U.S. intelligence officials are far more worried about the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons and materials than the government has publicly admitted, according to a report on the secret budget for U.S. intelligence operations that was leaked to the Washington Post by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
The intelligence community has significantly heightened its efforts to keep tabs not only on Pakistan’s nuclear weapons but also on chemical and biological facilities in the violence-wracked South Asian nation, according to the so-called “black budget” for fiscal 2013. That classified U.S. spending plan covers the operations of a number of U.S. spy agencies involved in covert activities, counterintelligence and surveillance.
The 178-page summary of the secret budget reveals that the United States has grown more suspicious of Pakistan, and also has carried out a much broader intelligence-collection effort of its supposed security partner than was previously known, the Post reported.
“Knowledge of the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons and associated material encompassed one of the most critical set of … intelligence gaps,” reportedly states the budget overview, which was signed by U.S. National Intelligence Director James Clapper. This lack of information is especially troubling in light of “the political instability, terrorist threat and expanding inventory (of nuclear weapons) in that country,” the document is said to read.
The budget overview does not disclose the specific amount of money spent on surveillance of Pakistan, though it does indicate the country is a focus of U.S. nonproliferation and anti-terrorism efforts.
The U.S. intelligence community requested roughly $6.9 billion for fiscal 2013 to fund efforts to limit the spread of weapons of mass destruction and $16.6 billion to combat al-Qaida and other terrorist organizations. When combined, those two areas take up close to 50 percent of the spy agencies’ desired funding for the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.
U.S. spy agencies are concentrating on two especially troubling possibilities in Pakistan: the chance that atomic sites in the nation would be assaulted by local extremist groups, and that radical militants would be able to infiltrate the military or intelligence agencies, giving them a better position to gain access to nuclear materials or to mount an insider attack, according to the article.
The United States does not know much about how Pakistani nuclear material is channeled through the various facilities involved in the warhead program. U.S. worries about the country’s nuclear weapons seem to be the result of just how little information is known than by any particular information that would suggest a security gap, the Post concludes after reviewing the budget documents.
The budget summary reportedly contains a table that lists a minimum of six areas where information about Pakistan’s nuclear weapon activities is deemed lacking. The Post does not disclose what those six areas are.
The U.S. intelligence community’s formation of a Pakistan WMD Analysis Cell to monitor the physical status of atomic substances was seen as helpful in providing a “more comprehensive understanding of strategic weapons security in Pakistan,” the document is said to state.
Still, “the number of gaps associated with Pakistani nuclear security remains the same,” the budget overview reportedly says, and “the questions associated with this intractable target are more complex.”
Multiple mentions in the secret document about the augmentation of U.S. surveillance over Pakistani biological and chemical research facilities is thought to be the result of concerns that extremist organizations might attempt to steal WMD-relevant substances from the state-managed laboratories, according to the Post.
The United States also is monitoring the security of neighboring India’s nuclear activities, the budget report is said to state.
What We're Following See More »
"Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton will score another high-powered Republican endorsement on Wednesday, according to a campaign aide: retired senator John Warner of Virginia, a popular GOP maverick with renowned military credentials."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Tuesday "heard several hours of oral arguments" over the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan rules. The 10-judge panel "focused much of their questioning on whether the EPA had overstepped its legal authority by seeking to broadly compel this shift away from coal, a move the EPA calls the Best System of Emission Reduction, or BSER. The states and companies suing the EPA argue the agency doesn’t have the authority to regulate anything outside of a power plant itself."
"Spending by super PACs tied to Donald Trump friends such as Ben Carson and banker Andy Beal will help make this week the general election's most expensive yet. Republicans and Democrats will spend almost $28 million on radio and television this week, according to advertising records, as Trump substantially increases his advertising buy for the final stretch. He's spending $6.4 million in nine states, part of what aides have said will be a $100 million television campaign through Election Day."
Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.