Early Western Intel: Assad Used Chemical Arms

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 23, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

Early U.S. and European in­tel­li­gence find­ings in­dic­ate that Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s re­gime car­ried out a chem­ic­al strike near Dam­as­cus on Wed­nes­day, prob­ably with back­ing from seni­or lead­ers, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

Rus­sia on Fri­day joined oth­er na­tions call­ing for a U.N. team now in Syr­ia to in­vest­ig­ate the al­leged as­sault that might have killed hun­dreds of people, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted.

U.N. Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon has dis­patched a top dis­arm­a­ment of­fi­cial to the Syr­i­an cap­it­al to form­ally re­quest ac­cess to the scene of the al­leged at­tack, ac­cord­ing to a Thursday re­lease.

The claims “need to be in­vest­ig­ated without delay,” his of­fice said in a state­ment. Speak­ing on Fri­day, Ban said “it’s a mat­ter of time when we will par­ti­cip­ate (in the Syr­i­an in­cid­ent),” the Xin­hua News Agency re­por­ted. The U.N. chief was to meet on Fri­day with of­fi­cials from the United King­dom, and top en­voys from the United States and Qatar also would par­ti­cip­ate in talks, Brit­ish For­eign Min­is­ter Wil­li­am Hag­ue said in com­ments re­por­ted by Re­u­ters.

Pres­id­ent Obama in an in­ter­view aired Fri­day told CNN that Wash­ing­ton of­fi­cials “don’t ex­pect co­oper­a­tion” from of­fi­cials in Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment.”

Mo­scow, though, ac­cused en­emies of Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment of re­fus­ing “to guar­an­tee the safety and ef­fect­ive work of U.N. ex­perts on [rebel] ter­rit­ory,” Re­u­ters re­por­ted. The op­pos­i­tion in the coun­try’s civil war “is dir­ectly pre­vent­ing an ob­ject­ive in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the pos­sible use of chem­ic­al weapons in Syr­ia,” ac­cord­ing to writ­ten com­ments re­leased by the Rus­si­an For­eign Min­istry.

The West­ern-backed Syr­i­an Na­tion­al Co­ali­tion later said it would “en­sure the safety of the U.N. team,” the wire ser­vice re­por­ted sep­ar­ately.

“It is crit­ic­al that those in­spect­ors get there with­in 48 hours,” spokes­man Khaled Saleh said.

More than 30 na­tions have called for the U.N. in­vest­ig­a­tion to ex­pand its on-the-ground probe — launched on Monday to re­view past chem­ic­al at­tack claims — to in­clude the latest al­leg­a­tions, USA Today re­por­ted. Syr­i­an rebels have at­trib­uted 800 to 1,700 deaths to Wed­nes­day’s in­cid­ent.

In­de­pend­ent ana­lyses ap­peared to be co­ales­cing around a view that the event in­volved sar­in or an­oth­er nerve agent, the Lon­don Guard­i­an re­por­ted. Neigh­bor­ing gov­ern­ments and West­ern powers are ex­pec­ted with­in days to ob­tain ma­ter­i­als taken from the site of the al­leged at­tack, ac­cord­ing to the news­pa­per.

In his re­marks to CNN, Obama said a chem­ic­al strike “starts get­ting to some core na­tion­al in­terests that the United States has, both in terms of us mak­ing sure that weapons of mass de­struc­tion are not pro­lif­er­at­ing, as well as need­ing to pro­tect our al­lies, our bases in the re­gion.”

He ad­ded, though, that “if the U.S. goes in and at­tacks an­oth­er coun­try without a U.N. man­date and without clear evid­ence that can be presen­ted, then there are ques­tions in terms of wheth­er in­ter­na­tion­al law sup­ports it [and] do we have the co­ali­tion to make it work.”

The need for crit­ic­al U.S. choices on Syr­ia has grown more ur­gent, Obama in­dic­ated in the CNN in­ter­view. The De­fense De­part­ment as of Thursday was re­vis­ing op­tions for pos­sible air at­tacks against Syr­i­an armed forces fa­cil­it­ies and oth­er sites con­trolled by As­sad, the Wall Street Journ­al re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
CHINA OBJECTS
U.S. Destroyer Sails Close to Artificial Chinese Island
19 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

A Navy destroyer sailed within 12 miles of an artificial island built by China in the South China Sea, one of several such islands at the center of territorial disputes with other nearby nations. The U.S. called it a "freedom of navigation exercise." Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Ren Guoqiang "said China had lodged stern representations to the U.S over the patrol and that such moves were not conducive to peace and stability in the South China Sea."

Source:
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
1 hours ago
BREAKING
OVER LEAKS
U.K. Police No Longer Sharing Manchester Info With U.S.
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
DAY BEFORE ELECTION
Montana House Candidate Charged With Assault
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Greg Gianforte, the Montana Republican candidate for the state's lone House seat, was cited for misdemeanor assault Wednesday night after he allegedly body-slammed Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs. Jacobs entered a room in which Gianforte was preparing to give an interview to Fox News, and asked Gianforte about the recently released CBO score on health care legislation, at which point, according to an account from Fox News's Alicia Acuna, Gianforte put both hands around Jacobs's neck and slammed him to the ground. The Gallatin County Sheriff’s Office put out a statement saying there was probable cause for the citation but not the injuries required for it to be considered a felony. Gianforte's aide put out an erroneous statement saying Jacobs grabbed Gianforte by the wrist after aggressively putting a recorder in Gianforte's face.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login