5 Secrets of the March on Washington

Bayard Rustin, deputy director of the planned March on Washington program, points to a map showing the line of march for the Aug. 28 demonstration for civil rights. Rustin took part in a news conference at the New York City Headquarters in New York on Aug. 24, 1963.
National Journal
Matthew Cooper
See more stories about...
Matthew Cooper
Aug. 21, 2013, 2:53 p.m.

The March on Wash­ing­ton, which took place 50 years ago this month, is bathed in a warm glow for good reas­on. But the story of that day, bey­ond Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech, is sur­pris­ing, funny, poignant.

Here are a few secrets — or little-re­marked-upon as­pects — of the day worth keep­ing in mind as the 50th-an­niversary com­mem­or­a­tions ap­proach.

King’s Speech Was Im­pro­vised — and Edgy.

All schoolkids are taught the “con­tent of their char­ac­ter” part of King’s ad­dress. After the march, when John F. Kennedy wel­comed King and oth­er civil-rights lead­ers to the White House, he said to the rev­er­end: “I have a dream.” “That was like Kennedy say­ing ‘You nailed it,’” says Taylor Branch, the Pulitzer prize-win­ning King bio­graph­er.

King knew he had hit his mark, Branch told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. But while the “dream” sec­tion of the speech is best-re­membered, the first part of King’s speech had been an angry lament about the con­di­tion of blacks in Amer­ica, which he likened to a check re­turned for in­suf­fi­cient funds.

The “dream” por­tion of the speech was semi-im­pro­vised. King had used the dream idea be­fore, in speeches earli­er in 1963, in­clud­ing one to black in­sur­ance agents. King owes a debt to the Bible’s Book of Isai­ah, from which he bor­rowed. But much of the speech that day was ori­gin­al. King also left out some of the an­gri­er and clunki­er lines from his pre­pared speech. For ex­ample: “And so today, let us go back to our com­munit­ies as mem­bers of the in­ter­na­tion­al as­so­ci­ation for the ad­vance­ment of cre­at­ive dis­sat­is­fac­tion.”

For what it’s worth, The New York Times gave King top billing the next day. The Wash­ing­ton Post de­voted its front page to oth­er lead­ers of the march.

D.C. Was Ready for Ri­ots.

The pro­spect of all of those pro­test­ers com­ing to Wash­ing­ton scared the crap out of the Dis­trict of Columbia. As Branch has noted, there were not only 4,000 fed­er­al troops poised in D.C. and 15,000 para­troop­ers on standby, but the city’s li­quor stores were closed for the first time since Pro­hib­i­tion.

Most D.C. busi­nesses shut down for the day. Of course, the day turned out to be in­cred­ibly peace­ful. News­pa­pers favored the word “or­derly.” And it was, which helped give the civil-rights move­ment even more mor­al force. The or­gan­izers of the march even offered to help clean up af­ter­wards, but the Na­tion­al Park Ser­vice, which con­trols the monu­ment, turned them down.

A Gay Man Led the Way.

The or­gan­iz­ing geni­us be­hind the March on Wash­ing­ton was civil-rights vet­er­an Ba­yard Rustin. What is less-known now, or then, is that he was gay. That might have not been known at all had Rustin not been ar­res­ted on what were then called mor­als charges (he was ar­res­ted in 1953 along with two oth­er men in a parked car in Pas­adena, Cal­if.)

King had kept Rustin at a dis­tance un­der pres­sure from oth­er black lead­ers. The late Rep. Adam Clayton Pow­ell Jr. of Har­lem had forced Rustin off of the board of the South­ern Chris­ti­an Lead­er­ship Con­fer­ence and Roy Wilkins, head of the NAACP, didn’t want Rustin run­ning the 1963 march.

But Rustin’s ment­or, A. Philip Ran­dolph, head of the Broth­er­hood of Sleep­ing Car Port­ers, in­sisted. It was Ran­dolph’s idea to have a March on Wash­ing­ton in 1941 to protest se­greg­a­tion — and it was called off only when Pres­id­ent Roosevelt de­seg­reg­ated the de­fense in­dustry. So when the idea sur­faced of a March on Wash­ing­ton in 1963, to de­mand justice on the 100th an­niversary of the end of slavery, Ran­dolph’s word coun­ted above all oth­ers. And it was Rustin who did much of the speak­ing that Au­gust day.

Sen. Strom Thur­mond de­nounced Rustin as a com­mun­ist and ho­mo­sexu­al in a floor state­ment, but the press didn’t pick it up. Rustin died in 1987 and Pres­id­ent Obama will present him, posthum­ously, with the Medal of Free­dom.

Auto­ma­tion and Labor Were a Factor.

It’s of­ten for­got­ten that the March on Wash­ing­ton was a march for free­dom and jobs. The un­em­ploy­ment rate that Au­gust was 5.4 per­cent, low by today’s stand­ards but high­er than it had been earli­er in the ‘60s; then, as now, black un­em­ploy­ment re­mained much high­er than the na­tion­al in­dex.

Many of the speak­ers at the March on Wash­ing­ton in­veighed against “auto­ma­tion” dis­pla­cing work­ers — a har­binger of today’s out­sourcing. But des­pite the jobs fo­cus, or­gan­ized labor was di­vided. Wal­ter Re­uth­er, the head of the United Auto Work­ers, was one of the of­fi­cial lead­ers of the march, and he led his own rally in Michigan earli­er that sum­mer.

But des­pite UAW en­thu­si­asm — and Ran­dolph was, of course, also a uni­on lead­er — the AFL-CIO was AWOL. George Meany, the head of the AFL-CIO, didn’t sup­port the march, and the AFL-CIO’s of­fices were shuttered that day. The march­ers called for nondis­crim­in­a­tion not only in pub­lic fa­cil­it­ies like res­taur­ants but also in uni­ons, and many of those rep­res­en­ted by the AFL-CIO, es­pe­cially the build­ing trades, shut out blacks.

Wo­men Had a Sep­ar­ate March.

There was just one of­fi­cial wo­man speak­er at the March on Wash­ing­ton. There were wo­men sing­ers, in­clud­ing Mari­an An­der­son, who had been fam­ously blocked from speak­ing be­fore the Daugh­ters of the Amer­ic­an Re­volu­tion in 1939 and was in­vited to speak at the Lin­coln Me­mori­al by Elean­or Roosevelt.

But only one wo­man was in­vited to speak at the march, and that was Medgar Evers‘ wid­ow, Myrlie. She wasn’t able to come, so an­oth­er move­ment or­gan­izer, Daisy Lee Bates, spoke 142 words.

There was a sep­ar­ate march on In­de­pend­ence Av­en­ue for wo­men in the move­ment that in­cluded Dorothy Height, the late lead­er of the Coun­cil of Negro Wo­men.

John Lewis Re­wrote His Speech.

Rep. John Lewis of Geor­gia, the civil-rights vet­er­an, will be every­where dur­ing the an­niversary, an eld­er states­man of the move­ment.

In Au­gust 1963, Lewis was head of the Stu­dent Non­vi­ol­ent Co­ordin­at­ing Com­mit­tee and one of the lead­ers of the march sched­uled to speak that day. But the night be­fore the rally, oth­er lead­ers caught a glimpse of his re­marks. The first ver­sion of his speech in­censed many of the oth­er lead­ers of the march, in­clud­ing UAW’s Re­uth­er, who thought it would back­fire on the move­ment by ali­en­at­ing al­lies and giv­ing en­emies a lot to work with.

Lewis, in his ori­gin­al text, said that Pres­id­ent Kennedy’s civil-rights plan was “too little, too late” and it called for the civil- rights work­ers to march through Dixie “like Sher­man.” Would Lewis’s un­spoken words have changed the day? Would King’s?

We’ll nev­er know.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×