How Syria, a Hurricane, or Ben Bernanke Could Move the Debt-Ceiling Deadline

4 possible paths to an early default.

From hurricanes to monetary policy, there are plenty of events beyond the Treasury Department's control.
National Journal
Matt Berman Patrick Reis
Aug. 27, 2013, 9:23 a.m.

Dead­locked over a deal to raise the debt ceil­ing, Con­gress and the White House are flirt­ing with a fed­er­al de­fault. But that’s not the worst of it: Be­cause the ex­act date of de­fault is un­cer­tain, any num­ber of un­fore­seen events could push our fed­er­al fin­ances over the edge.

Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew told Con­gress on Monday that the gov­ern­ment is likely to de­fault on its debts by mid-Oc­to­ber un­less the debt lim­it is raised. But mid-Oc­to­ber could just as eas­ily be early Oc­to­ber. Or it could be late Septem­ber. Or Treas­ury’s ex­traordin­ary meas­ures may, as some ana­lysts are still pre­dict­ing, stave off de­fault un­til Novem­ber.

Set­ting an ex­act de­fault date is dif­fi­cult, if not im­possible, be­cause the gov­ern­ment’s day-to-day fin­ances are dic­tated by a wildly un­pre­dict­able cock­tail of polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic, and nat­ur­al forces. Here are a few hy­po­thet­ic­als that could buy Con­gress more time — or trig­ger de­fault more quickly than any­one saw com­ing.

Syr­ia

Few events wreak more hav­oc than mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tions. Fed­er­al budgets, of course, do not es­cape un­scathed. And now it’s look­ing like there’s a de­cent chance there will be some form of U.S. in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia.

Such an in­ter­ven­tion, even if it’s just a tar­geted mis­sile strike, could cost bil­lions of dol­lars and al­ter the debt-lim­it timeline. In Ju­ly, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair­man Mar­tin De­mp­sey told Con­gress that the cost of tar­geted strikes against Bashar al-As­sad’s mil­it­ary “would be in the bil­lions” and that just in­sti­tut­ing a no-fly zone over the coun­try would cost about $1 bil­lion a month.

One oth­er way of think­ing about the pos­sible cost of tar­geted strikes is to look back to the 1999 NATO re­sponse to eth­nic cleans­ing in Kosovo, which the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is re­portedly cit­ing as a “pre­ced­ent” for a pos­sible Syr­ia cam­paign. NATO con­duc­ted strikes on Ser­bia for 78 days start­ing in March, at a cost to the U.S. of about $5 bil­lion (not ad­jus­ted for in­fla­tion) through Septem­ber 1999.

Act of God

By late Novem­ber of last year, New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie es­tim­ated that su­per­storm Sandy had cost his state $36.8 bil­lion after mak­ing land­fall in Oc­to­ber. Around the same time, New York Gov. An­drew Cuomo was ask­ing for $41 bil­lion in fed­er­al aid for his state, with $15 bil­lion go­ing to New York City alone.

After months of ar­guing, Con­gress ap­proved a $50.5 bil­lion aid pack­age in Janu­ary. That’s a bit more than the amount of money the Treas­ury ex­pects to have on hand come mid-Oc­to­ber. And we’re about to hit peak hur­ricane and trop­ic­al-storm sea­son.

A massive storm or hur­ricane isn’t likely to drastic­ally (or quickly) al­ter the Treas­ury’s debt-ceil­ing es­tim­ate, and Sandy was surely something of an out­lier. It would have to be a “pretty big” storm to make a siz­able dif­fer­ence, says the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter’s Steve Bell, and Sandy was one of the biggest ever. But when every bil­lion counts, an un­ex­pec­ted act of God could make the dead­line rush up just a bit quick­er.

Act of Bernanke

It’s the eco­nomy, stu­pid. The strength of the U.S. eco­nomy largely dic­tates how much tax rev­en­ue hits Treas­ury’s cof­fers, and if the re­cov­ery takes flight this fall, it could buy the gov­ern­ment more time, says Bill Fren­zel, a guest schol­ar at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion.

Eco­nom­ic growth, however, is a double-edged sword be­cause any num­ber of shocks could blow a hole in the re­cov­ery, send­ing tax rev­en­ue crash­ing and ac­cel­er­at­ing the de­fault date. Think back to 2008, when the gov­ern­ment was ex­pect­ing the eco­nomy to keep chug­ging along and provide a steady rev­en­ue stream. But by mid-Oc­to­ber, fin­an­cial firms were col­lapsing, the eco­nomy was con­tract­ing, and a series of con­fid­ent rev­en­ue ex­pect­a­tions ended up be­ing wildly off.

And then there’s Fed­er­al Re­serve Board Chair­man Ben Bernanke, who — with fisc­al policy locked in a per­petu­al stale­mate — ar­gu­ably wields the na­tion’s last policy lever in his cent­ral bank’s mon­et­ary policy. But after years of provid­ing un­pre­ced­en­ted stim­u­lus, Bernanke has been send­ing sig­nals that the bank may soon back off.

That taper­ing could send shock waves through a stock mar­ket that many have long ar­gued is over­due for a con­trac­tion. Giv­en that stocks shuddered in June when Bernanke said the Fed would even­tu­ally taper, provided the eco­nomy stayed strong, the de­cision to peel back on some — but not all — of its stim­u­lus ef­forts would likely set back the eco­nomy and move up the de­fault date.

The Debt-Ceil­ing De­bate It­self

The very pos­sib­il­ity of de­fault could ac­cel­er­ate the debt ceil­ing’s ar­rival. In 2011, in­vestors got jit­tery as the due date drew near and the White House and con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans were mired in stale­mate. The Dow dropped nearly 2,000 points from late Ju­ly to mid-Au­gust of that year, a plunge the mar­ket did not undo un­til 2012.

At a time when Treas­ury is scrap­ing for every tax dol­lar, a sim­il­ar mar­ket run could be enough to tip the needle.

There are signs, however, that the mar­ket has been in­ocu­lated against D.C.’s drama. When Con­gress took the coun­try to the edge of the fisc­al cliff in late 2012, mar­kets didn’t budge, prompt­ing many to spec­u­late that in­vestors no longer buy hard-liner bluster and just as­sume a last-minute deal is com­ing.

Either way, Con­gress’s day of reck­on­ing is com­ing, be­cause — ab­sent le­gis­la­tion ex­tend­ing the ceil­ing — no up­com­ing event will long delay de­fault, Fren­zel says.

“I think we’ve taken it just about as far as we can go,” he says. “I wouldn’t ex­pect any mir­acles.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×