As Hawaii marks the 54th anniversary of its statehood this month, we’re reminded that the future of one of the country’s territories remains in flux. Last November, Puerto Ricans voted in a plebiscite — the fourth of its kind since 1967 — in favor of statehood for the first time ever.
Despite the results, conversations about the future of what some call America’s last colony have petered out. Congress held a hearing on Puerto Rico’s status at the beginning of this month, with senators calling for a change, any change.
“After 115 years, it is clearly time for Puerto Rico to determine what political path it will take,” Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said at the hearing, referring to 1898, the year Spain ceded Puerto Rico to the United States. “The current status undermines our nation’s moral standing around the world.”
What’s keeping Puerto Rico in political limbo?
While more voting is sure to come, lawmakers from the island and the mainland have yet to figure out what to ask Puerto Ricans on the ballot. The Senate committee leaders read last year’s results as Puerto Ricans rejecting the current status, but some question the validity of the voting outcome. The first question on the ballot asked voters if they favored U.S. territory status; 54 percent said they didn’t. The second asked voters to choose from three options: statehood, independence, or sovereign free association — a status that would give Puerto Rico more autonomy than it currently has.
Sixty-one percent chose statehood, but 26 percent of voters left the ballot blank. Puerto Rico Gov. Alejandro Garcia Padilla believes this shrank support for statehood to 44 percent. He calls for something like the current commonwealth status, not full-fledged statehood, but at this month’s hearing he didn’t provide details on how that would work.
Meanwhile, Resident Commissioner Pedro Pierluisi, the island’s nonvoting member of Congress and a statehood supporter, is pushing for a federally commissioned “yes” or “no” vote to decide Puerto Rico’s future once and for all, just like the one for Hawaii 54 years ago. Pierluisi’s party, the New Progressive Party, filed a lawsuit this summer against Padilla, claiming the governor was trying to dissuade lawmakers on the mainland from supporting statehood.
Wyden says an “enhanced commonwealth” such as the one Padilla is proposing is not an option. Padilla counters that neither is statehood, saying that last year’s vote was “an electoral process rigged in favor of statehood” because it didn’t include a range of different options, a process known as self-determination. While he hasn’t said as much, under Padilla’s standards, the ballot that helped determine Hawaii’s future in 1959 would be considered a fraud.
Although it doesn’t matter now, the Hawaiian plebiscite vote was once questioned too. “It pretended that Hawaii did not have to go through a self-determination,” says Jonathan Osorio, a Hawaiian studies professor at University of Hawaii (Manoa). “We were not given the full range of options.”
U.S. lawmakers are anxious to redefine Puerto Rico’s status. But the tug-of-war between its leaders, combined with uncertainty about past state-commissioned votes and fidgeting over potential federal ones, suggest that the island will have to keep waiting.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."