Obama Calls on Spirit of ‘63 March to Address ‘Unfinished Business’

President Barack Obama delivers remarks during a ceremony commemorating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, Wednesday, Aug. 28,2013, at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington. The president was set to lead civil rights pioneers Wednesday in a ceremony for the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, where Dr. Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech roused the 250,000 people who rallied there decades ago for racial equality. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
Aug. 28, 2013, 2:58 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama on Wed­nes­day hailed the civil-rights pi­on­eers who risked so much in the struggle, us­ing the 50th an­niversary of the epochal March on Wash­ing­ton to cred­it them with his own his­tor­ic elec­tion while out­lining their un­fin­ished agenda of great­er eco­nom­ic se­cur­ity. He also called on today’s gen­er­a­tion of march­ers to “have the cour­age to change.”

“The test was not and nev­er has been wheth­er the doors of op­por­tun­ity are cracked a bit wider for a few,” he said, stand­ing on the steps of the Lin­coln Me­mori­al where Mar­tin Luth­er King Jr. stood in 1963 and de­livered his renowned “I Have a Dream” speech. “It was wheth­er our eco­nom­ic sys­tem provides a fair shot for the many, for the black cus­todi­an and the white steel­work­er, the im­mig­rant dish­wash­er and the Nat­ive Amer­ic­an vet­er­ans. To win that battle, to an­swer that call — this re­mains our great un­fin­ished busi­ness.”

The pres­id­ent was the fi­nal speak­er of the day, fol­low­ing to the mi­cro­phone two former pres­id­ents, the chil­dren of oth­er pres­id­ents, am­bas­sad­ors, labor lead­ers, and vet­er­ans of dec­ades of civil-rights battles. The theme of most of the speeches on this rainy, over­cast day was, as Obama sug­ges­ted, the work still to be done, the in­justices still to be righted, the chal­lenges still to be met. That was ex­pec­ted. No vi­brant polit­ic­al move­ment can spend all its time look­ing back­wards, even on a day de­signed to com­mem­or­ate a shin­ing mo­ment in the move­ment half a cen­tury earli­er.

But it would be im­possible not to look back on the battles won when Obama stood un­der the gaze of Ab­ra­ham Lin­coln, peer­ing out at the Re­flect­ing Pool. Even Obama had to pause for a second in his speech to take note of the his­tory he rep­res­ents as an Afric­an-Amer­ic­an twice elec­ted pres­id­ent of a na­tion whose “ori­gin­al sin” was slavery. Pay­ing homage to the civil-rights pi­on­eers of the 1960s, Obama said, “Be­cause they kept march­ing, Amer­ica changed.” He ad­ded, “Be­cause they marched, city coun­cils changed and state le­gis­latures changed, and Con­gress changed.”

As cheers rose from the tens of thou­sands be­fore him, he con­cluded, “And, yes, even­tu­ally the White House changed.”

In­deed, a black pres­id­ent was not on any­one’s list of de­mands when the March on Wash­ing­ton was staged in 1963. They wanted pas­sage of Pres­id­ent Kennedy’s civil-rights bill, de­seg­reg­a­tion of all pub­lic schools, vot­ing rights, fed­er­al train­ing for the un­em­ployed, and an in­crease in the min­im­um wage to $2 an hour. In the week of the march, they lob­bied for the ap­point­ment of the first black cap­tain on the Wash­ing­ton, D.C., po­lice force. They pushed for the right to sit in a steak res­taur­ant on Route 301 in Prince George’s County, Md., whose own­er was re­fus­ing ser­vice to blacks. Their sights were set far be­low the White House.

At the time of the march, there were only five black mem­bers of the House and no black may­or of a ma­jor city. Soon, Wash­ing­ton would have black may­ors and black po­lice chiefs, and Prince George’s County would be ma­jor­ity black. It would be four years after the march be­fore Carl Stokes in Clev­e­land would be­come that first may­or; 26 years be­fore Doug Wilder in Vir­gin­ia would be­come the first post-Re­con­struc­tion black gov­ernor; and 45 years be­fore Obama would win the pres­id­ency.

So this was a day for tak­ing stock of pro­gress even while set­ting the fu­ture agenda. It was, said Del­eg­ate Elean­or Holmes Norton, D-D.C. — a staffer who helped or­gan­ize the 1963 march — “a worthy en­core.” That was es­pe­cially true for Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., the only sur­viv­ing speak­er from the ori­gin­al march.

“Some­times,” he said, “I hear people say­ing noth­ing has changed. But for someone to grow up the way I grew up in the cot­ton fields of Alabama to now be serving in the United States Con­gress makes me want to tell them come and walk in my shoes. Come walk in the shoes of those who were at­tacked by po­lice dogs, fire hoses, and night­sticks, ar­res­ted and taken to jail.”

Re­call­ing his first trip to Wash­ing­ton in 1961 — the year Obama was born — he spoke of the Free­dom Rides to al­low blacks to ride on Grey­hound buses. “Over 400 of us were ar­res­ted and jailed in Mis­sis­sippi dur­ing the Free­dom Rides. A bus was set on fire in An­nis­ton, Alabama. We were beaten and ar­res­ted and jailed,” Lewis said. “But we helped bring an end to se­greg­a­tion in pub­lic trans­port­a­tion.”

In his speech, the pres­id­ent re­cog­nized the sac­ri­fices of Lewis’s gen­er­a­tion. “Amer­ica changed for you and me,” he said. “But,” he ad­ded, “we would dis­hon­or those her­oes as well to sug­gest that the work of this na­tion is some­how com­plete.” The march­ers of 1963 were here for “jobs as well as justice.” And that prom­ise has not been met, he noted, with black un­em­ploy­ment still double white job­less­ness.

To meet that chal­lenge, Obama sug­ges­ted that a dys­func­tion­al gov­ern­ment will have to im­prove. “Our polit­ics has suffered,” he said, blam­ing “en­trenched in­terests” and elec­ted of­fi­cials “who found it use­ful to prac­tice the old polit­ics of di­vi­sion, do­ing their best to con­vince middle-class Amer­ic­ans of a great un­truth, that gov­ern­ment was some­how it­self to blame for their grow­ing eco­nom­ic in­sec­ur­ity.”

He said the coun­try faces “a choice” between “our cur­rent path in which the gears of this great demo­cracy grind to a halt” or a re­turn to the ideal­ism of those who as­sembled here in 1963. “We’ll have to re­ignite the em­bers of em­pathy and fel­low feel­ing, the co­ali­tion of con­science that found ex­pres­sion in this place 50 years ago.”

Obama’s re­marks fol­lowed short­er speeches by Pres­id­ents Carter and Clin­ton; all liv­ing former pres­id­ents were in­vited to speak, but George H.W. Bush could not travel be­cause of his health and George W. Bush is re­cov­er­ing from sur­gery.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×