The Debt Ceiling Could Hit Sooner Than Anyone Thinks

Default would be a disaster. So why does no one know when it’d happen?

No one truly enjoys a debt limit fight.
National Journal
Patrick Reis Matt Berman
Patrick Reis Matt Berman
Aug. 27, 2013, 2 a.m.

The debt ceil­ing is a time bomb with a faulty timer: All of Wash­ing­ton sees it tick­ing to­ward de­fault, but nobody knows ex­actly when it will ex­plode.

In a let­ter to House Speak­er John Boehner, Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew pro­jec­ted that the de­part­ment’s “ex­traordin­ary meas­ures” cur­rently be­ing taken to avoid de­fault will be “ex­hausted in the middle of Oc­to­ber.” From there, Lew writes, the United States would have only whatever cash Treas­ury has on hand, es­tim­ated to be about $50 bil­lion. Lew calls that po­ten­tial situ­ation “un­ac­cept­able.”

But Lew, like every­one else, is just work­ing off his de­part­ment’s best guess.

Treas­ury doesn’t get to pick a date for de­fault. Rather, the de­part­ment is sub­ject to the ebb and flow of gov­ern­ment rev­en­ues and ex­pendit­ures. And those fig­ures are any­thing but pre­dict­able, be­cause how much the gov­ern­ment owes its cred­it­ors on a giv­en day — and how much cash it has to pay them — is based on a host of volat­ile eco­nom­ic, leg­al, and polit­ic­al factors.

“It’s very dif­fi­cult to tell, par­tic­u­larly this far out,” when ex­actly Treas­ury would have to de­fault on its debts, said Steve Bell of the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter. “Oc­to­ber is an ex­tremely lumpy month. Some days, there’s cash com­ing in; oth­er days, there’s cash go­ing out.”

And that un­pre­dict­ab­il­ity makes an ac­ci­dent­al de­fault all the more likely, Bell said, even if neither side wants it to hap­pen.

“That’s the danger. It’s not that some­body plans to do this,” he said. “It’s that this is the time when it’s very, very easy for mis­takes to get made.”

Bell, a former top Re­pub­lic­an staffer on the Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee, cited a host of ex­tern­al factors that could shift Treas­ury’s de­fault date. Chief among them: an un­ex­pec­ted mil­it­ary ac­tion that would cost bil­lions daily, such as the one many are call­ing on the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion to un­der­take in Syr­ia.

An­oth­er big ques­tion is wheth­er Treas­ury can delay cer­tain in­ter­gov­ern­ment­al pay­ments — such as con­tri­bu­tions to the Medi­care and So­cial Se­cur­ity trust funds — without run­ning afoul of leg­al chal­lenges. That is an open ques­tion, Bell said. “I don’t know, and I just don’t think any­body knows,” he said. “It has nev­er been tested be­fore.”

Even the stand­ard daily vari­ation in the num­ber of bills Treas­ury deals with could change the equa­tion, Bell said. “They do five [mil­lion] to 10 mil­lion trans­ac­tions a day. A lot are big ones from De­fense; a lot are tiny from repair­men. They are clumpy, and you put a few to­geth­er, all of a sud­den you’re talk­ing about” $4 bil­lion to $6 bil­lion.

The “middle Oc­to­ber” dead­line came about un­der ar­ti­fi­cial cir­cum­stances to be­gin with. In the be­gin­ning of this year, fa­cing the “fisc­al cliff,” Con­gress made a deal to put off a deal on the debt lim­it un­til May 19. At that point, Lew told Con­gress he was be­gin­ning the “stand­ard set of ex­traordin­ary meas­ures” to keep the gov­ern­ment fun­ded. It’s those meas­ures that will run out some­time this fall.

In the sum­mer of 2011, the U.S. al­most found out ex­actly what hap­pens when Treas­ury hits the ceil­ing. Look­ing at an early-Au­gust dead­line, Con­gress was able to come to a deal to avert a de­fault crisis only at the last minute. So what would have happened if that had fallen through? Un­able to bor­row money, by Au­gust, the Treas­ury De­part­ment would have been un­able to pay al­most half of its 80 mil­lion monthly pay­ments. Based on how the de­part­ment de­cided to pri­or­it­ize pay­ments, that could have in­cluded checks to the 29 mil­lion So­cial Se­cur­ity re­cip­i­ents that were due to go out on Aug. 3. By that date, Treas­ury would have already had an es­tim­ated cash de­fi­cit of about $20 bil­lion.

And it’s not as if all of the hor­rors of 2011 were aver­ted. Ac­cord­ing to a Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice re­port, just the delay in com­ing to a debt-lim­it deal alone res­ul­ted in a $1.3 bil­lion in­crease in Treas­ury’s bor­row­ing costs for fisc­al 2011.

As squishy as the dead­line date is, it’s really just a product of the mal­le­able law that birthed it. Con­gress cre­ated the debt lim­it in 1939 in the run-up to World War II, largely as a means of giv­ing Treas­ury a high­er bor­row­ing lim­it with more flex­ib­il­ity to help the war ef­fort — a sur­pris­ing ori­gin for a law that has be­come Con­gress’s prin­cip­al point of lever­age for ex­tract­ing spend­ing cuts from the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.