Obama, Assad, and the Credibility Game

The U.S. president knows he must strike, while the Syrian dictator plays for time.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad speaks to journalists after his meeting with French President Nicolas Sarkozy at the Elysee Palace, in Paris, November 13, 2008. The visiting leader  said that US President Barack Obama should come up with a firm plan of action to renew peace talks between Syria and Israel.  UPI/Eco Clement
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
Aug. 26, 2013, 2:12 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama, cri­ti­cized for delay­ing a pun­it­ive mil­it­ary re­sponse in Syr­ia, in­dic­ated on Sunday that some kind of ac­tion against dic­tat­or Bashar al-As­sad was im­min­ent. As­sad, mean­while, ap­peared to be try­ing to shore up his re­gime by in­vit­ing U.N. in­spect­ors to probe al­leg­a­tions of chem­ic­al-weapons use, thus of­fer­ing a meas­ure of ap­pease­ment to the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity.

For both Obama and As­sad, the moves amoun­ted to not­able con­ces­sions. In a CNN in­ter­view on Sunday, Obama con­tin­ued to take the line that there is little the United States can do to af­fect the out­come in Syr­ia. Non­ethe­less, the pres­id­ent ap­pears to be tak­ing on board ar­gu­ments that his cred­ib­il­ity is at risk if he doesn’t act soon. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has an­nounced twice since June that it be­lieves the Syr­i­an re­gime has used chem­ic­al weapons against its own people and has there­fore crossed the “red line” the pres­id­ent laid down a year ago. But there has been no dis­cern­ible change in U.S. policy as yet.

As­sad, who has found him­self in­creas­ingly isol­ated in­ter­na­tion­ally ex­cept for sup­port from Ir­an and Rus­sia, seems to be sens­ing a shift in the wind of the Ar­ab Spring, one that might help him to gloss over the bru­tal­ity of the counter-in­sur­rec­tion that has left more than 100,000 of his people dead. In re­cent weeks, the demo­cracy move­ment that began in Tunisia and Egypt has been oddly trans­formed in­to pop­u­lar sup­port for a mil­it­ary re­gime not un­like As­sad’s. Neigh­bor­ing states that have sought As­sad’s ouster, such as Saudi Ar­a­bia and some of the Gulf coun­tries, are now back­ing the Egyp­tian junta des­pite a bloody crack­down that has left more than a thou­sand Egyp­tian pro­test­ers dead. And, like As­sad, the Egyp­tian mil­it­ary sees it­self as ar­rayed against rad­ic­al Is­lam­ists.

Des­pite As­sad’s ap­par­ent shift in per­mit­ting the U.N. in to in­spect the sites of a pur­por­ted chem­ic­al-weapons at­tack, U.S. of­fi­cials hardened the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s line on Sunday, in­dic­at­ing strongly that some kind of mil­it­ary re­sponse was be­ing planned. “At this junc­ture, the be­lated de­cision by the re­gime to grant ac­cess to the U.N. team is too late to be cred­ible,” one seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said after a week­end-long series of meet­ings about how to re­spond. This of­fi­cial said As­sad’s con­ces­sion would change noth­ing “be­cause the evid­ence avail­able has been sig­ni­fic­antly cor­rup­ted as a res­ult of the re­gime’s per­sist­ent shelling and oth­er in­ten­tion­al ac­tions over the last five days.”¦ Based on the re­por­ted num­ber of vic­tims, re­por­ted symp­toms of those who were killed or in­jured, wit­ness ac­counts, and oth­er facts gathered by open sources, the U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity, and in­ter­na­tion­al part­ners, there is very little doubt at this point that a chem­ic­al weapon was used by the Syr­i­an re­gime against ci­vil­ians in this in­cid­ent.”

The of­fi­cial said vari­ous mil­it­ary op­tions were be­ing con­sidered. Those are said to in­clude sur­gic­al strikes us­ing air­craft or cruise mis­siles. Yet even here, the pres­id­ent and his spokespeople were care­ful to lim­it the para­met­ers of likely mil­it­ary ac­tion to what may amount to a one-off op­er­a­tion. In an in­ter­view on CNN, Obama said the re­ports about chem­ic­al-weapons use, which in­clude some vivid video of dead wo­men and chil­dren, in­dic­ate “this is clearly a big event of grave con­cern.” But he ad­ded that the U.S. is “mov­ing through the U.N. to try to prompt bet­ter ac­tion,” and that Amer­ica will “work with­in an in­ter­na­tion­al frame­work to do everything we can to see As­sad ous­ted.” Obama also cau­tioned that “the no­tion that the U.S. can some­how solve what is a sec­tari­an, com­plex prob­lem in­side of Syr­ia some­times is over­stated.”

For Obama, the crit­ic­al ques­tion will be wheth­er he can re­store some cred­ib­il­ity to a Mideast policy that has been roundly cri­ti­cized for be­ing in­de­cis­ive and re­act­ive, without get­ting too en­meshed in Syr­ia. Coun­cil on For­eign Re­la­tions Pres­id­ent Richard Haass, writ­ing in the Fin­an­cial Times, sug­gests that lim­ited ac­tion such as cruise-mis­sile strikes against chem­ic­al-weapons sites or Syr­i­an com­mand and con­trol might do just that, of­fer­ing “a way to re­in­force crit­ic­al norms without get­ting drawn in­to a costly and un­cer­tain war.”

But some ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials re­main con­cerned about the in­fam­ous “Pot­tery Barn” rule at­trib­uted to former Sec­ret­ary of State Colin Pow­ell, who re­portedly warned Pres­id­ent George W. Bush be­fore the in­va­sion of Ir­aq, “If you break it, you own it.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4401) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
30 minutes ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
30 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×