Hispanic Wealth Could Triple by 2025

Population growth will drive the trend, according to a report from the St. Louis Fed. The average Hispanic family likely still won’t see many gains.

National Journal
Sophie Quinton
Add to Briefcase
Sophie Quinton
July 1, 2014, 1 a.m.

The total net worth of His­pan­ic house­holds might reach $4.4 tril­lion by 2025, ac­cord­ing to a new re­port from the Fed­er­al Re­serve Bank of St. Louis. But the re­port pre­dicts that much of that growth will be driv­en by the grow­ing num­ber of His­pan­ic house­holds — not by the grow­ing wealth of the av­er­age fam­ily.

His­pan­ic men and wo­men made up about 16 per­cent of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion in 2010, and held $1.4 tril­lion dol­lars of over­all wealth. That’s just 2.2 per­cent of the na­tion’s in­come, prop­erty, and fin­an­cial as­sets, ac­cord­ing to the re­port. By 2050, the His­pan­ic pop­u­la­tion will al­most double, but the share of wealth His­pan­ics hold will likely re­main dis­pro­por­tion­ately small.

The re­ces­sion widened the wealth gap between white and His­pan­ic fam­il­ies. His­pan­ic fam­il­ies lost al­most one-third of their net worth between 2007 and 2010. While white fam­il­ies were also hard hit, the av­er­age white fam­ily lost a smal­ler share of its total wealth than the av­er­age minor­ity fam­ily, partly be­cause white fam­il­ies ten­ded to hold more types of as­sets and to have less money tied up in home equity.

The re­port’s au­thors, Wil­li­am Em­mons and Bry­an No­eth, made two pro­jec­tions for house­hold wealth in the fu­ture. In the more op­tim­ist­ic scen­ario, they cal­cu­lated that house­holds would quickly re­bound from the re­ces­sion and re­vert to the long-term growth trends ob­served from 1989 to 2010. In the less op­tim­ist­ic scen­ario, they as­sumed no such re­bound. The au­thors cau­tioned that their pro­jec­tions were, well, pro­jec­tions, and thus un­cer­tain.

“In the more pess­im­ist­ic scen­ario, the His­pan­ic share of total wealth would in­crease only be­cause the His­pan­ic pop­u­la­tion is ex­pec­ted to grow faster,” they wrote. Un­der the more op­tim­ist­ic scen­ario, His­pan­ic wealth would grow to $4.4 tril­lion; un­der the less op­tim­ist­ic pro­jec­tion, it would grow to $2.5 tril­lion.

Yet even un­der the re­port’s more op­tim­ist­ic pro­jec­tion, His­pan­ic house­holds would hold just 3.2 per­cent of the na­tion’s wealth. Wealth ac­cu­mu­la­tion for all house­holds would also widen ra­cial wealth dis­par­it­ies, if past trends con­tin­ue. Un­der the fast growth scen­ario, His­pan­ic fam­il­ies would pos­sess 26.5 per­cent of the av­er­age Amer­ic­an fam­ily’s wealth in 2025, up from 22 per­cent in 2010. In oth­er words, even if everything goes well and the av­er­age His­pan­ic fam­ily gains wealth, by na­tion­al stand­ards they still wouldn’t be well off.

What We're Following See More »
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
18 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
19 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login