White House Seeks U.N. Inquiry on Alleged New Syrian Chemical Strike

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 21, 2013, 10:02 a.m.

The White House on Wed­nes­day con­demned the pos­sible new use of chem­ic­al weapons in Syr­ia and called for a U.N. team now in the Middle East na­tion to in­vest­ig­ate with ur­gency.

“The United States is deeply con­cerned by re­ports that hun­dreds of Syr­i­an ci­vil­ians have been killed in an at­tack by Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment forces, in­clud­ing by the use of chem­ic­al weapons, near Dam­as­cus earli­er today,” Josh Earn­est, Pres­id­ent Obama’s prin­cip­al deputy press sec­ret­ary, said in a re­leased state­ment. “We are work­ing ur­gently to gath­er ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion.”

The spokes­man called on “those re­spons­ible for the use of chem­ic­al weapons” to “be held ac­count­able.”

The White House said it form­ally was re­quest­ing that Swedish arms ex­pert Ake Sell­strom and his U.N.-sponsored team probe the new al­leg­a­tions. The in­vest­ig­at­ors ar­rived in the Middle East na­tion late last week to look in­to three claims of pri­or chem­ic­al-arms use.

“The U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ive team, which is cur­rently in Syr­ia, is pre­pared” to in­vest­ig­ate the latest pos­sible chem­ic­al as­sault, “and that is con­sist­ent with its pur­pose and man­date,” Earn­est said. “For the U.N.’s ef­forts to be cred­ible, they must have im­me­di­ate ac­cess to wit­nesses and af­fected in­di­vidu­als, and have the abil­ity to ex­am­ine and col­lect phys­ic­al evid­ence without any in­ter­fer­ence or ma­nip­u­la­tion from the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment.

“If the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment has noth­ing to hide and is truly com­mit­ted to an im­par­tial and cred­ible in­vest­ig­a­tion of chem­ic­al weapons use in Syr­ia,” the spokes­man ad­ded, “it will fa­cil­it­ate the U.N. team’s im­me­di­ate and un­fettered ac­cess to this site.”

Sell­strom earli­er in the day ex­pressed his own in­terest in in­vest­ig­at­ing the fresh al­leg­a­tions of a ma­jor tox­ic gas strike, say­ing that he would lead the in­quiry in­to the pos­sible new at­tack if na­tions from around the globe re­ques­ted it, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted.

Re­ports of massive cas­u­al­ties from the in­cid­ent “sound sus­pi­cious,” and it ap­pears to be “something we need to look in­to,” Sell­strom told SVT tele­vi­sion on Wed­nes­day. “It will de­pend on wheth­er any U.N. mem­ber state goes to the sec­ret­ary gen­er­al and says we should look at this event. We are in place,” Re­u­ters quoted him as say­ing.

U.N. Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon is “aware of the re­ports,” his of­fice tweeted. “We are try­ing to find out more.”

Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment has re­jec­ted rebel as­ser­tions that its forces launched chem­ic­al rock­et strikes on the out­skirts of Dam­as­cus, Re­u­ters said sep­ar­ately. Re­por­ted death tolls from the al­leged as­sault con­flic­ted, but reached in­to the hun­dreds and pos­sibly totaled more than 1,000.

Brit­ish For­eign Sec­ret­ary Wil­li­am Hag­ue said his coun­try would refer the in­cid­ent to the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil, and he urged the As­sad re­gime “to al­low im­me­di­ate ac­cess to the area for the U.N. team,” Re­u­ters re­por­ted. France, Ger­many, Tur­key and the 22-na­tion Ar­ab League each in­di­vidu­ally re­ques­ted that the United Na­tions ex­pand its in­vest­ig­a­tion to in­clude the latest claims.

Rus­sia also re­portedly called for a fair and pro­fes­sion­al in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the new al­leged at­tack. For­eign Min­istry Spokes­man Al­ex­an­der Lukashev­icha said the in­cid­ent’s tim­ing sug­gests it is a “pre-planned pro­voca­tion.”

Former U.N. arms in­vest­ig­at­or Rolf Ekeus told Re­u­ters that “it would be very pe­cu­li­ar if it was the gov­ern­ment to do this at the ex­act mo­ment the in­ter­na­tion­al in­spect­ors come in­to the coun­try.”

“At the least, it wouldn’t be very clev­er,” he ad­ded. The latest event would be sim­pler to as­sess than the past al­leged strikes, be­cause “it is easi­er to do sampling and test­ing, and also to look at the vic­tims, if there are sick people or even dead people (on the scene),” the wire ser­vice sep­ar­ately quoted him as say­ing. “It is easi­er to get to doc­tors and get to the place where the event happened.”

A former European Uni­on In­sti­tute chem­ic­al weapons ana­lyst said he was “skep­tic­al” of pri­or chem­ic­al at­tack re­ports emer­ging from Syr­ia, but “it is clear that something ter­rible has happened” in the latest in­cid­ent.

“The scenes could not have been stage-man­aged,” he wrote in a Wed­nes­day blog post. “However, it is ex­tremely puzz­ling that gov­ern­ment forces would launch a chem­ic­al at­tack pre­cisely at the mo­ment when U.N. in­spect­ors are fi­nally in the coun­try to in­vest­ig­ate some of the earli­er al­leg­a­tions.”

Earn­est, the White House spokes­man, said Wash­ing­ton ad­di­tion­ally has “called for ur­gent con­sulta­tions in the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil to dis­cuss these al­leg­a­tions and to call for the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment to provide im­me­di­ate ac­cess to the U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ive team.”

The United States, he said, was ur­ging “all Syr­i­an parties in­clud­ing the gov­ern­ment and op­pos­i­tion, to provide im­me­di­ate ac­cess to any and all sites of im­port­ance to the in­vest­ig­a­tion and to en­sure se­cur­ity for the U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ive team.”

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
24 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
35 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
47 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×