On Heels of Suspected Syrian Gas Attack, McCain Renews Call for U.S. Military Action

Emelie Rutherford, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Emelie Rutherford, Global Security Newswire
Aug. 22, 2013, 12:02 p.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Sen­at­or John Mc­Cain (R-Ar­iz.) on Thursday said it is “long past time” for U.S. and al­lied na­tions to take lim­ited mil­it­ary ac­tion again Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment forces, fol­low­ing re­ports of an al­leged chem­ic­al at­tack this week that killed hun­dreds of ci­vil­ians.

Mc­Cain’s strenu­ous re­it­er­a­tion of his plea for Wash­ing­ton’s stronger in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia came as the White House called for Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad to al­low a U.N. team already in the coun­try to in­vest­ig­ate the re­por­ted at­tacks — the most-severe al­leged chem­ic­al strikes against ci­vil­ians in the bloody two years of civil war.

While the U.S. mil­it­ary has not dir­ectly used force against Syr­ia, Chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mar­tin De­mp­sey de­scribed po­ten­tial “lim­ited mil­it­ary op­tions” in a let­ter this week to a U.S. con­gress­man. The top gen­er­al cau­tioned, though, that Syr­i­an rebels might not pro­mote Amer­ic­an in­terests if they gained con­trol of the Middle East­ern na­tion.

Mc­Cain on Thursday said in his state­ment that re­ports of As­sad’s forces es­cal­at­ing their al­leged use of chem­ic­al weapons to in­flict an un­pre­ced­en­ted num­ber of cas­u­al­ties should com­pel Pres­id­ent Obama to pur­sue a po­ten­tially game-chan­ging re­sponse.

“It is long past time for the United States and our friends and al­lies to re­spond to As­sad’s con­tinu­ing mass at­ro­cit­ies in Syr­ia with de­cis­ive ac­tions, in­clud­ing lim­ited mil­it­ary strikes to de­grade As­sad’s air power and bal­list­ic mis­sile cap­ab­il­it­ies,” said Mc­Cain, a seni­or mem­ber of the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee.

Mc­Cain cri­ti­cized Obama for not tak­ing stronger ac­tion in re­sponse to re­ports of the re­gime’s chem­ic­al-weapons use after hav­ing drawn a “red line” last year against any such Syr­i­an as­saults. The Ari­zona sen­at­or, who lost his 2008 White House bid to Obama, charged the pres­id­ent’s ac­tions re­gard­ing Syr­ia have helped weak­en Amer­ic­an cred­ib­il­ity in the Middle East.

“As a res­ult, the killing goes on, As­sad re­mains in power, and his use of chem­ic­al weapons against Syr­i­an ci­vil­ians ap­par­ently con­tin­ues,” Mc­Cain said, build­ing on his pre­vi­ous cri­ti­cism of U.S. policy on Syr­ia.

Josh Earn­est, a White House spokes­man, on Thursday called for As­sad to grant the U.N. in­vest­ig­a­tion team im­me­di­ate ac­cess to the site of the al­leged pois­on at­tack near Dam­as­cus, so they can talk to eye­wit­nesses and take phys­ic­al samples from the en­vir­on­ment and sus­pec­ted vic­tims. He re­layed the same re­quest a day earli­er.

“You have an As­sad re­gime that denies re­spons­ib­il­ity for the use of these chem­ic­al weapons. The easi­est way for them to demon­strate that they are on the side of the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity in op­pos­i­tion to the use of chem­ic­al weapons is to al­low this U.N. team full ac­cess to the site to try to get to the bot­tom of what happened,” Earn­est told re­port­ers aboard Air Force One on Thursday.

Seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials also are in touch with their coun­ter­parts around the world “to co­ordin­ate on our re­sponse,” the Obama spokes­man said.

Syr­i­an rebels provided hor­rif­ic de­scrip­tions and videos of the al­leged at­tacks, which some ac­counts claim killed more than 1,000 people. The As­sad re­gime dis­missed re­ports of the grue­some carnage as made up by the rebel fight­ers.

Deputy U.N. Sec­ret­ary-Gen­er­al Jan Eli­asson on Wed­nes­day told re­port­ers that he and Sec­ret­ary-Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon hoped the Syr­i­an re­gime would con­sent to al­low­ing U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ors to probe the latest chem­ic­al-strike charges. The world body’s Se­cur­ity Coun­cil, though, stopped short of for­cing a probe of the Syr­i­an rebels’ al­leg­a­tions.

Maria Cristina Per­cev­al, an Ar­gen­tini­an am­bas­sad­or who is serving as ro­tat­ing pres­id­ent of the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil this month, late on Wed­nes­day told re­port­ers that there is “strong con­cern among the coun­cil mem­bers.” Fol­low­ing an emer­gency meet­ing of the coun­cil, she said mem­bers be­lieve they need more clar­ity on what happened in Syr­ia and want to fol­low de­vel­op­ments closely, ac­cord­ing to the U.N. News Ser­vice.

Eli­asson on Wed­nes­day told re­port­ers that there had been no con­firm­a­tion of the pois­on-gas at­tack and seni­or U.N. of­fi­cials were in con­tact with the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment, ac­cord­ing to the news out­let. He said the U.N.-sponsored in­vest­ig­a­tion team already in Syr­ia prob­ing oth­er al­leged chem­ic­al at­tacks, led by Swedish arms ex­pert Ake Sell­strom, was poised to act.

In terms of U.S. in­volve­ment in the on­go­ing con­flict, De­mp­sey said in his Aug. 19 let­ter that the United States, the­or­et­ic­ally, could pur­sue lim­ited mil­it­ary ac­tion in Syr­ia that would com­mit Wash­ing­ton to a dir­ect role in the civil war but, at the same time, would of­fer little value in terms of of­fer­ing rebel forces a de­cis­ive edge.

The four-star gen­er­al took some flack on Cap­it­ol Hill last month for a let­ter he wrote ex­press­ing re­ser­va­tions about the Pentagon’s dir­ect use of force, in the form of stand-off strikes of high-value As­sad re­gime forces and fa­cil­it­ies that could cost bil­lions of dol­lars.

De­mp­sey’s Ju­ly 19 let­ter went to Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee Chair­man Carl Lev­in (D-Mich.), while his latest missive was a re­sponse to a query from House For­eign Af­fairs Com­mit­tee Rank­ing Mem­ber Eli­ot En­gel (D-N.Y.).

De­mp­sey told En­gel, in the let­ter the con­gress­man’s of­fice re­leased on Wed­nes­day, that “there are cer­tainly ac­tions short of tip­ping the bal­ance of the con­flict [in fa­vor of the Syr­i­an op­pos­i­tion] that could im­pose a cost on [As­sad’s forces] for un­ac­cept­able be­ha­vi­or.” Those in­clude des­troy­ing the Syr­i­an air force, the U.S. gen­er­al said.

“The loss of As­sad’s air force would neg­ate his abil­ity to at­tack op­pos­i­tion forces from the air, but it would also es­cal­ate and po­ten­tially fur­ther com­mit the United State to the con­flict,” De­mp­sey wrote. “Stated an­oth­er way, it would not be mil­it­ar­ily de­cis­ive, but it would com­mit us de­cis­ively to the con­flict.”

De­mp­sey cau­tioned that choos­ing sides in Syr­ia would not be simple for the United States, which in real­ity would have to choose “among many sides.”

“It is my be­lief that the side we choose must be ready to pro­mote their in­terests and ours when the bal­ance shifts in their fa­vor,” he wrote. “Today, they are not.” He said the United States should “eval­u­ate the ef­fect­ive­ness of lim­ited mil­it­ary op­tions” while con­sid­er­ing there is a deeply rooted, long-term con­flict among sun­dry fac­tions in Syr­ia.

De­mp­sey said the United States has ad­di­tion­al op­tions for ac­tion in Syr­ia, in­clud­ing “ex­pan­ded ca­pa­city-build­ing ef­forts with re­gion­al part­ners and a sig­ni­fic­ant in­vest­ment in the de­vel­op­ment of a mod­er­ate Syr­i­an op­pos­i­tion.”

Dur­ing the White House press con­fer­ence on Wed­nes­day, Earn­est noted that Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials said even “be­fore there was an in­tel­li­gence-com­munity as­sess­ment that chem­ic­al weapons had been used, that those in­di­vidu­als who were re­spons­ible for safe­guard­ing chem­ic­al weapons would be held ac­count­able for the way that those chem­ic­al weapons are handled.”

He noted lim­ited U.S. as­sist­ance to Syr­i­an rebel fight­ers, in the form of small arms, as well as hu­man­it­ari­an as­sist­ance to ci­vil­ians. He ac­know­ledged that there is more “work that can be done with our in­ter­na­tion­al part­ners to try to con­tin­ue to pres­sure the As­sad re­gime.”

The White House spokes­man in­dic­ated that Obama is not ready to call for more-sig­ni­fic­ant U.S. mil­it­ary as­sist­ance to Syr­i­an rebels.

Obama “has as­sessed that the best way for us to tackle this prob­lem is to work closely with our in­ter­na­tion­al al­lies to present a united front to the As­sad re­gime,” Earn­est said.

The gov­ern­ment-con­trolled Syr­i­an Ar­ab News Agency re­por­ted Thursday that an “of­fi­cial spokes­man” at the coun­try’s For­eign and Ex­pat­ri­ates Min­istry charged that Syr­i­an rebels made up the re­ports that of tox­ic-gas at­tacks near Dam­as­cus be­cause they didn’t like the agree­ment the re­gime made with the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity to in­vest­ig­ate oth­er al­leged at­tacks in the coun­try.

“The spokes­man said that the For­eign and Ex­pat­ri­ates Min­istry af­firms that these al­leg­a­tions are false and un­true, and that the min­istry would like to point out that Syr­ia has re­peatedly an­nounced that it will nev­er use any weapons of mass de­struc­tion against its own people, if such weapons ex­ist,” the Syr­i­an news out­let re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
White House Adds Five New SCOTUS Candidates
3 hours ago

President Trump added five new names to his Supreme Court short list on Friday, should a need arise to appoint a new justice. The list now numbers 25 individuals. They are: 7th Circuit Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, Georgia Supreme Court Justice Britt C. Grant, District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, 11th Circuit Appeals Judge Kevin C. Newsom, and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.

Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
3 hours ago

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
5 hours ago
Steele Says Follow the Money
6 hours ago

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
7 hours ago

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.