Almost exactly 50 years after Martin Luther King turned the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, as Rep. John Lewis said, into a pulpit, President Obama stepped onto those same steps and into history. He took the opportunity to talk about not just racial equality, but the economic justice that the original marchers sought.
Those marchers, the president said, sought “not just the absence of oppression, but the presence of economic opportunity.” He continued:
For what does it profit a man, King would ask, to sit at an integrated lunch counter if he can’t afford the meal? This idea that one’s liberty is linked to one’s livelihood that, the pursuit of happiness requires the dignity of work, the skills to find work, decent pay, some measure of material security, this idea was not new.
King explained that the goals of African Americans were identical to working people of all races. Decent wages, fair working conditions, livable housing, old-age security, health and welfare measures, conditions in which families can grow, have education for their children, and respect in the community.
But, Obama said, it is in the realm of economic opportunity where “the goals of 50 years ago have fallen most short.”
The racial gap in wealth “has not lessened, it’s grown.” The president called the dreams of economic opportunity that King described as being “the dream of every American.”
A recent survey from Pew Research shows that this isn’t just political bluster. The survey, which found that many Americans still feel like there’s a long way to go to racial equality, showed that in the decades since the first March on Washington, the racial gap in household income has actually increased. The poverty rate for black Americans is also nearly double the white poverty rate, and unemployment among African-Americans has been consistently higher than that of white Americans.
In July, that employment difference was stark: 12.6 percent unemployment for African-Americans, 6.6 for white.
But this isn’t just a racial issue. As the president said, “the position of all working Americans, regardless of color, has eroded, making the dream Dr. King described even more elusive.”
We must remind ourselves that the measure of progress for those who marched 50 years ago was not merely how many blacks could join the ranks of millionaires. It was whether this country would admit all people willing to work hard regardless of race into the ranks of a middle class life.
The test was not and never has been whether the doors of opportunity are cracked a bit wider for a few. It’s whether our economic system provides a fair shot for the many, for the black custodian and the white steel worker, the immigrant dishwasher and the Native American veteran.
To win that battle, to answer that call, this remains our great unfinished business.
Speaking earlier about King, the president said that his “words belong to the ages,” but that “we would do well to recall the day itself also belonged to ordinary people, whose names never appeared in the history books, or got on TV.”
“In the face of violence,” he said, “they stood up and sat in, with the moral force of nonviolence.” These are the people who had learned from “a lifetime of indignities…that no man can take away the dignity and grace that God grants us.”
As Obama often does, he pointed to the younger generation as a promise of success to come—both on racial equality and economic justice:
For the young are unconstrained by habits of fear. Unconstrained by the conventions of what is. They dare to dream differently, to imagine something better.
Just slightly earlier in the afternoon, former President Bill Clinton brought in the political, saying that “a great democracy does not make it harder to vote than to buy an assault weapon.”
The civil rights legacy of Martin Luther King, Jr. that was hailed by presidents today is only one part of the man himself. But the more radical King has largely been ignored.
You can read Obama’s full remarks here.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."