DOE Erred on Nevada Willingness to Accept Waste: Memos

Add to Briefcase
Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 19, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

The U.S. En­ergy De­part­ment wrongly as­sumed it had re­solved all of Nevada’s con­cerns about a pending ship­ment of highly ra­dio­act­ive atom­ic waste, the Las Ve­gas Sun re­por­ted on Sunday, cit­ing a re­view of gov­ern­ment doc­u­ments.

A Dec. 4, 2012, DOE memo re­veals that de­part­ment of­fi­cials were at the time pre­par­ing to ship more than 400 con­tain­ers, filled with urani­um waste, to the Nevada Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Site from the nuc­le­ar weapons site at Oak Ridge, Tenn. En­ergy of­fi­cials ap­par­ently be­lieved they had ad­equately as­suaged all of Nevada’s con­cerns about how the ma­ter­i­al would be stored dur­ing fed­er­al meet­ings with state per­son­nel in late Novem­ber.

Nevada com­monly re­ceives low-level ex­cess nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al, but the urani­um-waste ship­ment is judged to pose a high­er se­cur­ity risk be­cause of its suit­ab­il­ity as fuel for a ra­di­olo­gic­al “dirty bomb.”

Leo Droz­doff, who heads the Nevada Con­ser­va­tion and Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­part­ment, told the Sun that DOE of­fi­cials had only ad­dressed Nevada’s is­sues with how the urani­um con­tain­ers would be stored at the Nevada Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Site, but not how they would be trans­por­ted to the state. Also left un­re­solved, ac­cord­ing to Droz­doff, is wheth­er Nevada’s al­low­ance of the waste with­in its bor­ders would con­sti­tute a pre­ced­ent for re­ceiv­ing po­ten­tial sim­il­ar ship­ments of ex­tremely ra­dio­act­ive used nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al.

Nevada’s cur­rent po­s­i­tion is that it has not agreed to ac­cept the ra­dio­act­ive waste.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.