Iran Nearly Done Paving Over Suspect Military Grounds: Analysis

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 22, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

Ir­an has nearly fin­ished pav­ing over a mil­it­ary site that some ex­perts al­lege once hos­ted nuc­le­ar weapon-re­lated ex­per­i­ments, ac­cord­ing to a pho­to­graph­ic ana­lys­is re­leased on Thursday by a Wash­ing­ton think tank.

The In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency un­suc­cess­fully sought ac­cess to Ir­an’s Parchin fa­cil­ity in nearly a dozen meet­ings held with Tehran since Novem­ber 2011. The U.N. nuc­le­ar watch­dog or­gan­iz­a­tion had aired sus­pi­cions that a struc­ture based at this loc­a­tion was cap­able of fa­cil­it­at­ing nuc­le­ar-re­lated ex­plos­ives tests and sup­por­ted the de­vel­op­ment of a “neut­ron ini­ti­at­or” for ac­tiv­at­ing atom­ic det­on­a­tions.

“As­phalt­ing an en­tire area in this man­ner would make it very hard to take soil samples and likely be ef­fect­ive at cov­er­ing up en­vir­on­ment­al evid­ence of nuc­le­ar weapon­iz­a­tion-re­lated ex­per­i­ments,” the In­sti­tute for Sci­ence and In­ter­na­tion­al Se­cur­ity said in its as­sess­ment of satel­lite pho­tos taken of the site on Aug. 13.

Ir­an for years has denied in­ter­na­tion­al claims that it is pur­su­ing a nuc­le­ar-arms cap­ab­il­ity, and cer­tain spe­cial­ists have ques­tioned the U.N. agency’s ra­tionale for press­ing to vis­it the Parchin com­pound. The evid­ence be­hind that push — in­tel­li­gence gathered and fur­nished to the agency by IAEA mem­ber gov­ern­ments — re­mains con­fid­en­tial.

Ir­an’s con­struc­tion at Parchin would pre­vent IAEA in­vest­ig­at­ors from draw­ing firm con­clu­sions from any fu­ture in­spec­tion, so the Per­sian Gulf power “has lost an im­port­ant op­por­tun­ity” to dis­prove ac­cus­a­tions that it is at­tempt­ing to con­ceal something, former IAEA safe­guards chief Olli Heinon­en told the As­so­ci­ated Press for a Thursday re­port.

Ali Asghar Soltan­ieh on Wed­nes­day con­firmed that he would step down in less than two weeks as Tehran’s chief IAEA en­voy, mean­ing that any fu­ture talks on U.N. ac­cess to the base would be led by new of­fi­cials on each side, Re­u­ters re­por­ted. Her­man Nack­aerts, who has led the talks for the Vi­enna, Aus­tria-based or­gan­iz­a­tion as its cur­rent top safe­guards of­fi­cial, is set to leave his po­s­i­tion in Septem­ber.

An in­ter­na­tion­al-re­la­tions in­sider with IAEA ties iden­ti­fied Mah­moud Reza Saj­jadi, now Ir­an’s en­voy to Rus­sia, as a likely pick to suc­ceed Soltan­ieh, IT­AR-Tass re­por­ted.

Mean­while, a seni­or Is­raeli of­fi­cial this week fur­ther played down the con­sequences of a po­ten­tial at­tack on Ir­a­ni­an atom­ic sites.

“I sup­pose there would be a re­sponse of two or three days of mis­sile fire, per­haps even on Is­rael, [or] on Amer­ic­an bases in the Gulf. But I don’t think it would be more than that — very lim­ited dam­age,” Yuval Stein­itz — Is­raeli min­is­ter for in­ter­na­tion­al af­fairs, strategy and in­tel­li­gence — told the Times of Is­rael in an in­ter­view.

He urged NATO or the United States to threaten Ir­an with armed force if Tehran does not fall in­to line with U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil de­mands by a spe­cif­ic date. The 15-na­tion body has called in part for Ir­an to fully sus­pend its en­rich­ment of urani­um. However, Tehran ar­gues it leg­ally is en­titled to pur­sue that activ­ity, which can gen­er­ate fuel for ci­vil­ian use as well as bomb ma­ter­i­al.

Else­where, China this year vastly in­creased its pur­chases of “fuel oil” from Ir­an, a sub­stance not covered by U.S. eco­nom­ic pen­al­ties tar­get­ing Ir­a­ni­an ex­ports of un­re­fined pet­ro­leum, the Wall Street Journ­al re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day.

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
2 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×