U.S. Concerned About Pakistani Nuke Security, Secret Budget Reveals

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 3, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

U.S. in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials are far more wor­ried about the se­cur­ity of Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar weapons and ma­ter­i­als than the gov­ern­ment has pub­licly ad­mit­ted, ac­cord­ing to a re­port on the secret budget for U.S. in­tel­li­gence op­er­a­tions that was leaked to the Wash­ing­ton Post by former NSA con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden.

The in­tel­li­gence com­munity has sig­ni­fic­antly heightened its ef­forts to keep tabs not only on Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar weapons but also on chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al fa­cil­it­ies in the vi­ol­ence-wracked South Asi­an na­tion, ac­cord­ing to the so-called “black budget” for fisc­al 2013. That clas­si­fied U.S. spend­ing plan cov­ers the op­er­a­tions of a num­ber of U.S. spy agen­cies in­volved in cov­ert activ­it­ies, coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence and sur­veil­lance.

The 178-page sum­mary of the secret budget re­veals that the United States has grown more sus­pi­cious of Pakistan, and also has car­ried out a much broad­er in­tel­li­gence-col­lec­tion ef­fort of its sup­posed se­cur­ity part­ner than was pre­vi­ously known, the Post re­por­ted.

“Know­ledge of the se­cur­ity of Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar weapons and as­so­ci­ated ma­ter­i­al en­com­passed one of the most crit­ic­al set of … in­tel­li­gence gaps,” re­portedly states the budget over­view, which was signed by U.S. Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence Dir­ect­or James Clap­per. This lack of in­form­a­tion is es­pe­cially troub­ling in light of “the polit­ic­al in­stabil­ity, ter­ror­ist threat and ex­pand­ing in­vent­ory (of nuc­le­ar weapons) in that coun­try,” the doc­u­ment is said to read.

The budget over­view does not dis­close the spe­cif­ic amount of money spent on sur­veil­lance of Pakistan, though it does in­dic­ate the coun­try is a fo­cus of U.S. non­pro­lif­er­a­tion and anti-ter­ror­ism ef­forts.

The U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity re­ques­ted roughly $6.9 bil­lion for fisc­al 2013 to fund ef­forts to lim­it the spread of weapons of mass de­struc­tion and $16.6 bil­lion to com­bat al-Qaida and oth­er ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tions. When com­bined, those two areas take up close to 50 per­cent of the spy agen­cies’ de­sired fund­ing for the cur­rent fisc­al year, which ends Sept. 30.

U.S. spy agen­cies are con­cen­trat­ing on two es­pe­cially troub­ling pos­sib­il­it­ies in Pakistan: the chance that atom­ic sites in the na­tion would be as­saul­ted by loc­al ex­trem­ist groups, and that rad­ic­al mil­it­ants would be able to in­filt­rate the mil­it­ary or in­tel­li­gence agen­cies, giv­ing them a bet­ter po­s­i­tion to gain ac­cess to nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als or to mount an in­sider at­tack, ac­cord­ing to the art­icle.

The United States does not know much about how Pakistani nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al is channeled through the vari­ous fa­cil­it­ies in­volved in the war­head pro­gram. U.S. wor­ries about the coun­try’s nuc­le­ar weapons seem to be the res­ult of just how little in­form­a­tion is known than by any par­tic­u­lar in­form­a­tion that would sug­gest a se­cur­ity gap, the Post con­cludes after re­view­ing the budget doc­u­ments.

The budget sum­mary re­portedly con­tains a table that lists a min­im­um of six areas where in­form­a­tion about Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar weapon activ­it­ies is deemed lack­ing. The Post does not dis­close what those six areas are.

The U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s form­a­tion of a Pakistan WMD Ana­lys­is Cell to mon­it­or the phys­ic­al status of atom­ic sub­stances was seen as help­ful in provid­ing a “more com­pre­hens­ive un­der­stand­ing of stra­tegic weapons se­cur­ity in Pakistan,” the doc­u­ment is said to state.

Still, “the num­ber of gaps as­so­ci­ated with Pakistani nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity re­mains the same,” the budget over­view re­portedly says, and “the ques­tions as­so­ci­ated with this in­tract­able tar­get are more com­plex.”

Mul­tiple men­tions in the secret doc­u­ment about the aug­ment­a­tion of U.S. sur­veil­lance over Pakistani bio­lo­gic­al and chem­ic­al re­search fa­cil­it­ies is thought to be the res­ult of con­cerns that ex­trem­ist or­gan­iz­a­tions might at­tempt to steal WMD-rel­ev­ant sub­stances from the state-man­aged labor­at­or­ies, ac­cord­ing to the Post.

The United States also is mon­it­or­ing the se­cur­ity of neigh­bor­ing In­dia’s nuc­le­ar activ­it­ies, the budget re­port is said to state.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
23 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×