Judge Rejects Kentucky’s Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage With So Much Sass

The governor’s arguments in favor of the ban are “at best illogical and even bewildering,” the federal judge writes.

A supporter of same-sex marriage holds American and gay pride flags in San Francisco
National Journal
Sarah Mimms
July 1, 2014, 9:47 a.m.

A fed­er­al judge ruled Tues­day that Ken­tucky’s ban on same-sex mar­riage vi­ol­ates gay and les­bi­an couples’ equal-pro­tec­tion rights un­der the Four­teenth Amend­ment. U.S. Dis­trict Court Judge John G. Hey­burn II im­me­di­ately is­sued a stay — mean­ing that wed­ding bells in the Bluegrass State won’t be ringing while the state pur­sues an ap­peal — but he did take the op­por­tun­ity to snark about what he termed the state’s “be­wil­der­ing” at­tempts to up­hold the ban.

Demo­crat­ic Gov. Steve Be­s­hear and his at­tor­neys ar­gued — as oth­ers have in sim­il­ar cases across the coun­try — that giv­en the Su­preme Court’s re­fus­al to take up a gay-mar­riage case in 1972 and the fact that same-sex couples can­not pro­cre­ate “nat­ur­ally,” that Ken­tucky should be al­lowed to keep its ban on gay mar­riage. As in many oth­er cases across the coun­try, the court re­jec­ted those ar­gu­ments.

But this is where Be­s­hear and his law­yers get cre­at­ive or, as Hey­burn put it, “disin­genu­ous.” Mar­riage between het­ero­sexu­al couples, they ar­gued, con­trib­utes “to a stable birth rate which, in turn, en­sures the state’s long-term eco­nom­ic sta­bil­ity.”

Hey­burn, to put it mildly, didn’t buy­ing that ar­gu­ment:

Even as­sum­ing the state has a le­git­im­ate in­terest in pro­mot­ing pro­cre­ation, the Court fails to see, and De­fend­ant nev­er ex­plains, how the ex­clu­sion of same-sex couples from mar­riage has any ef­fect what­so­ever on pro­cre­ation among het­ero­sexu­al spouses. Ex­clud­ing same-sex couples from mar­riage does not change the num­ber of het­ero­sexu­al couples who choose to get mar­ried, the num­ber who choose to have chil­dren, or the num­ber of chil­dren they have.

… The state’s at­tempts to con­nect the ex­clu­sion of same-sex couples from mar­riage to its in­terest in eco­nom­ic sta­bil­ity and in “en­sur­ing hu­man­ity’s con­tin­ued ex­ist­ence” are at best il­lo­gic­al and even be­wil­der­ing.

Hey­burn went on to ar­gue that un­der that lo­gic, Ken­tucky could leg­ally deny mar­riage li­censes to couples who could not pro­cre­ate, or chose not to.

Cit­ing pri­or case law, Hey­burn con­cluded: “This Court bases its rul­ing primar­ily upon the ut­ter lack of lo­gic­al re­la­tion between the ex­clu­sion of same-sex couples from mar­riages and any con­ceiv­able le­git­im­ate state in­terest. Any re­la­tion­ship between Ken­tucky’s ban on same-sex mar­riage and its in­terest in pro­cre­ation and long-term eco­nom­ic sta­bil­ity ‘is so at­ten­u­ated as to render the dis­tinc­tion ar­bit­rary or ir­ra­tion­al.’”

Hey­burn wrote an earli­er opin­ion in Feb­ru­ary, alert­ing Ken­tucky that it would have to im­me­di­ately re­cog­nize same-sex mar­riages that were per­formed out-of-state. That rul­ing is be­ing ap­pealed as well. The Sixth Dis­trict Court of Ap­peals will hear or­al ar­gu­ments in the Ken­tucky case and cases in oth­er states be­gin­ning Aug. 6.

For more on the cur­rent state of the battle for same-sex mar­riage, check out our map of laws, court cases and le­gis­lat­ive fights across the coun­try.

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
23 hours ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
18 hours ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
5 hours ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.