What Can Republicans Learn From Steve Pearce?

How does a white Republican survive in a border district with a majority-Hispanic constituency?

Rep. Steve Pearce
National Journal
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
Aug. 14, 2013, 2:46 p.m.

PORTALES, N.M. ““ Rep. Steve Pearce looks out over the nearly 50 people who have shown up for his town hall at the his­tor­ic Yam Theat­er in this east­ern New Mex­ico city and jokes, “Just raise your hands. It’s like an auc­tion. If nobody raises their hands, we’ll sell and go home.”

But Pearce knows he’s about to be hammered with ques­tions. This un­apo­lo­get­ic con­ser­vat­ive law­maker is be­com­ing a na­tion­al curi­os­ity. He’s the only Re­pub­lic­an con­gress­man who rep­res­ents an area on the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der. He’s also a white non-His­pan­ic law­maker in a geo­graph­ic­ally sprawl­ing dis­trict that is more than half His­pan­ic.

To some, that paints a tar­get on him. State and na­tion­al Demo­crats are try­ing to cast Pearce as an en­dangered polit­ic­al spe­cies be­cause of the chan­ging demo­graph­ics in his dis­trict. They claim his vot­ing re­cord no longer meshes with the ma­jor­ity-His­pan­ic pop­u­la­tion, in a dis­trict also where Demo­crats already have an edge in voter en­roll­ment.

At the same time, Pearce’s con­tin­ued abil­ity to get reelec­ted has some na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans say­ing his brand of con­ser­vat­ism might ac­tu­ally be a guid­ing light for the party, per­haps even a way to at­tract more Latino voters.

Pearce, 65, dis­misses both cal­cu­la­tions.

“The clock is tick­ing. But not that clock. It’s this gray-hair clock that’s tick­ing on me,” he laughs about sug­ges­tions that his days in Con­gress are numbered be­cause of the chan­ging demo­graph­ics. But in the same in­ter­view with Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily, Pearce says he’s already warned his own party lead­ers he will be dif­fi­cult to emu­late or clone, say­ing he’s told them, ‘When I’m gone, you’re go­ing to have a tough time win­ning this dis­trict.’ “

Un­deni­ably, a key as­pect of New Mex­ico’s 2nd Dis­trict is the sheer size of its ter­rit­ory, and that weighs heav­ily in Pearce’s fa­vor. The dis­trict cov­ers more than 70,000 (mostly rur­al) square miles of the south­ern half of New Mex­ico, an area lar­ger than the en­tire state of Flor­ida.

In all, it has 18 counties, stretch­ing north to areas just south of Al­buquerque. It is home to Las Cruces, its biggest city, as well as places such as De­m­ing, Ruid­oso, Hatch, and Roswell, the city well known for its an­nu­al UFO fest­iv­al, and Billy the Kid’s old Lin­coln County stomp­ing grounds. There’s even the town that changed its name to Truth or Con­sequences in the 1950s, in or­der to win a vis­it from the host of a once-pop­u­lar quiz show.

But there is no single huge pop­u­la­tion cen­ter. And or­gan­iz­a­tion­al ef­forts of any kind take some do­ing, which can make it tough for a polit­ic­al chal­lenger to take on someone who has been blaz­ing the dis­trict’s trails for years.

Im­ped­i­ment to Over­come

Pearce is a New Mex­ico nat­ive who was a com­bat pi­lot dur­ing the Vi­et­nam War and who, after mil­it­ary life, star­ted his own busi­ness in the oil-field ser­vices in­dustry. Pearce served as con­gress­man from the area from 2003 to 2009, giv­ing up the seat for an un­suc­cess­ful 2008 bid for the Sen­ate. But when he lost that race by a large mar­gin to Demo­crat Tom Ud­all, Pearce ran to re­claim his House seat in 2010, tak­ing about 42 per­cent of the His­pan­ic vote and out­per­form­ing what Mitt Rom­ney did at the top of the GOP tick­et na­tion­ally. He ous­ted Demo­crat Harry Teague who, it turned out, had suc­ceeded him in Con­gress only tem­por­ar­ily.

To hear Pearce ex­plain it, he simply works harder than most oth­ers would in this mam­moth dis­trict. “Each county — 18 of them — is its own ba­sic demo­graph­ic. So, that’s an im­ped­i­ment. But it’s an im­ped­i­ment I had to over­come. You’ve got to get out there and make the miles and the hours.” For Pearce, those miles are made that much longer be­cause his home is in Hobbs — any­thing but cent­rally loc­ated — on the Texas bor­der far to the east.

Yet, as his busy Au­gust con­gres­sion­al break sched­ule shows, Pearce holds a de­term­ined pace. Just in the past week, he has at­ten­ded the town hall in Portales, the Lea County rodeo, and meet­ings in Santa Rosa. There are also of­fice hours and stops in each loc­ale to meet loc­al of­fi­cials, vet­er­ans, and oth­ers. There are two more town halls next week in De­m­ing and Las Cruces, loc­a­tions that also are hun­dreds of miles away from Hobbs.

Pearce does al­most all of this travel by car with staffers, spend­ing much of that time sleep­ing, work­ing on the com­puter, and writ­ing thank-you notes. “It’s hard to make calls be­cause the cell [ser­vice] is dropped every­where,” he says.

Pearce says he works this way be­cause his dis­trict is, as he says, “up­side down” in fa­vor of Demo­crats. “So I tell people that it’s a little bit like dat­ing a girl on the oth­er side of New York City. You can date her, but you bet­ter be on the sub­way every af­ter­noon, go­ing over there. She’d just as soon find some­body closer.”

“If you’re there, it’s OK. And so Demo­crats will vote for me if I come out and work hard and show up. But if I am in­vis­ible, they’d just as soon vote for a Demo­crat,” he ex­plains. As for His­pan­ic voters, he says they’re not look­ing so much at polit­ic­al party, but like oth­er voters, “they’re look­ing for people who un­der­stand their de­sire for a bet­ter edu­ca­tion for kids, jobs, and safety in the streets.”

Im­mig­ra­tion De­bate

On this day he’s driv­en to Portales for the town hall. There, seni­ors, vet­er­ans, dairy and pea­nut farm­ers, and ranch­ers press Pearce about the stalled farm bill, as well as the Af­ford­able Care Act, a pos­sible gov­ern­ment shut­down, and con­cern over the fu­ture of a nearby Air Force Base.

But it’s a con­tin­gent from the Somos Un Pueblo Unido im­mig­rant group that makes up half of those in at­tend­ance. And so, the ques­tions keep com­ing back to im­mig­ra­tion re­form and why Pearce, in some views, is not more of a na­tion­al lead­er for his party on the is­sue.

Pearce main­tains a mostly likable, even hu­mor­ous tone, in­clud­ing his re­peated in­sist­ence on de­clar­ing that he is more of a policy wonk than politi­cian.

But some of the reas­on­ing for his firm po­s­i­tion against in­clud­ing a path to cit­izen­ship in im­mig­ra­tion re­form is not well re­ceived. “I have been to oth­er coun­tries, just re­cently early this year I was in Africa,” he said. “People liv­ing on one dol­lar a day. Now, my heart goes out to those Afric­an kids. But shouldn’t they be­come cit­izens? Shouldn’t those Afric­an kids with one dol­lar a day be­come cit­izens? Well, maybe they should. But I have to say, prob­ably, we can’t feed the whole world. We can’t feed 8 bil­lion people.”

He adds, “I’m simply say­ing that a path­way to cit­izen­ship makes me very nervous for 11 mil­lion people [already here]. I do not un­der­stand how we tell the oth­er 8 bil­lion ‘no.’ “

Pearce ex­plains that he pro­poses in­stead to strengthen the bor­der, and that un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants who want to be­come U.S. cit­izens must first go back home and get in line. But if any of them want to stay and work, un­der his plan, they can ob­tain a green card without fines or oth­er pen­al­ties, start pay­ing taxes, get pro­tec­tion from gov­ern­ment agen­cies, and not “live in the shad­ows” or fear ex­ploit­a­tion.

The rub is that that green card could nev­er be­come a red card; there would be no path to cit­izen­ship, as the Sen­ate has pro­posed.

As for se­cur­ing the bor­der, Pearce tells his audi­ence that more fen­cing won’t work. Rather, he says strength­en­ing se­cur­ity through more soph­ist­ic­ated tech­no­logy should be the plan.

Pearce gets a bit testy when Mar­ina Piña, 24, of Portales, sug­gests that Pearce re­gards un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants as a bur­den to New Mex­ico and the coun­try. “Don’t put words in my mouth,” Pearce says, in­ter­rupt­ing her in mid-sen­tence.

Piña re­sponds nervously, yet cat­tily, “That’s true con­gress­man Pearce. You haven’t said much. And that’s the prob­lem. “¦ What we need is your real lead­er­ship on this is­sue.” Oth­er His­pan­ics in the audi­ence, in­clud­ing some who’ve worked for years at loc­al farms and for oth­er busi­nesses, also ask Pearce, po­litely, “Why do you not want us to be­come cit­izens?” and “Do you not care about Latino voters?”

At the close of the town hall, listen­ers leave di­vided on what they heard from Pearce.

“In our area, this is ex­actly the mes­sage we are look­ing for,” said Keith Thomas, a self-de­scribed lib­er­al Re­pub­lic­an on the Portales City Coun­cil and the pres­id­ent-elect of the Roosevelt County Cham­ber of Com­merce. “The east side of New Mex­ico typ­ic­ally is a very con­ser­vat­ive group of folks — a lot of re­tir­ees, a lot of ag­ri­cul­ture. And I think we’re just want­ing straight an­swers from people rep­res­ent­ing us, and not act­ing like politi­cians. I think we get straight an­swers from Steve Pearce.”

But Mar­cela Diaz, the Santa Fe-based dir­ect­or of Somos Un Pueblo Unido, who was on hand for the town hall, had a dif­fer­ent spin. “There’s move­ment in a sense that he re­cog­nizes that we need these work­ers here, in his dis­trict, in New Mex­ico,” she said. But she ad­ded, “What we think is you clearly re­cog­nize us, con­gress­man. You clearly want us here. But you want us to be second-class cit­izens. You don’t want us to have the abil­ity to vote, or to have the per­man­ence or the se­cur­ity of cit­izen­ship.”

Talk­ing to Demo­crats

Back in Wash­ing­ton, some GOP lead­ers, in­clud­ing Re­pub­lic­an Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee Chair­man Re­ince Priebus, have poin­ted to Pearce as someone who is help­ing the party tap in­to His­pan­ic voter sup­port. “When a con­ser­vat­ive like Steve Pearce in New Mex­ico wins in a pre­dom­in­antly Latino dis­trict, we need to glean the les­sons of his ap­proach,” Priebus said in March.

But closer scru­tiny of Pearce’s for­mula raises ques­tions about wheth­er many Re­pub­lic­ans could — or would — really want to du­plic­ate his ap­proach. For in­stance, Pearce rarely talks openly about be­ing a Re­pub­lic­an. “Be­cause I rep­res­ent a 34 per­cent Re­pub­lic­an dis­trict, I al­ways must be talk­ing to Demo­crats, so I don’t use ‘Demo­crat’ or ‘Re­pub­lic­an’ too much out in the open,” he said.

He also jokes on the stump about not be­ing able to speak much Span­ish, even though he ac­know­ledges to audi­ences that his moth­er was a Span­ish teach­er. Pearce says that even His­pan­ics tend to laugh at the tale of his de­term­in­a­tion grow­ing up that he wasn’t go­ing to learn any­thing from his par­ents — in­clud­ing Span­ish — and that when they laugh, they also “for­give” him. The laughs keep com­ing, he says, when he throws out that his moth­er keeps ask­ing, “How’s that Eng­lish work­ing for you in that dis­trict, son?”

But watch­ing him at a town hall, it be­comes clear that Pearce ac­tu­ally knows more Span­ish than he lets on.

Pearce is also con­stantly re­mind­ing audi­ences that he was among 12 Re­pub­lic­ans who did not vote in Janu­ary to reelect John Boehner as House speak­er. “Prob­ably the most pop­u­lar vote I’ve made, in this dis­trict,” he says. When he tells audi­ences he cast that vote, Pearce says he gets, “Al­ways ap­plause, some­times stand­ing ap­plause.”

But there is a clear aim to his lead­er­ship bash­ing. Pearce is work­ing to in­ocu­late him­self from any­thing those party lead­ers might do that won’t play well in his dis­trict. In short, he is em­phas­iz­ing that he is not part of Boehner’s in­ner circle, and has little con­trol over what Boehner and Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor, R-Va., and oth­ers might do.

“I don’t know what pushes the lead­er­ship be­cause I’m not in that group,” he told the town hall. “I don’t care to be in that group be­cause I’m think I’m an in­de­pend­ent voice. I’d rather be in­de­pend­ent than be in the lead­er­ship clique.”

In an in­ter­view, Pearce goes on to com­plain that House GOP lead­ers “have some tim­id be­lief that if they pass im­mig­ra­tion re­form they’re sud­denly go­ing to get His­pan­ic votes. And I’m telling them that’s just about as crazy as any­thing I’ve ever heard of.”

The Bor­der Caucus

Still, as Pearce pitches him­self as a savvy in­de­pend­ent voice, state and na­tion­al Demo­crats say demo­graph­ics in his dis­trict can­not be ig­nored forever.

“The clock is tick­ing,” says Rep. Raul Gri­jalva, D-Ar­iz., the co­chair­man of the Con­gres­sion­al Bor­der Caucus, a group of law­makers from dis­tricts along the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der, with whom Pearce does not act­ively par­ti­cip­ate.

Gri­jalva is among those who be­lieve that even if Pearce is able to hold onto his seat in the 2014 con­gres­sion­al elec­tions, he won’t be able to do so for long there­after.

Demo­crats in the dis­trict now hold an en­roll­ment ad­vant­age that could be as high as 43 per­cent, and the latest U.S. Census Bur­eau stat­ist­ics from 2011 show the dis­trict is roughly 52 per­cent His­pan­ic. Though not all His­pan­ic res­id­ents are eli­gible voters, the Pew Re­search Cen­ter last fall re­por­ted that some 39 per­cent of all of New Mex­ico’s eli­gible voters are His­pan­ic, the largest share in any state.

Some Demo­crats say Pearce has be­nefited from weak, un­der­fun­ded op­pon­ents. But this cycle, there is already one Demo­crat can­did­ate de­clared to run against him — Leslie En­dean-Singh, a Demo­crat­ic law­yer from Alamogordo — and state Demo­crats are try­ing to woo oth­er can­did­ates, in­clud­ing Rox­anne Lara, the Carls­bad at­tor­ney and former Eddy County com­mis­sion­er who un­suc­cess­fully sought the state party chair­man­ship earli­er this year.

Whatever spe­cial for­mula the na­tion­al GOP be­lieves Pearce may have, Demo­crats note that it did not work when he left his seat to run for Sen­ate in 2008.

“He’s very likable, very per­son­able — and he does work hard to get out to see con­stitu­ents,” said state Demo­crat­ic Party Chair­man Sam Breg­man. “But if Re­pub­lic­ans think Steve Pearce is a mod­el, then they’re go­ing to be los­ing a lot of elec­tions.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4387) }}

What We're Following See More »
How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
56 minutes ago
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
3 hours ago

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
3 hours ago

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."

Congress Can’t Seem Not to Pay Itself
6 hours ago

Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.

How Far Away from Cleveland is the California GOP Staying?
7 hours ago

Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."