How Syria, a Hurricane, or Ben Bernanke Could Move the Debt-Ceiling Deadline

4 possible paths to an early default.

From hurricanes to monetary policy, there are plenty of events beyond the Treasury Department's control.
National Journal
Matt Berman Patrick Reis
Aug. 27, 2013, 9:23 a.m.

Dead­locked over a deal to raise the debt ceil­ing, Con­gress and the White House are flirt­ing with a fed­er­al de­fault. But that’s not the worst of it: Be­cause the ex­act date of de­fault is un­cer­tain, any num­ber of un­fore­seen events could push our fed­er­al fin­ances over the edge.

Treas­ury Sec­ret­ary Jac­ob Lew told Con­gress on Monday that the gov­ern­ment is likely to de­fault on its debts by mid-Oc­to­ber un­less the debt lim­it is raised. But mid-Oc­to­ber could just as eas­ily be early Oc­to­ber. Or it could be late Septem­ber. Or Treas­ury’s ex­traordin­ary meas­ures may, as some ana­lysts are still pre­dict­ing, stave off de­fault un­til Novem­ber.

Set­ting an ex­act de­fault date is dif­fi­cult, if not im­possible, be­cause the gov­ern­ment’s day-to-day fin­ances are dic­tated by a wildly un­pre­dict­able cock­tail of polit­ic­al, eco­nom­ic, and nat­ur­al forces. Here are a few hy­po­thet­ic­als that could buy Con­gress more time — or trig­ger de­fault more quickly than any­one saw com­ing.

Syr­ia

Few events wreak more hav­oc than mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tions. Fed­er­al budgets, of course, do not es­cape un­scathed. And now it’s look­ing like there’s a de­cent chance there will be some form of U.S. in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia.

Such an in­ter­ven­tion, even if it’s just a tar­geted mis­sile strike, could cost bil­lions of dol­lars and al­ter the debt-lim­it timeline. In Ju­ly, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair­man Mar­tin De­mp­sey told Con­gress that the cost of tar­geted strikes against Bashar al-As­sad’s mil­it­ary “would be in the bil­lions” and that just in­sti­tut­ing a no-fly zone over the coun­try would cost about $1 bil­lion a month.

One oth­er way of think­ing about the pos­sible cost of tar­geted strikes is to look back to the 1999 NATO re­sponse to eth­nic cleans­ing in Kosovo, which the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is re­portedly cit­ing as a “pre­ced­ent” for a pos­sible Syr­ia cam­paign. NATO con­duc­ted strikes on Ser­bia for 78 days start­ing in March, at a cost to the U.S. of about $5 bil­lion (not ad­jus­ted for in­fla­tion) through Septem­ber 1999.

Act of God

By late Novem­ber of last year, New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie es­tim­ated that su­per­storm Sandy had cost his state $36.8 bil­lion after mak­ing land­fall in Oc­to­ber. Around the same time, New York Gov. An­drew Cuomo was ask­ing for $41 bil­lion in fed­er­al aid for his state, with $15 bil­lion go­ing to New York City alone.

After months of ar­guing, Con­gress ap­proved a $50.5 bil­lion aid pack­age in Janu­ary. That’s a bit more than the amount of money the Treas­ury ex­pects to have on hand come mid-Oc­to­ber. And we’re about to hit peak hur­ricane and trop­ic­al-storm sea­son.

A massive storm or hur­ricane isn’t likely to drastic­ally (or quickly) al­ter the Treas­ury’s debt-ceil­ing es­tim­ate, and Sandy was surely something of an out­lier. It would have to be a “pretty big” storm to make a siz­able dif­fer­ence, says the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter’s Steve Bell, and Sandy was one of the biggest ever. But when every bil­lion counts, an un­ex­pec­ted act of God could make the dead­line rush up just a bit quick­er.

Act of Bernanke

It’s the eco­nomy, stu­pid. The strength of the U.S. eco­nomy largely dic­tates how much tax rev­en­ue hits Treas­ury’s cof­fers, and if the re­cov­ery takes flight this fall, it could buy the gov­ern­ment more time, says Bill Fren­zel, a guest schol­ar at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion.

Eco­nom­ic growth, however, is a double-edged sword be­cause any num­ber of shocks could blow a hole in the re­cov­ery, send­ing tax rev­en­ue crash­ing and ac­cel­er­at­ing the de­fault date. Think back to 2008, when the gov­ern­ment was ex­pect­ing the eco­nomy to keep chug­ging along and provide a steady rev­en­ue stream. But by mid-Oc­to­ber, fin­an­cial firms were col­lapsing, the eco­nomy was con­tract­ing, and a series of con­fid­ent rev­en­ue ex­pect­a­tions ended up be­ing wildly off.

And then there’s Fed­er­al Re­serve Board Chair­man Ben Bernanke, who — with fisc­al policy locked in a per­petu­al stale­mate — ar­gu­ably wields the na­tion’s last policy lever in his cent­ral bank’s mon­et­ary policy. But after years of provid­ing un­pre­ced­en­ted stim­u­lus, Bernanke has been send­ing sig­nals that the bank may soon back off.

That taper­ing could send shock waves through a stock mar­ket that many have long ar­gued is over­due for a con­trac­tion. Giv­en that stocks shuddered in June when Bernanke said the Fed would even­tu­ally taper, provided the eco­nomy stayed strong, the de­cision to peel back on some — but not all — of its stim­u­lus ef­forts would likely set back the eco­nomy and move up the de­fault date.

The Debt-Ceil­ing De­bate It­self

The very pos­sib­il­ity of de­fault could ac­cel­er­ate the debt ceil­ing’s ar­rival. In 2011, in­vestors got jit­tery as the due date drew near and the White House and con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans were mired in stale­mate. The Dow dropped nearly 2,000 points from late Ju­ly to mid-Au­gust of that year, a plunge the mar­ket did not undo un­til 2012.

At a time when Treas­ury is scrap­ing for every tax dol­lar, a sim­il­ar mar­ket run could be enough to tip the needle.

There are signs, however, that the mar­ket has been in­ocu­lated against D.C.’s drama. When Con­gress took the coun­try to the edge of the fisc­al cliff in late 2012, mar­kets didn’t budge, prompt­ing many to spec­u­late that in­vestors no longer buy hard-liner bluster and just as­sume a last-minute deal is com­ing.

Either way, Con­gress’s day of reck­on­ing is com­ing, be­cause — ab­sent le­gis­la­tion ex­tend­ing the ceil­ing — no up­com­ing event will long delay de­fault, Fren­zel says.

“I think we’ve taken it just about as far as we can go,” he says. “I wouldn’t ex­pect any mir­acles.”

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×