Pakistani Leader Vows ‘Restraint and Responsibility’ on Border Clashes

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 14, 2013, 8:02 a.m.

On Wed­nes­day, Pakistani Prime Min­is­ter Nawaz Sharif prom­ised “re­straint and re­spons­ib­il­ity” in his re­sponse to the es­cal­at­ing clashes with In­di­an forces in the dis­puted re­gion of Kash­mir, Agence France-Presse re­por­ted.

An “un­pro­voked In­di­an shelling” in­to Pakistani-con­trolled Kash­mir res­ul­ted in the death of one ci­vil­ian and the in­jury of his daugh­ter, Pakistani mil­it­ary of­fi­cials said.

In a joint news con­fer­ence with vis­it­ing U.N. Sec­ret­ary-Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon, Sharif told re­port­ers that “Pakistan will con­tin­ue to re­spond to the situ­ation with re­straint and re­spons­ib­il­ity in the hope that steps will be taken by In­dia to re­duce ten­sions,” ac­cord­ing to AFP.

He went on to say that “we have to de­fuse ten­sion and de-es­cal­ate the situ­ation. Our ob­ject­ive is peace. For that, what we need is more dip­lomacy.”

On Tues­day, In­dia’s For­eign Min­istry spokes­man, Syed Ak­barud­din, hin­ted that the re­newed vi­ol­ence in the dis­puted ter­rit­ory would harm re­la­tions between the two nuc­le­ar-armed South Asi­an coun­tries, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted.

He also re­peated In­dia’s de­mand that Pakistan as­sert con­trol over anti-In­di­an mil­it­ant groups, charge those re­spons­ible for con­cep­tu­al­iz­ing the 2008 Mum­bai at­tacks, and pre­vent ter­rit­ory un­der Pakistani con­trol from be­ing used to launch at­tacks against In­dia, AP re­por­ted.

Both sides have ac­cused the oth­er of vi­ol­at­ing a 2003 cease­fire in re­cent days.

“Our side re­spon­ded to the un­pro­voked fir­ing from the Pakistani side with small arms. In­ter­mit­tent fir­ing went on for the whole night till Monday morn­ing (loc­al time),” In­di­an army spokes­per­son Rajesh Kalia was quoted as say­ing on Tues­day in a sep­ar­ate AFP re­port.

Pakistan’s For­eign Min­istry said it had “summoned the In­di­an deputy high com­mis­sion­er” in or­der to voice con­sterna­tion over an al­leged In­di­an vi­ol­a­tion of the 2003 cease­fire, “which has res­ul­ted in the loss of an in­no­cent ci­vil­ian life in Rawalakot,” ac­cord­ing to the wire ser­vice. 

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
19 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
20 hours ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.