These Are the Most Dangerous Jobs in America

If you want to be totally safe, avoid construction and transportation work.

A truck driver at the Minnesota Truck and Step Van Driving Championships Saturday, June 8, 2013. 
National Journal
Matt Berman
Aug. 22, 2013, 7:47 a.m.

Great news! The United States had about 300 few­er fatal work in­jur­ies in 2012 than in 2011, ac­cord­ing to new data from the Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics. But, still, a pre­lim­in­ary total of 4,383 Amer­ic­ans died from in­jur­ies on the job last year.

What are the most dan­ger­ous in­dus­tries to work in?

Con­struc­tion is one place to start. In 2012, 775 people suffered fatal in­jur­ies in the private con­struc­tion sec­tor, up 5 per­cent from 2011. Con­struc­tion and ex­trac­tion oc­cu­pa­tions made up 19 per­cent of the total fatal oc­cu­pa­tion­al in­jur­ies, with 838 fatal­it­ies. Work­ers in the con­struc­tion trades alone made up 13 per­cent of the total. 

The num­ber of con­struc­tion and ex­trac­tion deaths far out­paced the num­ber of law-en­force­ment fatal­it­ies (119) or fire­fight­ing and pre­ven­tion deaths (18). On the whole, there were just 116 on-the-job deaths due to fires and ex­plo­sions. Which sounds like good news, com­pared with 144 fire and ex­plo­sions deaths in 2011.

But, by far, the most leth­al jobs in Amer­ica are in the trans­port­a­tion and ma­ter­i­al-mov­ing sec­tor. There were 1,150 deaths in those jobs in 2012, ac­count­ing for 26 per­cent of all oc­cu­pa­tion­al fatal­it­ies. The bulk of those fatal­it­ies (817) were mo­tor-vehicle op­er­at­ors. Trans­port­a­tion is dan­ger­ous for all work­ers, however: Last year racked up 1,789 oc­cu­pa­tion­al fatal­it­ies in “trans­port­a­tion in­cid­ents.”

Then there are on-the-job hom­icides. At 463 deaths (in­clud­ing 375 in­ten­tion­al shoot­ings), hom­icides ac­coun­ted for 11 per­cent of all oc­cu­pa­tion­al fatal­it­ies, just edged out by the 12 per­cent of fatal­it­ies caused by be­ing “struck by an ob­ject or equip­ment.” There were 767 oc­cu­pa­tion­al deaths due to vi­ol­ence by people or an­im­als, in­clud­ing 225 in­ten­tion­al self-in­flic­ted in­jur­ies. The num­ber of work-re­lated sui­cides did drop by 10 per­cent, however, from 2011.

The best way to avoid oc­cu­pa­tion­al fatal­it­ies? Work­ing for your­self could help: Fatal in­jur­ies among self-em­ployed Amer­ic­ans made up just 23 per­cent of the total. Or you can work in the leg­al field, which coun­ted only 8 deaths last year. You can also try be­ing age 20-24, as fatal in­jur­ies in that group ac­coun­ted for just 6 per­cent of all work-re­lated deaths. But the sure­fire way to boost your odds of sur­viv­al? Be a wo­man. Wo­men ac­coun­ted for only 8 per­cent of all oc­cu­pa­tion­al fatal­it­ies in 2012.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×