In Congress, It’s the Fresher Faces Pushing for Vote on Syria Strike

After three wave elections following the Iraq invasion, this is the first time many lawmakers have experienced the drumbeats of war.

Congressman Scott Rigell, R-Va., gestures during an interview in his office in Virginia Beach, Va., Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012. Rigel is a freshman Congressman being challenged by Democrat Paul Hirschbiel. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
Aug. 29, 2013, 1:46 p.m.

The push for a con­gres­sion­al vote ahead of any mil­it­ary strike in Syr­ia is be­ing spear­headed largely by law­makers who were not in Con­gress dur­ing the run-up to the war in Ir­aq.

As of Wed­nes­day, Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Scott Ri­gell had col­lec­ted the sig­na­tures of 140 House mem­bers de­mand­ing that Pres­id­ent Obama call Con­gress back in­to ses­sion to vote be­fore launch­ing an of­fens­ive in Syr­ia. And roughly three-quar­ters of the sign­ers, in­clud­ing Ri­gell him­self, a former Mar­ine elec­ted in 2010 who rep­res­ents the mil­it­ary-heavy area around Nor­folk, Va., came to Con­gress after the Ir­aq war had be­gun. More still had ar­rived after the Ir­aq war res­ol­u­tion passed in late 2002.

The same is also true in the Sen­ate, where first-term sen­at­ors have been among the loudest voices push­ing for ex­pli­cit con­gres­sion­al au­thor­iz­a­tion.

Much of the Con­gress has turned over since the early 2003 in­va­sion of Ir­aq, with three wave elec­tions in 2006, 2008, and 2010 sweep­ing away law­makers and re­dis­trict­ing elim­in­at­ing the seats of still oth­ers in 2012.

Only 32 cur­rent sen­at­ors served in 2002 dur­ing the fall vote on the Ir­aq war res­ol­u­tion and only 38 were there when Amer­ic­an troops launched the in­va­sion in the spring of 2003. In the House, roughly 40 per­cent of cur­rent mem­bers — 172 of them — were sworn in at the time of the 2003 in­va­sion.

That means that, for many in the cur­rent Con­gress, this is the first time they’ve ex­per­i­enced the drum­beats of war, out­side of the strikes that Obama au­thor­ized against Libya earli­er in his pres­id­ency. And in­stead of march­ing in line, the fresh faces are among those most loudly de­mand­ing a pub­lic de­bate.

“The U.S. should not take mil­it­ary ac­tion without con­gres­sion­al au­thor­iz­a­tion,” Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., said this week.

“When and if Pres­id­ent Obama makes a de­cision on Syr­ia, he must im­me­di­ately call a spe­cial ses­sion of Con­gress and per­suade the Amer­ic­an people that what he pro­poses is crit­ic­al to the de­fense of our na­tion,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, ad­ded.

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said Thursday on CNN’s New Day that “get­ting con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al is in my view con­sti­tu­tion­ally re­quired. “

Kaine, Murphy, and Cruz are all Sen­ate fresh­men.

When Obama was run­ning for pres­id­ent, he em­braced the power of Con­gress to au­thor­ize mil­it­ary strikes, telling The Bo­ston Globe, “The pres­id­ent does not have power un­der the Con­sti­tu­tion to uni­lat­er­ally au­thor­ize a mil­it­ary at­tack in a situ­ation that does not in­volve stop­ping an ac­tu­al or im­min­ent threat to the na­tion.”

On Thursday, Obama called House Speak­er John Boehner to brief him about the de­vel­op­ments in Syr­ia, and his top aides pre­pared to brief con­gres­sion­al lead­ers on rel­ev­ant com­mit­tees in the even­ing.

It is not clear what is caus­ing the di­vide between the old guard of Con­gress and the new, but it is pro­nounced. Mem­bers who were not in Con­gress pre-Ir­aq are sign­ing on to Ri­gell’s let­ter at a faster clip.

For in­stance, the cur­rent chair­man of the House Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee, Rep. Mi­chael Mc­Caul of Texas, elec­ted in 2004, has signed the let­ter call­ing for con­gres­sion­al in­put. In con­trast, his pre­de­cessor as chair­man, GOP Rep. Pete King of New York, elec­ted in 1992, has said, “I be­lieve the pres­id­ent can take this ac­tion without au­thor­iz­a­tion from the Con­gress.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4408) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×