Rep. Charles Rangel has declared victory in another close primary race and the Associated Press has called the race in his favor, but state Sen. Adriano Espaillat still has not conceded.
Rangel won with 47 percent of the vote, while Espaillat had 44 percent, pastor Mike Walrond had 8 percent, and Bronx activist Yolanda Garcia had 1 percent when the AP called the race shortly before 4 p.m. today. Rangel’s margin stood at slightly more than 1,800 votes.
“Words cannot describe my overwhelming gratitude to the voters “¦ for standing with me to the very end and giving this veteran his one last fight,” Rangel said in a statement. He said he hoped “to begin the healing process” after the divisive primary and announced that he would attend a “unity rally” with Rev. Al Sharpton, who did not endorse him in the race.
But Espaillat still has not conceded, citing outstanding absentee and provisional ballots. Espaillat insisted that “every single vote needs to be counted in this race,” in a statement late Tuesday night, and spokeswoman Chelsea Connor said Espaillat has not changed his mind since then.
Rangel’s reelection bids have become more difficult since he was censured in 2010 over several ethics issues and especially after redistricting in 2012 transformed his district into a majority-Hispanic constituency.
In 2010, he barely won the majority of votes in a six-candidate primary field. And in 2012, he didn’t even get majority support in a crowded field but still beat Espaillat by slightly more than 1,000 votes.
The rematch was expected to be competitive, although Rangel appeared to be ahead late, leading by 13 points in a mid-June NY1/Siena College poll. He also had an advantage over Espaillat in his reliable base of supporters who have kept him in office for more than four decades. But primary turnout is always unpredictable, especially since New York moved its congressional primaries from September to June in 2012.
The district’s divided demographics led to a divided race. In the NY1/Siena College poll, Rangel led Espaillat among African-American voters 76 percent to 6 percent, and Espaillat led Rangel among Hispanic voters 53 percent to 29 percent. Rangel even accused Espaillat of entering the race only because he thought he could win over the Hispanic population.
“Just what the heck has he actually done besides saying he’s a Dominican?” Rangel said in a debate.
The debate also focused on the length of Rangel’s tenure. Espaillat and another candidate emphasized their relative youth, while Rangel frequently mocked Espaillat for his lack of experience.
Rangel also did not have as much support as he used to, missing out on endorsements from President Obama and Mayor Bill de Blasio, both of whom stayed out of the race. In previous campaigns, Rangel had been endorsed by then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and he once again got Bill Clinton’s support.
Rangel has said this would be his last reelection campaign, meaning another crowded field of Democrats will compete to take over the heavily Democratic seat in two years.
What We're Following See More »
"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."