U.S. intelligence officials are far more worried about the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons and materials than the government has publicly admitted, according to a report on the secret budget for U.S. intelligence operations that was leaked to the Washington Post by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.
The intelligence community has significantly heightened its efforts to keep tabs not only on Pakistan’s nuclear weapons but also on chemical and biological facilities in the violence-wracked South Asian nation, according to the so-called “black budget” for fiscal 2013. That classified U.S. spending plan covers the operations of a number of U.S. spy agencies involved in covert activities, counterintelligence and surveillance.
The 178-page summary of the secret budget reveals that the United States has grown more suspicious of Pakistan, and also has carried out a much broader intelligence-collection effort of its supposed security partner than was previously known, the Post reported.
“Knowledge of the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons and associated material encompassed one of the most critical set of … intelligence gaps,” reportedly states the budget overview, which was signed by U.S. National Intelligence Director James Clapper. This lack of information is especially troubling in light of “the political instability, terrorist threat and expanding inventory (of nuclear weapons) in that country,” the document is said to read.
The budget overview does not disclose the specific amount of money spent on surveillance of Pakistan, though it does indicate the country is a focus of U.S. nonproliferation and anti-terrorism efforts.
The U.S. intelligence community requested roughly $6.9 billion for fiscal 2013 to fund efforts to limit the spread of weapons of mass destruction and $16.6 billion to combat al-Qaida and other terrorist organizations. When combined, those two areas take up close to 50 percent of the spy agencies’ desired funding for the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30.
U.S. spy agencies are concentrating on two especially troubling possibilities in Pakistan: the chance that atomic sites in the nation would be assaulted by local extremist groups, and that radical militants would be able to infiltrate the military or intelligence agencies, giving them a better position to gain access to nuclear materials or to mount an insider attack, according to the article.
The United States does not know much about how Pakistani nuclear material is channeled through the various facilities involved in the warhead program. U.S. worries about the country’s nuclear weapons seem to be the result of just how little information is known than by any particular information that would suggest a security gap, the Post concludes after reviewing the budget documents.
The budget summary reportedly contains a table that lists a minimum of six areas where information about Pakistan’s nuclear weapon activities is deemed lacking. The Post does not disclose what those six areas are.
The U.S. intelligence community’s formation of a Pakistan WMD Analysis Cell to monitor the physical status of atomic substances was seen as helpful in providing a “more comprehensive understanding of strategic weapons security in Pakistan,” the document is said to state.
Still, “the number of gaps associated with Pakistani nuclear security remains the same,” the budget overview reportedly says, and “the questions associated with this intractable target are more complex.”
Multiple mentions in the secret document about the augmentation of U.S. surveillance over Pakistani biological and chemical research facilities is thought to be the result of concerns that extremist organizations might attempt to steal WMD-relevant substances from the state-managed laboratories, according to the Post.
The United States also is monitoring the security of neighboring India’s nuclear activities, the budget report is said to state.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."