What the Government Won’t Tell You About the ‘March on Washington’

And what does Louis Farrakhan have to do with it?

It can be difficult, and often dangerous, for government agencies to produce crowd estimates
National Journal
Patrick Reis
See more stories about...
Patrick Reis
Aug. 26, 2013, 8:30 a.m.

Want to know how many people at­ten­ded this week­end’s com­mem­or­a­tion of Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech?

Don’t ask the Na­tion­al Park Ser­vice. Of­fi­cials there won’t tell you. In fact, they won’t even guess.

Con­gress has banned the ser­vice from pro­du­cing crowd-size es­tim­ates, hop­ing to spare the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment the con­tro­versy it en­countered fol­low­ing the Mil­lion Man March of the 1990s.

In 1995, Louis Far­rakhan and oth­er mem­bers of the Na­tion­al Afric­an Amer­ic­an Lead­er­ship Sum­mit en­deavored to bring 1 mil­lion people to the Na­tion­al Mall to bring at­ten­tion to prob­lems faced by black men.

Fol­low­ing the protest, the Park Ser­vice es­tim­ated the crowd at 400,000, less than half the num­ber the or­gan­izers had hoped for. In­censed, Far­rakhan ac­cused the gov­ern­ment of de­lib­er­ately low-balling its es­tim­ate to un­der­state the march’s im­port­ance, even­ing threat­en­ing to sue the Park Ser­vice over its es­tim­ate.

In a sub­sequent ap­pro­pri­ations bill, Con­gress banned the ser­vice from us­ing any funds to carry out crowd es­tim­ates, say­ing that or­gan­iz­a­tions should hire private firms to pro­duce crowd es­tim­ates.

There re­mains no con­sensus fig­ure on the size of the Mil­lion Man March, with some non­fed­er­al es­tim­ates back­ing the NPS fig­ure — which the ser­vice has not re­trac­ted — and oth­er es­tim­ates put­ting the num­ber closer to 900,000.

As for this week­end’s “I Have a Dream” com­mem­or­a­tion, most me­dia out­lets have stayed vague. The Wash­ing­ton Post and Na­tion­al Pub­lic Ra­dio went with “thou­sands” (Wash­ing­ton Post), while the As­so­ci­ated Press op­ted for “tens of thou­sands.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4400) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.