Government Privacy Board Endorses NSA’s Internet Spying

The surveillance is legal and effective, according to the panel.

A computer workstation bears the National Security Agency (NSA) logo inside the Threat Operations Center inside the Washington suburb of Fort Meade, Maryland, intelligence gathering operation 25 January 2006 after US President George W. Bush delivered a speech behind closed doors and met with employees in advance of Senate hearings on the much-criticized domestic surveillance. 
National Journal
Brendan Sasso
Add to Briefcase
Brendan Sasso
July 2, 2014, 4 a.m.

The Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s In­ter­net sur­veil­lance pro­grams are leg­al and ef­fect­ive, ac­cord­ing to the Pri­vacy and Civil Liber­ties Over­sight Board, an in­de­pend­ent watch­dog agency.

In a draft re­port, the pan­el ex­presses con­cern with cer­tain ele­ments of the NSA’s massive col­lec­tion of In­ter­net data with­in the United States, and out­lines sev­er­al re­forms it says would bol­ster pri­vacy pro­tec­tions and im­prove trans­par­ency.

But the re­port, set for form­al re­lease Wed­nes­day, is sure to dis­ap­point pri­vacy ad­voc­ates, who had hoped the board would make a broad call for re­form in its re­view of spy­ing un­der Sec­tion 702 of the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Act.

The pro­vi­sion gives in­tel­li­gence agen­cies the au­thor­ity to spy on the com­mu­nic­a­tions of for­eign­ers loc­ated out­side the United States. The NSA has used the power for its “PRISM” pro­gram, in which it is­sues de­mands to com­pan­ies such as Face­book, Google, and Mi­crosoft for their users’ com­mu­nic­a­tions. The NSA has also been us­ing the au­thor­ity to tap in­to the In­ter­net back­bone to suck up in­ter­na­tion­al com­mu­nic­a­tions.

The Pri­vacy and Civil Liber­ties Over­sight Board, a bi­par­tis­an five-mem­ber group that was formed to pro­mote pri­vacy after the Sept. 11 at­tacks, said cer­tain as­pects of the sur­veil­lance push the pro­grams “close to the line of con­sti­tu­tion­al reas­on­able­ness.” For ex­ample, the NSA not only spies on the com­mu­nic­a­tions to and from cer­tain tar­gets, but also scans through vast amounts of In­ter­net data look­ing for any com­mu­nic­a­tions about the tar­gets. The gov­ern­ment also “in­cid­ent­ally” col­lects a large amount of in­form­a­tion from Amer­ic­ans, and some­times searches through its data­bases spe­cific­ally look­ing for Amer­ic­an data.

The House ap­proved le­gis­la­tion last month that would re­quire the gov­ern­ment to ob­tain a war­rant for such searches of Amer­ic­ans’ com­mu­nic­a­tions. But the board’s re­port doesn’t en­dorse le­gis­la­tion to close so-called back­door do­mest­ic searches. The pan­el notes that the pro­gram only in­ten­tion­ally col­lects com­mu­nic­a­tions of for­eign­ers, who aren’t covered by the Fourth Amend­ment.

The re­port re­com­mends that the NSA tight­en its tar­get­ing pro­ced­ures and provide more jus­ti­fic­a­tion to the For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court when it searches for Amer­ic­ans’ in­form­a­tion. The FBI should face tough­er lim­its on its abil­ity to use the in­form­a­tion for crim­in­al in­vest­ig­a­tions, and the gov­ern­ment should make more in­form­a­tion about its spy­ing pub­lic, the board said.

None of the re­com­mend­a­tions re­quire le­gis­lat­ive ac­tion. 

Two of the board mem­bers, Chair­man Dav­id Med­ine and Pa­tri­cia Wald, is­sued a sep­ar­ate state­ment say­ing the re­com­mend­a­tions don’t go “nearly far enough to pro­tect U.S. per­sons’ pri­vacy rights.” The mem­bers said they would have called for more ju­di­cial over­sight of the searches of U.S. in­form­a­tion.

Pri­vacy groups say the re­port falls far short of ad­dress­ing the pro­grams’ ser­i­ous pri­vacy vi­ol­a­tions of Amer­ic­ans and for­eign­ers.

“The PCLOB’s pro­posed re­forms for Sec­tion 702 are an an­em­ic set of re­com­mend­a­tions that will do little to stop ex­cess­ive sur­veil­lance,” Cindy Cohn, the leg­al dir­ect­or of the Elec­tron­ic Fron­ti­er Found­a­tion, wrote in a blog post. “The gov­ern­ment’s col­lec­tion and search of Amer­ic­ans’ com­mu­nic­a­tions without a war­rant or in­di­vidu­ally ap­proved court or­der is barred by the Con­sti­tu­tion and must be stopped.”

The re­port’s mod­est re­com­mend­a­tions con­trast with the sweep­ing call for re­form in the board’s re­view of spy­ing un­der Sec­tion 215 of the USA Pat­ri­ot Act earli­er this year. The NSA uses that pro­vi­sion, which has re­ceived more at­ten­tion in the wake of Ed­ward Snowden’s leaks, to col­lect re­cords such as phone num­bers and call times on mil­lions of U.S. phone calls.

Al­though Sec­tion 702 is aimed more at spy­ing on for­eign­ers, it al­lows the NSA to read the ac­tu­al con­tents of emails and oth­er com­mu­nic­a­tions.

Dustin Volz con­trib­uted to this art­icle

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
1 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
2 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login