On MLK Anniversary, Black Numbers Are Up in Congress, but Power Is Down

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., center, accompanied by fellow members of the Congressional Black Caucus, speaks to reporters outside the White House in Washington, Thursday, March 11, 2010, following a meeting with President Barack Obama. From left are, House Majority Whip James Clyburn of S.C., Rep Hank Johnson, D-Ga., Lee, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.,and Rep. David Scott, D-Ga. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)  
National Journal
Beth Reinhard
Aug. 26, 2013, 2 a.m.

When Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr. de­livered his “I Have a Dream” speech 50 years ago this week, just five Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans held seats in Con­gress. There are 44 today.

But those num­bers mask a hard real­ity: Even with an Afric­an-Amer­ic­an in the White House, blacks ar­gu­ably have less clout in Con­gress than they did in 1963.

“If you look at the le­gis­la­tion from that era, it was 1,000 times more fa­vor­able for Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans than it is now be­cause they were deal­ing with civil rights, labor law, and the min­im­um wage,” said Dav­id Bos­it­is, a schol­ar of black polit­ics at the Joint Cen­ter for Polit­ic­al and Eco­nom­ic Stud­ies. “What can col­lect­ively the black mem­bers of Con­gress point to that they have ac­com­plished in this Con­gress?”

Three pri­or­it­ies lis­ted on the Con­gres­sion­al Black Caucus’s web­site—pro­tect­ing vot­ing rights, passing com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form, and main­tain­ing so­cial- and eco­nom­ic-safety nets—have little mo­mentum in the Re­pub­lic­an-dom­in­ated House.

Gun con­trol, which was a fo­cus of the most re­cent meet­ing between Pres­id­ent Obama and the CBC, has slid off the front burn­er since the Sen­ate failed to pass an as­sault -eapons ban in April.

The most sig­ni­fic­ant law to come out of Con­gress in years, which will help in­sure mil­lions of poor Amer­ic­ans, is be­ing re­buffed by gov­ernors throughout the South, where more than half of the black pop­u­la­tion lives.

And in a par­tic­u­larly bit­ter blow to black mem­bers, the Su­preme Court gut­ted part of the Vot­ing Rights Act in June, open­ing the door to states es­cal­at­ing vot­ing re­stric­tions.

For Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans in Con­gress, it feels like they are go­ing back­wards.

“We don’t have the col­lect­ive im­pact that we should have, and we don’t have the re­la­tion­ship with Barack Obama that people think we have,” said Rep. Al­cee Hast­ings, who in 1992 was among the first Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans elec­ted to Con­gress from Flor­ida since Re­con­struc­tion. “I don’t have as much hope as I used to and, in some ways, great­er fears. It’s re­mark­able that we’ve come this far but damned up­set­ting that we still have so far to go.”

One key hurdle is ob­vi­ous: All of the Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans in the House are Demo­crats serving in the minor­ity, with scarce hope for a takeover in 2014. No mat­ter their race or eth­ni­city, few House Demo­crats man­age to get their way in an in­sti­tu­tion where the ma­jor­ity rules. What’s more, an in­creas­ingly po­lar­ized polit­ic­al cli­mate has left Con­gress more grid­locked than ever. No one is get­ting much done, and the black mem­bers are no ex­cep­tion.

An­oth­er reas­on for their lim­ited in­flu­ence is that most come from re­l­at­ively safe vot­ing dis­tricts. Party lead­ers tend to dole out plum as­sign­ments and op­por­tun­it­ies to carry le­gis­la­tion to mem­bers fa­cing com­pet­it­ive elec­tions, a strategy that once al­lowed the smal­ler caucus of mod­er­ate Demo­crats known as the Blue Dogs to wield sig­ni­fic­ant clout. The ban on so-called ear­marks also pre­cludes black mem­bers (as well as their white col­leagues) from set­ting aside money for pet pro­jects in their dis­trict.

Hast­ings re­called vis­it­ing a city in his dis­trict re­cently where he had once dir­ec­ted $11 mil­lion for pro­grams for frail seni­ors and at-risk chil­dren.

“That money is taken away from me now,” he said. “I am dis­ap­poin­ted that as a rep­res­ent­at­ive, ex­cept for sym­bol­ic­ally, I am un­able to make the big im­pact that I would like to have made. But as the say­ing goes, the struggle con­tin­ues.”

Rep. Charles Ran­gel of New York, a found­ing mem­ber of the CBC in 1971, said, “This is the ap­pro­pri­ate time for a march, not just for com­mem­or­at­ing what happened 50 years ago but to reded­ic­ate ourselves to the struggle for civil rights.”

At the top of the agenda is heed­ing the Su­preme Court’s de­mand that Con­gress re­vamp a pro­vi­sion of the Vot­ing Rights Act that re­quired loc­al­it­ies with a his­tory of ra­cial bi­as to get fed­er­al ap­prov­al be­fore chan­ging vot­ing prac­tices. Al­though some black Demo­crats point to en­cour­aging signs from top Re­pub­lic­ans, such as House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor of Vir­gin­ia and Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee mem­ber Jim Sensen­bren­ner of Wis­con­sin, there ap­pears to be little mo­mentum for re­form in the House. The bur­den seems to be fall­ing to the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, which last week sued the state of Texas over its new voter ID law.

“The gains made un­der the Vot­ing Rights Act must be pre­served amid these threats to turn the clock back,” de­clared Rep. Bar­bara Lee, D-Cal­if., who spent part of her child­hood in Texas. “We have to be vi­gil­ant be­cause all would be lost if left up to the tea-party Re­pub­lic­ans.”

Former Rep. Al­len West, the lone Re­pub­lic­an mem­ber of the Con­gres­sion­al Black Caucus in 2011 and 2012, called blam­ing the GOP a “cop-out.” The caucus should get its pri­or­it­ies straight, he said, and spend more time rais­ing aware­ness about teen preg­nancy and pro­mot­ing school choice.

“I think the chal­lenge for the CBC, the NAACP, and oth­er groups is wheth­er their pri­or­it­ies are in line with what’s plaguing the black com­munity,” West said. “If you want to ex­pand the de­pend­ency so­ci­ety, that’s not what Re­pub­lic­ans or con­ser­vat­ives or even the black com­munity be­lieves in.”

The Sen­ate’s sole Afric­an-Amer­ic­an—Re­pub­lic­an Tim Scott of South Car­o­lina—chooses not to par­ti­cip­ate in the CBC.

“I’m not a mem­ber be­cause ul­ti­mately I be­lieve I get more done and that we’re bet­ter off not join­ing or­gan­iz­a­tions that cre­ate lines of de­lin­eation,” said Scott, who was ap­poin­ted in Decem­ber by Gov. Nikki Haley to serve out Jim De­Mint’s term. “They cer­tainly have some play­ers with in­flu­ence, but ul­ti­mately the CBC’s po­s­i­tions are in­con­sist­ent with where I think our coun­try needs to head. It’s a philo­sophy that the growth of gov­ern­ment is go­ing to make our people stronger and our people bet­ter, and I don’t think the an­swer is yes.”

The CBC has had its suc­cesses over the years. It pushed for anti-apartheid sanc­tions against South Africa in the mid-1980s, helped es­tab­lish King’s birth­day as a fed­er­al hol­i­day, and was a driv­ing force be­hind get­ting as­sist­ance to vic­tims of Hur­ricane Kat­rina.

More re­cently, Rep. Fre­der­ica Wilson, D-Fla., said the caucus has been ef­fect­ive on some lower-pro­file is­sues, such as mak­ing more fam­il­ies eli­gible for col­lege loans, com­pens­at­ing black farm­ers who faced dis­crim­in­a­tion, and dis­cour­aging pro­sec­utors from seek­ing harsh pris­on sen­tences for non­vi­ol­ent drug of­fend­ers.

“There’s only so much we can do in­di­vidu­ally, but there’s a great deal we can do as a caucus,” Wilson said. “You can’t al­ways do it in the pub­lic and in the press but you have to stick to­geth­er.” She sighed and ad­ded, “It’s not easy.”

Ex­acer­bat­ing the frus­tra­tions felt by some black Demo­crats is a sense of re­spons­ib­il­ity to carry on the leg­acy of the civil-rights move­ment amid pain­ful memor­ies of se­greg­a­tion and on­go­ing ra­cial in­equit­ies. Rep. Terri Sewell of Alabama, who hails from one of the birth­places of the move­ment, noted that the me­di­an in­come for a fam­ily of four in her dis­trict, which is 64 per­cent black, is $30,327.

“Grow­ing up in Selma, Alabama, you grow up very con­scious of the fact that you are a be­ne­fi­ciary of the move­ment and that the best way you could strengthen the leg­acy of those whose shoulders you stand on is to con­tin­ue to press for so­cial and eco­nom­ic change,” Sewell said. “It’s a full-circle mo­ment for me, be­cause the is­sues that af­fected the dis­trict when I was a col­lege in­tern are still the is­sues now, 28 years later. It’s un­ac­cept­able to be in an in­sti­tu­tion where you can make a dif­fer­ence, and yet we’re not ad­dress­ing the ma­jor is­sues of the day.”

What keeps her go­ing? The por­trait of Shir­ley Chisholm, the first black wo­man elec­ted to Con­gress in 1969, hanging in the Cap­it­ol. “I get a pep in my step be­cause there’s no way my jour­ney is as hard as what she faced,” said Sewell, whose moth­er was the first Afric­an-Amer­ic­an to serve on the Selma City Coun­cil. “I can in no way be tired.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4400) }}

What We're Following See More »
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”