count­able for the kid­nap­pings and murders, but Hamas has denied re­spons­ib­il­ity.

In his column, the sen­at­or known for hav­ing an isol­a­tion­ist streak strengthened his rhet­or­ic on Is­rael:

I think it is clear by now: Is­rael has shown re­mark­able re­straint. It pos­sesses a mil­it­ary with clear su­peri­or­ity over that of its Palestini­an neigh­bors, yet it does not re­spond to threat after threat, pro­voca­tion after pro­voca­tion, with the type of force that would de­cis­ively end their con­flict.

As Lu­cia Graves at Na­tion­al Journ­al pres­ci­ently wrote in May, Paul has vis­ibly “evolved” on Is­rael — or at least his rhet­or­ic has — since he be­came a sen­at­or. In 2011, shortly after be­ing sworn in, Paul called for the U.S. to cut off aid to Is­rael en­tirely.

“I think they’re an im­port­ant ally, but I also think that their per cap­ita in­come is great­er than prob­ably three-fourths of the rest of the world,” Paul told ABC then. “Should we be giv­ing free money or wel­fare to a wealthy na­tion? I don’t think so.”

That’s Paul’s conun­drum: At heart, he’s a de­fi­cit hawk. But to win over con­ser­vat­ive voters he must mas­quer­ade as a de­fense hawk.

Paul’s change in tone may be ideo­lo­gic­al, but it’s also prag­mat­ic. In March, Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial hope­fuls — not in­clud­ing Paul — met with the casino own­er and GOP megadonor Shel­don Ad­el­son in Las Ve­gas. The week­end was in­form­ally called the “Ad­el­son primary,” and at­trac­ted rumored can­did­ates such as Chris Christie, Scott Walk­er, and John Kasich.

Ad­el­son, 80, is the eighth-richest per­son in the world, and is staunchly pro-Is­rael. In the two days after the Las Ve­gas meet­ing, he per­son­ally made $2.1 bil­lion — 21 times more than the amount he donated in the 2012 elec­tion. An aide to Paul told The At­lantic he’d been in­vited to the Shel­don primary, but had to de­cline be­cause of per­son­al com­mit­ments.

Since that fate­ful week­end, Paul has been beef­ing up his Is­rael bona fides. In May, he in­tro­duced the Stand With Is­rael Act, which would cut off U.S. aid to the Palestini­an Au­thor­ity un­til it form­ally re­cog­nizes the state of Is­rael. The bill hasn’t moved in the Sen­ate yet, and Paul is try­ing to give it an­oth­er boost with his new op-ed. Even the Amer­ic­an Is­rael Pub­lic Af­fairs Com­mit­tee, the top pro-Is­rael lob­by­ing shop in the coun­try, has said it won’t sup­port Paul’s bill.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5058) }}

Paul’s latest pro­pos­als are not so dif­fer­ent from those of the non­in­ter­ven­tion­ist Paul we’ve seen in years past. He’s not re­quest­ing the U.S. air­drop troops onto the West Bank, or even any ad­di­tion­al U.S. in­volve­ment. The dif­fer­ence is that now, he’s wrap­ping his pro­pos­als in more hawk­ish lan­guage, ba­sic­ally call­ing on Is­rael to take Hamas out.

“Some say my po­s­i­tion is too hard-line, too strong,” Paul wrote on Tues­day. But it’s hard to ima­gine which hy­po­thet­ic­al people have ac­cused Paul of tak­ing too hard a line on Is­rael … yet.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×